Patent Bar Review
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 326: Applications that count for “gross income” basis micro entity status.
2:44
2:44
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
2:44Question: What applications count for the filing limits for the purposes of establishing micro entity status under the “gross income” basis? Answer: For purposes of establishing micro entity status under the “gross income” basis, the application filing limit includes: (i) previously filed U.S. nonprovisional applications (e.g., utility, design, pla…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 325: List the pieces of information that should be placed on the first page of a protest.
2:53
2:53
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
2:53Question: List two pieces of information that should be placed on the first page of a protest. Answer: Each protest should be clearly identified as a “PROTEST UNDER 37 CFR 1.291.” It is also important that any protest against a pending application specifically identify the application to which the protest is directed with the identification being […
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 324: Name items that must be submitted when adding a “Sequence Listing” after the application filing date.
3:01
3:01
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:01Question: Name at least two items that must be submitted when adding a “Sequence Listing” after the application filing date. Answer: Adding a “Sequence Listing” after the application filing date involves the submission of: (1) a “Sequence Listing” either as a PDF image file, on physical sheets of paper, or as an ASCII plain text […] The post MPEP Q…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 323: Can distinct subject matter be recovered by filing a reissue application in specific cases?
3:19
3:19
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:19Question: Where a restriction (including an election of species) requirement was made in an application and applicant permitted the elected invention to issue as a patent without filing a divisional application on the non-elected invention(s) or on non-claimed subject matter distinct from the elected invention, can the non-elected invention(s) and …
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 322: What type of Demand will prevent an international application designating the U.S. to enter?
2:26
2:26
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
2:26Question: What type of Demand will prevent an international application designating the U.S. to enter the national stage via the U.S. Designated Office? Answer: An international application designating the U.S. will enter the national stage via the U.S. Designated Office unless a Demand electing the U.S. is filed under PCT Article 31 whereupon entr…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 321: What are the factual inquiries related to obviousness?
3:41
3:41
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:41Question: What are the factual inquiries related to obviousness that the Court enunciates? Answer: Obviousness is a question of law based on underlying factual inquiries. The factual inquiries enunciated by the Court are as follows: (A) Determining the scope and content of the prior art; (B) Ascertaining the differences between the claimed inventio…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 320: What are the three types of designs interpreted by case law to include?
2:22
2:22
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
2:22Question: What are the three types of designs the language “new, original and ornamental design for an article of manufacture” has been interpreted by the case law to include? Answer: The language “new, original and ornamental design for an article of manufacture” has been interpreted by the case law to include at least three kinds of designs: […] …
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 319: What must any assignment-related document for patent matters submitted by facsimile include?
2:11
2:11
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
2:11Question: What three items must any assignment-related document for patent matters submitted by facsimile include? Answer: Any assignment-related document for patent matters submitted by facsimile must include: (A) an identified application or patent number; (B) one cover sheet to record a single transaction; and (C) payment of the recordation fee …
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 318: Requirements of an oath or declaration under section 37 CFR 1.63.
2:39
2:39
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
2:39Question: Name two requirements of an oath or declaration under section 37 CFR 1.63? Answer: An oath or declaration under section 37 CFR 1.63 must: (1) Identify the inventor or joint inventor executing the oath or declaration by his or her legal name; (2) Identify the application to which it is directed; (3) Include a […] The post MPEP Q & A 318: R…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 317: How can you determine whether the original patent requirement is satisfied in a reissue application?
3:02
3:02
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:02Question: How can you determine whether the original patent requirement is satisfied in a reissue application? Answer: Examiners should review the reissue application to determine whether the original patent requirement is satisfied, by considering if: (A) the claims presented in the reissue application are described in the original patent specific…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 316: Is it ever necessary to change the inventorship named in the application?
3:52
3:52
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:52Question: If an application by joint inventors includes more than one independent and distinct invention, and restriction is required, is it ever necessary to change the inventorship named in the application? Answer: If an application by joint inventors includes more than one independent and distinct invention, and restriction is required, it may b…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 315: List examples of situations that confirm a “real world” context of use.
3:11
3:11
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:11Question: List two examples of situations that require or constitute carrying out further research to identify or reasonably confirm a “real world” context of use and, therefore, do not define “substantial utilities.” Answer: The following are examples of situations that require or constitute carrying out further research to identify or reasonably …
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 314: What will the request indicate for each patent and printed publication cited in the request?
3:30
3:30
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:30Question: When an examiner concludes that no substantial new question of patentability has been raised, they will prepare a decision denying the reexamination request. What will that request indicate for each patent and printed publication cited in the request? Answer: If the examiner concludes that no substantial new question of patentability has …
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 313: Reasons why the Office will withdraw the application from issue.
