Texas Flooding was CAUSED by Weather Manipulation and DAM RELEASES. North Carolina & Three Gorges Dam in China, ALSO Dam Releases. 1931 Yangtze River Basin in China killed Millions.

Psychopath In Your Life Podcast

I always like Walking in the Rain so no one can see me Crying. - Charlie Chaplin

Hurricane Helene -North Carolina LAND GRAB – to make room for TESLA mining in the EXACT same area? They want your land. FEMA Robbery in action. (psychopathinyourlife.com)

DAMS Create Droughts. WHY all the DAMS in Egypt Ethiopia Sudan Turkey Iraq & Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam? (psychopathinyourlife.com)

DAMS will DESTROY the RAINFOREST * Lula is a Lying TRANNY * Soil & Sediment Robbing of Nutrients and means to Survive = DAMS (psychopathinyourlife.com)

State-of-the-art dams, cascade reservoirs turn floods from beast into resource - Global Times

Hydroelectricity - Wikipedia

How Hydroelectric Power Works (tva.com)

How Is Electricity Generated From Hydroelectric Dams or Ocean Tides? - The Environmental Literacy Council (enviroliteracy.org)

Some things children need to do in an emergency and how their phones can help:

1. Call emergency services. Children should be taught to dial 911 or the appropriate emergency number on their phones. On many Android phones, pressing the power or side button five times in quick succession will start a countdown, after which the phone will call emergency services. On an iPhone, after pressing the side button five times, the "Emergency Call" option needs to be swiped to place the call.
2. Provide accurate information. Children need to be able to describe the situation and say where they are when they call 911.
3. Stay calm. It's important for children to remain calm and speak clearly when answering the 911 operator's questions.
4. Know their home address. Children should help memorize their home address, which can be written down on an emergency contact sheet.
5. Use a panic button. A panic button can be set up on a smart home device, such as a Philips Hue dimmer switch, to call specific numbers in the contact list.
6. Practice. Role-playing a 911 call with the child can help them practice.
7. Understand the risks. Children must be able to determine whether it is safe to call 911 from where they are. For example, they should be told to leave the house immediately if there is a fire.
8. Follow directions. Children should follow directions and help with activities like bringing toys and furniture inside to prevent them from blowing away.
9. Know basic first aid. Older children can be taught basic first aid techniques, but it's important to emphasize the importance of calling an ambulance first.
10. Have a safety plan. Children should know what to do in the case of fire, including agreed escape routes and meeting points.

1931 Central China Floods: The Deadliest Natural Disaster in Human History Region Affected

Yangtze River Basin (primarily)

• Also included the Yellow River, Huai River, and other tributaries in central and eastern China
• Provinces impacted: Hubei, Hunan, Jiangxi, Anhui, Jiangsu, and parts of Henan

• Cause: Converging Hydrological Extremes
• Unusual Spring Snowmelt from mountains
• Monsoon Rainfall: Over 24 inches (600 mm) of rain fell during July 1931
• Cyclones: A series of cyclones struck eastern China between July and August, intensifying rainfall
• Soil Saturation: The land was already saturated from above-average rainfall since late 1930

Scale of Flooding

• Nearly 70,000 square miles (≈180,000 km²) submerged
• The Yangtze River expanded to appear more like an inland sea than a river
• Some towns and cities were underwater for over 3 months
• Widespread destruction of levees, dikes, and embankments built during the Qing and Republican eras

• Death Toll
• Chinese government estimate (1930s): 2 million dead
• Modern scholarly estimates: 3.7 to 4 million people
• Includes flood-related drowning, famine, and disease outbreaks (especially cholera and dysentery)

Why Was the Impact So Catastrophic?

• No major flood control infrastructure existed at the time
• Poor communications and disaster relief coordination during the Republican era
• Large-scale deforestation and farming weakened watersheds
• Densely populated floodplains along the Yangtze worsened exposure
• Disease and starvation followed the physical flood damage

Response & Aftermath

• Nationalist government lacked resources to respond effectively
• Foreign aid (from missionary and Red Cross groups) was mobilized, but not at scale
• Sparked new thinking in China about:
• Hydraulic engineering
• Need for dams, levees, and hydropower infrastructure

Historical Legacy: Led to Future Mega-Dam Projects

• The devastation of 1931 helped lay the ideological foundation for:
• Three Gorges Dam (planned since 1950s, built 1994–2012)
• A national push for hydraulic modernization under Mao Zedong and later Deng Xiaoping
• Modern Context: How the Yangtze Flood System Has Changed

