Artwork

Content provided by [email protected] (Gustavo Barra) and Gustavo Barra. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by [email protected] (Gustavo Barra) and Gustavo Barra or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

️ 66: Mainstreaming Clinical Genetic Testing — A Conceptual Framework

20:02
 
Share
 

Manage episode 499155896 series 3682575
Content provided by [email protected] (Gustavo Barra) and Gustavo Barra. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by [email protected] (Gustavo Barra) and Gustavo Barra or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.

Episode 66: Mainstreaming Clinical Genetic Testing — A Conceptual Framework

In this episode of Base por Base, we delve into the consensus-based framework introduced by Mackley et al. (2025) in Genetics in Medicine, which proposes a structured approach to integrate genetic testing into non-geneticist clinical practice to meet growing demand amid a stable genetics workforce .

Study Highlights:
The authors convened a focus group of thirty-five experts representing twenty clinical genetics services across Canada to define “mainstreaming,” map the diagnostic care pathway into assessment, pre-testing, laboratory, and post-testing stages, and identify key variables influencing model selection . The framework outlines six categories of variables—patient characteristics, disease features, test complexity, clinician expertise, report design, and health-system context—that determine the appropriateness of different mainstreaming models . It describes four generalizable models—“to-test,” “to-result,” “to-navigation,” and fully mainstreamed—that reflect progressively shifting responsibilities from the genetics service to non-geneticist clinicians . Designed for adaptability, the taxonomy facilitates standardized evaluation of accessibility, sustainability, diagnostic yield, and patient satisfaction across diverse clinical settings .

Conclusion:
This conceptual framework provides a unified roadmap for designing, implementing, and evaluating mainstreaming initiatives in clinical genetics, optimizing scopes of practice while improving patient access to genomics-informed care .

Reference:
Mackley MP, Richer J, Guerin A, et al. Mainstreaming of clinical genetic testing: a conceptual framework. Genetics in Medicine. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2025.101465

License:
This episode is based on an open access article published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license – https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

  continue reading

117 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 499155896 series 3682575
Content provided by [email protected] (Gustavo Barra) and Gustavo Barra. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by [email protected] (Gustavo Barra) and Gustavo Barra or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.

Episode 66: Mainstreaming Clinical Genetic Testing — A Conceptual Framework

In this episode of Base por Base, we delve into the consensus-based framework introduced by Mackley et al. (2025) in Genetics in Medicine, which proposes a structured approach to integrate genetic testing into non-geneticist clinical practice to meet growing demand amid a stable genetics workforce .

Study Highlights:
The authors convened a focus group of thirty-five experts representing twenty clinical genetics services across Canada to define “mainstreaming,” map the diagnostic care pathway into assessment, pre-testing, laboratory, and post-testing stages, and identify key variables influencing model selection . The framework outlines six categories of variables—patient characteristics, disease features, test complexity, clinician expertise, report design, and health-system context—that determine the appropriateness of different mainstreaming models . It describes four generalizable models—“to-test,” “to-result,” “to-navigation,” and fully mainstreamed—that reflect progressively shifting responsibilities from the genetics service to non-geneticist clinicians . Designed for adaptability, the taxonomy facilitates standardized evaluation of accessibility, sustainability, diagnostic yield, and patient satisfaction across diverse clinical settings .

Conclusion:
This conceptual framework provides a unified roadmap for designing, implementing, and evaluating mainstreaming initiatives in clinical genetics, optimizing scopes of practice while improving patient access to genomics-informed care .

Reference:
Mackley MP, Richer J, Guerin A, et al. Mainstreaming of clinical genetic testing: a conceptual framework. Genetics in Medicine. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2025.101465

License:
This episode is based on an open access article published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license – https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

  continue reading

117 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play