2:19
2:19
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
2:19Question: Once the issue fee has been paid, list two reasons why the Office will withdraw the application from issue at its own initiative. Answer: Once the issue fee has been paid, the Office will not withdraw the application from issue at its own initiative for any reason except: (1) A mistake on the part […] The post MPEP Q & A 313: Reasons why …
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 312: List two General Plastic non-exclusive factors.
3:18
3:18
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:18Question: List two General Plastic non-exclusive factors. Answer: The General Plastic non-exclusive factors include the following: Whether the same petitioner previously filed a petition directed to the same claims of the same patent; Whether at the time of filing of the first petition the petitioner knew of the prior art asserted in the second pet…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 311: Two requirements for a petition for suspension of action under 37 CFR 1.103(a)
3:23
3:23
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:23Question: List two requirements for a petition for suspension of action under 37 CFR 1.103(a). Answer: A petition for suspension of action under 37 CFR 1.103(a) must: (A) be presented as a separate paper; (B) be accompanied by the petition fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(g); (C) request a specific and reasonable period of suspension not greater than […
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 310: List two examples of notices issued as part of the pre-examination processing of an application
3:29
3:29
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:29Question: The three-month period in 37 CFR 1.704(b) applies to the Office notices and letters issued as part of the pre-examination processing of an application (except a Notice of Omitted Items in a Nonprovisional Application as discussed above). List two examples of these notices. Answer: These notices include: A Notice of Incomplete Nonprovision…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 309: List two requirements for adding a “Sequence Listing” after the application filing date?
3:15
3:15
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:15Question: List two requirements for adding a “Sequence Listing” after the application filing date? Answer: Adding a “Sequence Listing” after the application filing date involves the submission of: a “Sequence Listing” either as a PDF image file, on physical sheets of paper, or as an ASCII plain text file submitted via the USPTO patent electronic [……
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 308: What type of arguments should a patent owner preliminary response include?
3:35
3:35
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:35Question: What type of arguments should a patent owner preliminary response include? Answer: A patent owner preliminary response may include one or more of the following arguments: The petitioner is statutorily barred from pursuing a review; The references asserted to establish that the claims are unpatentable are not in fact printed publications; …
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 307: When are electronic means or medium for filing IDSs permitted?
2:55
2:55
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
2:55Question: When are electronic means or medium for filing IDSs permitted? Answer: As shown in chapter 600 … Electronic means or medium for filing IDSs are not permitted except for: IDSs electronically submitted using the USPTO patent electronic filing system; or copies of large tables, computer program listings, and sequence listings submitted as a …
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 306: Sealed confidential information prior to the institution of the trial by which options?
3:05
3:05
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:05Question: Where a petitioner files a motion to seal with the petition that seeks entry of a protective order other than the default protective order, a patent owner may only access the sealed confidential information prior to the institution of the trial by which options? Answer: Where a petitioner files a motion to seal with […] The post MPEP Q & …
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 305: What must the supplemental search fee be accompanied by in addition to the payment?
2:29
2:29
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
2:29Question: What must the supplemental search fee be accompanied by in addition to the payment? Answer: As shown in chapter 1800 … The supplemental search fee must be paid and be accompanied by: a protest and a request for refund of the supplemental search fee. Chapter Details: The answer to this question can be found […] The post MPEP Q & A 305: Wha…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 304: What does routine discovery include?
3:03
3:03
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:03Question: What does routine discovery include? Answer: Routine discovery includes: Production of any exhibit cited in a paper or testimony; The cross-examination of the other sides declarants; and Relevant information that is inconsistent with a position advanced during the proceeding. Routine discovery places the parties on a level playing field a…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 303: What should a certificate of correction filed via the patent electronic filing system use as the document description?
2:15
2:15
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
2:15Question: What should a request for a certificate of correction filed via the patent electronic filing system use as the document description? Answer: “A request for a certificate of correction filed via the patent electronic filing system should use the document description: Request for Certificate of Correction.” Chapter Details: The answer to th…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 302: Major differences between 35 U.S.C. 102(c) and the CREATE Act
3:30
3:30
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:30Question: What are the major differences between 35 U.S.C. 102(c) and the CREATE Act? Answer: The major differences between 35 U.S.C. 102(c) and the CREATE Act are the following: 35 U.S.C. 102(c)is keyed to the effective filing date of the claimed invention, while the CREATE Act (pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c)) focuses on the date that the claimed invent…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 301: What does the prohibition on ex parte communications not extend to?