Factor 1931 Floods Modern Yangtze System Rainfall 24–30 inches in July alone Still susceptible to extreme monsoon rainfall Flood Protection Weak dikes, no large dams Massive dam system: Three Gorges, Gezhouba Death Toll 2–4 million Significantly reduced due to early warning, dams Risk Factors Deforestation, poor communication Urban overdevelopment, seismic risks Flood Area 70,000 mi² (180,000 km²) Modern dams reduce flooding but shift risks

• Lessons and Risks Today
• While dams have reduced downstream flood severity, they introduce new risks:
• Structural failure (due to seismicity, aging)
• Upstream landslides
• Reservoir-induced earthquakes
• Social displacement and environmental destruction
• Climate change and extreme rainfall still threaten the Yangtze basin, especially during monsoon months (June–August)

• Notable Modern Events Related to the Yangtze River
• 1998 Yangtze Floods: Over 3,000 dead; 14 million homeless
• 2020 Yangtze Flood Crisis: Tested the limits of the Three Gorges Dam
• Ongoing sedimentation and pollution concerns in the Three Gorges Reservoir

Three Gorges Dam – Major Concerns

1. Structural Cracks Shortly after its 2003 filling, inspectors detected around 80 hairline cracks in the dam. Officials stated they were repaired and within design tolerances, but critics doubt long-term durability.
2. Seismic Risks The dam sits atop the Jiuwanxi and Zigui–Badong faults. Water pressure changes have triggered hundreds of small tremors, and experts warn reservoir-induced seismicity could exacerbate fault instability
3. Landslides and Bank Erosion Rapid reservoir-level fluctuations have destabilized slopes. Over 4,600 landslide events were recorded in 11 months after initial filling; more than 7,400 hazard points have been identified since
4. Sedimentation and Water Pollution Slowed river flow traps silt, gravel, pollution, and industrial runoff. This has caused harbor blockages and water quality degradation. Managing sediment and pollution has required massive investments .
5. Ecosystem Decline The dam has disrupted fish migration, reduced downstream yields by up to 70%, and contributed to extinction of species like the baiji dolphin.
6. Social and Cultural Costs Between 1.1 and 1.4 million people were displaced, and nearly 1,300 archaeological sites were submerged. Resettlements often shifted residents to unstable, landslide-prone terrain.

How It Works with Other Yangtze River Dams

China operates a coordinated cascade of dams on the Yangtze and its tributaries for flood control, power, and navigation. The system includes major dams such as:

• Three Gorges Dam
• Gezhouba Dam (downstream, run-of-river, 2,715 MW)
• Wudongde, Xiluodu, Xiangjiaba, Baihetan (on the Jinsha River upstream)

Joint Operation Strategy:

• Flood control: Upstream dams retain peak flows during heavy rains, reducing downstream flood risks.
• Hydropower synergy: Coordinated release of water produces electricity while maintaining reservoir safety.
• Navigation stability: Controlled flows ensure consistent shipping levels below Gezhouba and Three Gorges.
• Environmental flow management: Gradual releases support downstream ecosystems, though balancing this with power generation remains complex .

Recent Performance:

• In summer floods (e.g., 2020), the system—including 47 dams—reduced peak flows by about 30%, securing flood protection equivalent to a 1-in-100-year event globaltimes.cn.

Summary

The Three Gorges Dam faces significant long-term challenges: structural integrity, seismic activity, landslides, sediment buildup, water pollution, ecosystem damage, and social displacement. It operates as the centerpiece of a vast, integrated dam system aimed at flood control, hydropower production, and navigation support. While the cascade has demonstrably reduced flood impacts, it comes with a high environmental, geological, and society issues.

How Power is Generated and Transmitted from Dams:

Water Flow & Turbines:

• The dam holds back a reservoir of water.
• When water is released from the reservoir, it flows through intake tunnels or penstocks (large pipes) down to turbines.
• The force of flowing water spins the turbines.

Turbines Drive Generators:

• Each turbine is connected to an electrical generator.
• As the turbine spins, it turns the generator rotor, converting mechanical energy into electrical energy via electromagnetic induction.

Powerhouse / Power Station:

• The powerhouse is the facility built at the dam where turbines and generators are housed.
• The electricity generated here is typically at a medium voltage (e.g., 11kV to 33kV).

Step-Up Transformers:

• Near the powerhouse, transformers step up (increase) the voltage to a higher transmission voltage (e.g., 69kV, 138kV, or higher).
• Higher voltage reduces energy loss when electricity is sent over long distances.

Transmission Lines:

• The high-voltage electricity is carried away from the dam via overhead or underground transmission lines.
• These lines connect to the regional or national electric grid.

