Player FM - Internet Radio Done Right
18 subscribers
Checked 2h ago
Added four years ago
Content provided by Bobby Capucci. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Bobby Capucci or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!
Go offline with the Player FM app!
Podcasts Worth a Listen
SPONSORED
S
Squid Game: The Official Podcast


Squid Game is back—and this time, the knives are out. In the thrilling Season 3 premiere, Player 456 is spiraling and a brutal round of hide-and-seek forces players to kill or be killed. Hosts Phil Yu and Kiera Please break down Gi-hun’s descent into vengeance, Guard 011’s daring betrayal of the Game, and the shocking moment players are forced to choose between murdering their friends… or dying. Then, Carlos Juico and Gavin Ruta from the Jumpers Jump podcast join us to unpack their wild theories for the season. Plus, Phil and Kiera face off in a high-stakes round of “Hot Sweet Potato.” SPOILER ALERT! Make sure you watch Squid Game Season 3 Episode 1 before listening on. Play one last time. IG - @SquidGameNetflix X (f.k.a. Twitter) - @SquidGame Check out more from Phil Yu @angryasianman , Kiera Please @kieraplease and the Jumpers Jump podcast Listen to more from Netflix Podcasts . Squid Game: The Official Podcast is produced by Netflix and The Mash-Up Americans.…
Mega Edition: Judge Arun Subramanian Opinion And Order On Diddy's Privileged Material Claim (5/21/25)
Manage episode 484014358 series 2987886
Content provided by Bobby Capucci. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Bobby Capucci or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
In an Opinion and Order issued by U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, the court addressed the handling of Sean "Diddy" Combs’s notes seized during a Bureau of Prisons (BOP) sweep at the Metropolitan Detention Center between October 28, 2024, and November 1, 2024. During the operation, a BOP investigator, referred to as Investigator-1, took photographs of nineteen pages of Combs’s handwritten notes and sent them to the Government’s filter team. The filter team is composed of Assistant U.S. Attorneys (AUSAs) who are not involved in the prosecution of the case. Their role was to review and redact any privileged or irrelevant material before passing the documents to the prosecution team.
The case team, which includes the agents and AUSAs directly responsible for investigating and prosecuting Combs, received the redacted notes from the filter team. This procedural safeguard is meant to ensure that privileged or irrelevant information is not improperly accessed by prosecutors handling the case. The ruling underscores the court’s scrutiny over how seized evidence is handled, particularly when it involves sensitive materials belonging to the defendant. The order may influence future legal arguments about attorney-client privilege, due process, and the integrity of the prosecution’s access to evidence in this high-profile case.
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.148.0_1.pdf
…
continue reading
The case team, which includes the agents and AUSAs directly responsible for investigating and prosecuting Combs, received the redacted notes from the filter team. This procedural safeguard is meant to ensure that privileged or irrelevant information is not improperly accessed by prosecutors handling the case. The ruling underscores the court’s scrutiny over how seized evidence is handled, particularly when it involves sensitive materials belonging to the defendant. The order may influence future legal arguments about attorney-client privilege, due process, and the integrity of the prosecution’s access to evidence in this high-profile case.
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.148.0_1.pdf
1101 episodes
Manage episode 484014358 series 2987886
Content provided by Bobby Capucci. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Bobby Capucci or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
In an Opinion and Order issued by U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, the court addressed the handling of Sean "Diddy" Combs’s notes seized during a Bureau of Prisons (BOP) sweep at the Metropolitan Detention Center between October 28, 2024, and November 1, 2024. During the operation, a BOP investigator, referred to as Investigator-1, took photographs of nineteen pages of Combs’s handwritten notes and sent them to the Government’s filter team. The filter team is composed of Assistant U.S. Attorneys (AUSAs) who are not involved in the prosecution of the case. Their role was to review and redact any privileged or irrelevant material before passing the documents to the prosecution team.
The case team, which includes the agents and AUSAs directly responsible for investigating and prosecuting Combs, received the redacted notes from the filter team. This procedural safeguard is meant to ensure that privileged or irrelevant information is not improperly accessed by prosecutors handling the case. The ruling underscores the court’s scrutiny over how seized evidence is handled, particularly when it involves sensitive materials belonging to the defendant. The order may influence future legal arguments about attorney-client privilege, due process, and the integrity of the prosecution’s access to evidence in this high-profile case.
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.148.0_1.pdf
…
continue reading
The case team, which includes the agents and AUSAs directly responsible for investigating and prosecuting Combs, received the redacted notes from the filter team. This procedural safeguard is meant to ensure that privileged or irrelevant information is not improperly accessed by prosecutors handling the case. The ruling underscores the court’s scrutiny over how seized evidence is handled, particularly when it involves sensitive materials belonging to the defendant. The order may influence future legal arguments about attorney-client privilege, due process, and the integrity of the prosecution’s access to evidence in this high-profile case.
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.148.0_1.pdf
1101 episodes
All episodes
×B
Beyond The Horizon

