))
'Inventorship in the light of Thaler v. Comptroller-General': CIPIL Evening seminar
Manage episode 455277223 series 3623930
Content provided by Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, Faculty of Law, and University of Cambridge. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, Faculty of Law, and University of Cambridge or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
Speaker: Stuart Baran, Three New Square
Abstract: The UK Supreme Court recently gave judgment in Thaler, upholding the refusal of patent applications listing DABUS, an AI, as the inventor. After looking at what the UKSC decided and why, I will consider three broader questions that arise from the litigation: (i) why did the case take the shape it did – in particular, was it driven by questions of procedure more than substance?; (ii) what does the judgment mean for patents arising from AI inventions in future?; and (iii) how do we approach the appropriate division of labour between the courts and Parliament in approaching these questions?
Biography: Stuart is Barrister at Three New Square Chambers. He was Legal 500 Junior of the Year in IP, IT and Media for 2018. In 2019 he was appointed to a three-year term as one of two Standing Counsel to HM Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks. He practises in all areas of intellectual property, including: patents, SPCs, trade marks, passing off, copyright, designs and confidential information.
For more information see:
https://www.cipil.law.cam.ac.uk/seminars-and-events/cipil-seminars
161 episodes
Share