Substations and Step-Down Transformers:

• Near populated areas or industrial users, substations reduce voltage to safer levels for distribution.
• Distribution lines then deliver the power to homes, businesses, and industries.

Summary:

• The dam’s powerhouse is the actual power station where mechanical energy from flowing water becomes electrical energy.
• The power generated there is stepped up by transformers to high voltages for transmission.
• High-voltage power lines carry electricity from the dam’s power station to substations and eventually to end users.

The disaster in Texas is severe flash flooding along the Guadalupe River in central Texas, not a dam collapse. Here's the detailed situation:

What is the same? North Carolina had a dam overflow. Texas - also near a dam. China is now in a disaster zone from rain and DAMs in the area. Dams are sitting time bombs; they have a long history. What happens is quite simple, they create a lot of rain, the dams get full, and WHOOPS they have to release the excess water, flooding out people and things in the path.

REPORT: DAMS, FLASH FLOODS & WEATHER MODIFICATION CONNECTIONS

Event: July 2025 Texas Flood Disaster

Dams on the Upper Guadalupe River

Canyon Dam / Canyon Lake

• Type: Rolled-earth flood-control dam with hydroelectric capacity
• Construction: 1958–1964; lake filled to conservation level by 1968

Ingram Dam

• Type: Low-head spillway dam (earth-fill, ~20 ft high)
• Construction date: Not specified, but in place by the 2000s (has monitoring records from at least 2008) gvlakes.com

Kerrville Lake Dam (Center Point Lake Dam)

• Type: Earth dam (~20 ft high)
• Built: 1956

Kerrville Ponding Dam

• Type: Rock/soil dam (~35 ft high) with outlet gates
• Built: 1980

Dams on the Lower Guadalupe River (GBRA-managed Hydroelectric Reservoirs)

(All transferred to GBRA management in 1963; dams built 1928–1932)

Lake McQueeney Dam

• Built: 1927–1928
• Type: Hydroelectric reservoir dam

Lake Placid Dam

Meadow Lake Dam (Lake Nolte)

• Constructed: 1931
• Type: Hydroelectric reservoir dam.

Lake Wood Dam

• Built: 1931
• Type: Hydroelectric reservoir dam.

Lake Gonzales Dam

• • Built: 1928–1932 (exact year unspecified)

Lake Dunlap Dam

• • Built: 1928–1932 (same period)

Additional Historic Dam

• Saffold Dam (Max Starcke Dam) – Seguin

• Built: originally ~1853 (natural outcropping), expanded in 1938 during park development
• Purpose: Mill and early hydroelectric power.

Summary Table Dam Name Location Built Type Canyon Dam Above New Braunfels 1958–1964 Flood-control rolled-earth Ingram Dam Near Kerrville Pre-2000s Low-head spillway Kerrville Lake Dam Near Kerrville 1956 Earth dam Kerrville Ponding Dam Near Kerrville 1980 Rock/soil with outlet gates Lake McQueeney Dam West of Seguin 1927–1928 Hydroelectric reservoir Lake Placid Dam Near Seguin 1928 Hydroelectric reservoir Meadow Lake Dam (Lake Nolte) Near Seguin 1931 Hydroelectric reservoir Lake Wood Dam Gonzales County 1931 Hydroelectric reservoir Lake Gonzales Dam Guadalupe County 1928–1932 Hydroelectric reservoir Lake Dunlap Dam Guadalupe County 1928–1932 Hydroelectric reservoir Saffold Dam (Seguin) Seguin 1853/1938 Historic mill & hydro dam

Section 1: Overview – Texas Hill Country Flash Flood

Location: Kerr County, Texas (Hunt to Kerrville, along the Guadalupe River) Date: July 3–4, 2025

Primary Event:

• A stalled storm system dumped up to 15 inches of rain over the Hill Country in just a few hours.
• The Guadalupe River surged over 20 feet in under 2 hours, cresting at near-record heights of 29 feet at Hunt.
• Flash flood emergency issued by the National Weather Service at ~4:00 a.m. on July 4.

Impact:

• Widespread devastation downstream, especially at summer camps like Camp Mystic.
• At least 78 people dead, including many children; over 40 missing.

Key Point: This was not a dam collapse, but rather extreme flash flooding triggered by a high-volume rain event.