3:19
3:19
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:19Question: All substantive communications with the Board regarding a proceeding must include all parties to the proceeding, except as otherwise authorized. What does the prohibition on ex parte communications not extend to? Answer: All substantive communications with the Board regarding a proceeding must include all parties to the proceeding, except…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 300: Difference between sequence listing requirements filed before or after July 1, 2022
3:55
3:55
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:55Question: What is the difference between sequence listing requirements filed before or after July 1, 2022? Answer: For applications filed before July 1, 2022, the sequence listing can be a “Sequence Listing” (as an ACSII plain text file in compliance with 37 CFR 1.821-1.824) submission must be submitted via the USPTO patent electronic filing system…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 299: What should a motion to exclude evidence include?
3:23
3:23
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:23Question: What should a motion to exclude evidence include? Answer: A motion to exclude evidence should: (a) Identify where in the record the objection originally was made; (b) Identify where in the record the evidence sought to be excluded was relied upon by an opponent; (c) Address objections to exhibits in numerical order; and (d) […] The post M…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 298: Submission requirements for “Sequence Listing XML”
3:09
3:09
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:09Question: A “Sequence Listing XML” may be submitted as a XML file with a “.xml” extension via the USPTO patent electronic filing system or as read-only optical discs. What does such a submission require? Answer: Such submission requires that applicant provide a statement in a separate paragraph that incorporates by reference the material in the […]…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 297: List two situations where a certificate of correction may not be appropriate.
3:37
3:37
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:37Question: List two exemplary situations where a certificate of correction under 35 U.S.C. 255 may not be appropriate. Answer: Exemplary situations where a certificate of correction under 35 U.S.C. 255 may not be appropriate: (A) Adding or correcting a claim to a prior application having a filing date before March 16, 2013 in a patent that was exami…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 296: List the criteria for “Large Tables”
2:48
2:48
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
2:48Question: List the criteria for “Large Tables” that may be submitted in electronic form in ASCII plain text. Answer: “Large Tables” that may be submitted in electronic form in ASCII plain text are: any individual table that is more than 50 pages in length, or multiple tables, if the total number of pages of all […] The post MPEP Q & A 296: List the…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 295: Which of the new trial proceedings can the patent owner file a preliminary response for?
2:49
2:49
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
2:49Question: Which of the following new trial proceedings can the patent owner file a preliminary response for? Answer: The patent owner is afforded an opportunity to file a preliminary response for inter partes review (IPR), postgrant review (PGR), and covered business method patents (CBM). Chapter Details: This question comes from the following supp…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 294: What are the two aspects every requirement to restrict has?
2:39
2:39
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
2:39Question: What are the two aspects every requirement to restrict has? Answer: Every requirement to restrict has two aspects: the reasons (as distinguished from the mere statement of conclusion) why each invention as claimedis either independent or distinct from the other(s); and the reasons why there would be a serious search and/or examination bur…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 293: Who conducts derivation proceedings, inter partes reviews, and post-grant reviews?
2:23
2:23
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
2:23Question: Who conducts derivation proceedings, inter partes reviews, and post-grant reviews? Answer: The Board is to conduct derivation proceedings, inter partes reviews, and post-grant reviews. Chapter Details: This question comes from the following supplement “Patent Trial and Appeal Board Consolidated Trial Practice Guide November 2019”. This is…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 292: Two changes the Hague Agreement Article 16(1) provides
3:22
3:22
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:22Question: List two changes the Hague Agreement Article 16(1) provides for in the International Register by the International Bureau. Answer: Hague Agreement Article 16(1) provides for the recording of certain changes in the International Register by the International Bureau, including: a change in ownership of the international registration; a chan…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 291: When did the derivation rules go into effect?
2:30
2:30
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
2:30Question: When did the derivation rules go into effect? Answer: The derivation rules went into effect 18 months after AIA enactment (March 16, 2013). Chapter Details: This question comes from the following supplement “Patent Trial and Appeal Board Consolidated Trial Practice Guide November 2019”. This is a special supplement that at the time of thi…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 290: Use of metric system of measurements in patent applications
3:12
3:12
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:12Question: How should measurements be given within a patent application? Answer: In order to minimize the necessity in the future for converting dimensions given in the English system of measurements to the metric system of measurements when using printed patents as research and prior art search documents, all patent applicants should use the metric…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 289: List two situations that are not considered new grounds of rejection?
3:51
3:51
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:51Question: List two situations that are not considered new grounds of rejection? Answer: Where the statutory basis for the rejection remains the same, and the evidence relied upon in support of the rejection remains the same, a change in the discussion of, or rationale in support of, the rejection does not necessarily constitute a new […] The post M…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 288: How may an examiner treat an amendment not fully responsive to a non-final Office action?