Section 2: Dams in the Kerrville/Ingram Region

Major Dams Involved or Nearby:

Canyon Dam (Creates Canyon Lake)

Type: Large rolled-earth flood-control dam

Built: 1958–1964 by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Function: Flood control, water supply, hydroelectricity, recreation

July 2025 Status:

1. Lake rose ~10 ft to 888 ft (well below spillway threshold of 909 ft)

1. No uncontrolled overflow

1. Controlled releases were initiated around July 5–6 to manage lake elevation

1. Ingram Dam

Type: Small, low-head, 20-foot earth dam near Kerrville

Status:

Overtopped on July 4 — water flowed over the top due to heavy rainfall

No structural breach

No intentional release — a passive overflow, not a failure

Did contribute to downstream surge

Kerrville Lake Dam (Center Point Lake Dam)

Earth dam, ~20 feet high, built in 1956

For flood control and recreation

Not implicated in failure

Kerrville Ponding Dam

1. Small, 35-foot-high rock/soil dam with outlet gates

1. Built in 1980

1. For irrigation and water supply

Other Dams Downstream (Managed by GBRA)

These are hydroelectric, recreational, and minor flood-control structures:

• Lake Dunlap (failed in 2019, rebuilt by 2023)
• Lake McQueeney
• Lake Placid
• Meadow Lake

Section 3: Dam Performance – Key Timeline & Facts

Canyon Dam (Main Flood Control Dam)

• July 4–5: Lake rose 6–10 ft due to rain; reached 883–888 ft
• July 5–6: Controlled outflow released (~72.6–106 cfs)
• Purpose: Prevent spillover by lowering pressure on the dam
• Result: Helped manage flood risk, did not cause flood
• Last spillway overflow event: July 2002

Ingram Dam (Low-Head Structure)

• July 4, 2025 ~4:00 a.m.: Overtopped due to flash flood surge

• Status: Remained intact

• No gates opened; no breach

• Effect: Sudden overflow contributed to surge toward Kerrville and Hunt

Section 4: What Caused the Flood?

Main Cause:

• A stalled storm dumped 10–15 inches of rain in hours

• Upstream creeks and tributaries overflowed into the Guadalupe River

• River levels rose 26–29 ft in a flash flood event, overwhelming all local infrastructure

Not Caused By:

• No dam breached

• No dam released water intentionally to cause harm

• Controlled release from Canyon Dam was minor in comparison to rainfall totals

Misconceptions Addressed:

• Social media rumors falsely blamed intentional dam releases
• Authorities confirmed no gates were opened at Ingram
• Canyon Dam functioned as designed, helping prevent even worse damage

Section 5: Summary Verdict on Dams

• Canyon Dam: No breach, no overflow. Released small, controlled outflows. Performed well.

• Ingram Dam: Overtopped due to rain but did not structurally fail.

• Flood Cause: Extreme rainfall, not dam malfunction or manipulation.

Section 6: Global Context – Dam Risks in China

Three Gorges Dam: Major Structural & Environmental Issues

Risk Category Details Cracks Detected 80+ hairline cracks after initial reservoir filling (2003) Seismic Risk Built near active faults; linked to reservoir-induced earthquakes Landslides & Bank Erosion 4,600+ landslides in first 11 months after filling Sedimentation Massive sediment buildup reduces capacity, degrades water quality Ecosystem Decline Fish migration blocked; several species extinct Social Cost 1.1–1.4 million displaced; 1,300 archaeological sites submerged

How It Works with Other Dams:

• Part of a 47-dam coordinated cascade along the Yangtze and tributaries

• Works with: Gezhouba, Xiangjiaba, Baihetan, Wudongde, Xiluodu, etc.

• Joint Strategy: Flood control, hydropower, sediment management, navigation

• 2020 Floods: Reduced peak flows by ~30%, avoiding greater disaster

Section 7: Global Pattern – Dam-Driven Flood Complexity

Observations:

• North Carolina: Recent dam overflow incident

• China: Major dam zone hit by extreme rain

• Texas: Flash flooding near multiple dams

• Pattern:

• Excessive rainfall (natural or possibly engineered) fills reservoirs

• When water must be released or overtops spillways, it creates destructive downstream surges

• Dams are both flood-control assets and potential amplifiers of disaster when overwhelmed

Section 8: Weather Modification Patents (Historical)

A long list of official U.S. weather modification patents exists, dating back to the 19th century:

Year Patent # Title 1891 US462795A Method of producing rainfall 1920 US1338343A Artificial fog/mist production 1946 US2395827A Airplane spray unit (U.S. Dept. of Agriculture) 1951 US2550324A Process for controlling weather 1952 US2582678A Disseminating material from aircraft 1964 US3126155A Silver iodide cloud seeding generator 1969 US3429507A Rainmaker 2001 US20030085296A1 Hurricane and tornado control device …and many more spanning fog dispersal, chemtrails, cloud seeding, and atmospheric manipulation.