3:12
3:12
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:12Question: How may an examiner treat an amendment not fully responsive to a non-final Office action? Answer: An examiner may treat an amendment not fully responsive to a non-final Office action by: (A) accepting the amendment as an adequate reply to the non-final Office action to avoid abandonment under 35 U.S.C. 133 and 37 CFR1.135; […] The post MP…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 287: When inconsistent information is given for an application data sheet, what submission will govern control?
3:58
3:58
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:58Question: When inconsistent information is given for an application data sheet, what submission will govern control according to 37 CFR 1.76(d)(1)? Answer: 37 CFR 1.76(d)(1) provides that the most recent submission will govern (control) with respect to inconsistencies as between the information provided in an application data sheet, a designation o…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 286: What are the factual inquiries of obviousness enunciated by the Court?
4:31
4:31
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
4:31Question: What are the factual inquiries of obviousness enunciated by the Court? Answer: Obviousness is a question of law based on underlying factual inquiries. The factual inquiries enunciated by the Court are as follows: (A) Determining the scope and content of the prior art; (B) Ascertaining the differences between the claimed invention and the …
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 285: What don’t the provisions of 37 CFR 1.114 apply to?
3:51
3:51
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:51Question: What do the provisions of 37 CFR 1.114, request for continued examination, not apply to? Answer: The provisions of 27 CFR 1.114, Request for continued examination, do not apply to: (1) A provisional application; (2) An application for a utility or plant patent filed under 35 U.S.C. 111(a) before June 8, 1995; (3) An […] The post MPEP Q & …
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 284: When will a provisional application be given a filing date?
2:52
2:52
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
2:52Question: When will a provisional application be given a filing date? Answer: A provisional application filed on or after December 18, 2013 will be given a filing date as of the date a specification, with or without claims, is received in the Office. Chapter Details: The answer to this question can be found in chapter […] The post MPEP Q & A 284: W…
…
continue reading
Question: List at least 3 special cases (those which are advanced out of turn for examination). Answer: The following is a list of special cases (those which are advanced out of turn for examination): (A) Applications on inventions that are deemed of peculiar importance to some branch of the public service and when for that […] The post MPEP Q & A …
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 282: Continued prosecution application practice for utility and plant applications
4:13
4:13
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
4:13Question: Since CPA applications were eliminated for utility and plant applications, what should applicants who wish to continue examination of the same claimed invention after the prosecution of a utility or plant application is closed consider filing? Answer: Effective July 14, 2003, continued prosecution application (CPA) practice was eliminated…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 281: Time for reply to final rejection
4:08
4:08
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
4:08Question: What is the time for reply to a final rejection? Answer: The time for reply to a final rejection is as follows: (A) All final rejections setting a 3-month shortened statutory period (SSP) for reply should contain a form paragraph advising applicant that if the first reply is filed within 2 months of the […] The post MPEP Q & A 281: Time f…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 280: When does the revocation of a filing receipt license become effective?
2:46
2:46
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
2:46Question: When does the revocation of a filing receipt license become effective? Answer: The revocation becomes effective on the date on which the notice is mailed. Chapter Details: The answer to this question can be found in chapter 100 of the MPEP. This chapter covers Secrecy, Access, National Security, and Foreign Filing. The answer is […] The p…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 279: Methods of paying a maintenance fee and necessary surcharges
3:26
3:26
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:26Question: How can a maintenance fee and any necessary surcharge be made? Answer: The method of payment for the maintenance fee and any necessary surcharge shall be made in U.S. dollars and in the form of a cashier’s or certified check, Treasury note, national bank notes, or United States Postal Service money order as provided […] The post MPEP Q & …
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 278: Claiming the benefit of a provisional application
3:27
3:27
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:27Question: What does a petition under 37 CFR 1.78(b) require? Answer: A petition under 37 CFR 1.78(b) requires: (A) the reference required by 35 U.S.C. 119(e)and 37 CFR 1.78 to the prior-filed provisional application, which must be included in application data sheet (unless previously submitted in an application data sheet); (B) the petition fee as …
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 277: Exceptions to extensions of time
3:48
3:48
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:48Question: 37 CFR 1.136(a) permits an applicant to file a petition for extension of time and a fee up to 5 months after the end of the time period set to take action except during which circumstances? Answer: 37 CFR 1.136(a) permits an applicant to file a petition for extension of time and a fee […] The post MPEP Q & A 277: Exceptions to extensions …
…
continue reading