Conclusion

• The July 2025 flood in Texas was not caused by dam failure or intentional release, but by record rainfall in a flood-prone region.

• Canyon Dam and Ingram Dam remained intact; the latter was overtopped passively.

• A pattern of extreme rain near dams worldwide (Texas, North Carolina, China) has raised serious questions about how these systems interact with both natural and possibly manipulated weather phenomena.
• The presence of weather modification patents supports further inquiry into whether some rainfall events may be amplified by artificial means.

Weather Modification Patents

YEAR - PATENT NUMBER - PATENT NAME

• 1891 – US462795A – method of producing rainfall

• 1914 – US1103490A – rain maker (balloon images)

• 1917 – US1225521A – protection from poisonous gas in warfare

• 1920 – US1338343A – process and apparatus for the production of intense artificial clouds, fogs, or mists

• 1924 – US1512783A – composition for dispelling fogs

• 1927 – US1619183A – process of producing smoke clouds from moving aircraft

• 1928 – US1665267A – process of producting artificial fogs

• 1932 – US1892132A – atomizing attachment for airplane engine exhausts

• 1933 – US1928963A – electrical system and method (for spraying chemtrails)

• 1934 – US1957075A – airplane spray equipment

• 1936 – US2045865A – skywriting apparatus

• 1936 – US2052626A – method of dispelling fog (mit)

• 1937 – US2068987A – process of dissipating fog

• 1939 – US2160900A – method for vapor clearing

• 1941 – US2232728A – method and composition for dispelling vapors

• 1941 – US2257360A – desensitized pentaerythritol tetranitrate explosive

• 1946 – US2395827A – airplane spray unit (us. dept. of agriculture)

• 1946 – US2409201A – smoke-producing mixture

• 1949 – US2476171A – smoke screen generator

• 1949 – US2480967A – aerial discharge device

• 1950 – US2527230A – method of crystal formation and precipitation

• 1951 – US2550324A – process for controlling weather

• 1951 – US2570867A – method of crystal formation and precipitation (general electric)

• 1952 – US2582678A – material disseminating apparatus for airplanes

• 1952 – US2591988A – production of tio2 pigments (dupont)

• 1952 – US2614083A – metal chloride screening smoke mixture

• 1953 – US2633455A – smoke generator

• 1954 – US2688069A – steam generator

• 1955 – US2721495A – method and apparatus for detecting minute crystal forming particles suspended in a gaseous atmosphere (general electric)

• 1956 – US2730402A – controllable dispersal device

• 1957 – US2801322A – decomposition chamber for monopropellant fuel

• 1958 – US2835530A – process for the condensation of atmospheric humidity and dissolution of fog

• 1959 – US2881335A – generation of electrical fields (haarp – for re-charging clouds!)

• 1959 – US2903188A – control of tropical cyclone formation

• 1959 – US2908442A – method for dispersing natural atmospheric fogs and clouds

• 1960 – US2962450A – fog dispelling composition (see references)

• 1960 – US2963975A – cloud seeding carbon dioxide bullet

• 1961 – US2986360A – aerial insecticide dusting device

• 1962 – US3044911A – propellant system

• 1962 – US3056556A – method of artificially influencing the weather

• 1964 – US3120459A – composite incendiary powder containing metal coated oxidizing salts

• 1964 – US3126155A – silver iodide cloud seeding generator (main commercial ingredient)

• 1964 – US3127107A – generation of ice-nucleating crystals

• 1964 – US3131131A – electrostatic mixing in microbial conversions

• 1965 – US3174150A – self-focusing antenna system (haarp)

• 1966 – US3257801A – pyrotechnic composition comprising solid oxidizer, boron and aluminum additive and binder

• 1966 – US3234357A – electrically heated smoke producing device

• 1966 – US3274035A – metallic composition for production of hydroscopic smoke

• 1967 – US3300721A – means for communication through a layer of ionized gases (haarp)

• 1967 – US3313487A – cloud seeding apparatus

• 1967 – US3338476A – heating device for use with aerosol containers

• 1968 – US3410489A – automatically adjustable airfoil spray system with pump

• 1969 – US3429507A – rainmaker

• 1969 – US3430533A – aircraft dispensor pod having self-sealing ejection tubes

• 1969 – US3432208A – fluidized particle dispenser (us air force)

• 1969 – US3437502A – titanium dioxide pigment coated with silica and aluminum (dupont)

• 1969 – US3441214A – method and apparatus for seeding clouds

• 2001 -US20030085296A1 - Hurricane and tornado control device