1 Virginia Roberts Responds Ghislaine Maxwell's Motion For A Summary Judgement (Parts 5-6) (8/11/25) 31:46
31:46
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked31:46
Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre’s legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein’s trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims. Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre’s legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein’s trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Giuffre-unseal.pdf (courthousenews.com)…
B
Beyond The Horizon

1 Former Art Students Confirm Maria Farmers Account Of The New Mexico Trip 19:09
19:09
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked19:09
When several art students came forward to corroborate Maria Farmer’s account of her trip to Jeffrey Epstein’s New Mexico compound with Ghislaine Maxwell, their testimony should have been a turning point. It was independent, credible, and detailed—precisely the kind of supporting evidence that, in a just system, strengthens a survivor’s case. Yet, in the rarefied air of high society, truth is often treated as a nuisance rather than a compass. The corroboration was met with the same pattern of silence, dismissal, and selective blindness that always seems to emerge when accusations target the powerful. The goal wasn’t to disprove the art students—it was to make their voices irrelevant. Their accounts undercut the “he said, she said” defense that Maxwell’s defenders quietly leaned on, yet the institutions and individuals capable of acting on the information showed no urgency to do so. That’s because acknowledging the art students meant acknowledging that Maria Farmer’s accusations were not isolated, but part of a broader and corroborated pattern of abuse. In high society, that’s dangerous—because one open door of truth often leads to an entire hallway of scandal. Instead of embracing the credibility these witnesses brought, the powerful chose to bury it under the weight of their own self-preservation, proving once again that truth does not topple power unless power allows it. (Commercial at 13:04) To contact me: Bobbycapucci@protonmail.com Source: https://www.google.com/amp/s/news.artnet.com/art-world/epstein-ranch-art-students-1760265/amp-page…
B
Beyond The Horizon

1 Ghislaine Maxwell Was Still Rubbing Shoulders With The So Called Elite After Allegations 28:21
28:21
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked28:21
Even after Jeffrey Epstein’s 2008 conviction, Ghislaine Maxwell continued to receive invitations to dinners, galas, and gatherings among the same elite circles that claimed to be horrified by his crimes. This wasn’t oversight—it was the quiet acknowledgment that her connections, influence, and social capital still outweighed the stain of her association. For many in high society, Maxwell wasn’t a liability; she was a gatekeeper to an exclusive network, someone who could still open doors, raise funds, and make introductions. The whispered rationale was simple: as long as she hadn’t been personally convicted, she remained “safe” to be seen with. It was a textbook example of how privilege allows reputations to be insulated far beyond the point where ordinary people would be cast out. Her continued presence in elite settings revealed that, in those circles, association with scandal is not a dealbreaker—it’s a test of loyalty. Inviting Maxwell wasn’t ignorance, it was defiance; a way for the powerful to signal that they don’t bend to public outrage or moral pressure. To them, ostracizing her would have meant acknowledging that the accusations against Epstein and his network had real weight—and that the social class they all belonged to was implicated. Instead, Maxwell was treated as one of their own until it became politically untenable, proving once again that high society’s first instinct is not to cleanse itself, but to protect and preserve its own. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2904115/Ghislaine-Maxwell-s-link-sex-scandal-court-papers-involving-Prince-Andrew-Jeffery-Epstein-don-t-stop-having-amazing-social-connections.html…
B
Beyond The Horizon

1 The Guidelines Of Jeffrey Epstein And The So Called Elite 26:37
26:37
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked26:37
Power—especially in so-called “high society”—is inherently self-protective. The wealthy and well-connected operate in a closed loop where influence is currency, and the stakes are too high to let one of their own fall. Scandals are contained, evidence is buried, and narratives are rewritten through media allies, legal teams, and political connections. When someone inside this sphere is accused of wrongdoing, the machinery of protection activates instantly—redirecting blame, discrediting accusers, and leveraging every institution that can be bent to their will. It’s not about innocence or guilt—it’s about preserving the brand, the network, and the status that their entire existence depends on. In high society, reputation isn’t just social capital—it’s armor. That armor is reinforced by money, influence, and shared secrets that ensure silence among peers. Accountability is treated not as a moral obligation, but as an existential threat to the entire class. Even when a figure is publicly sacrificed, it’s almost always to shield the rest of the group and close the wound before more light can get in. The public sees a fall from grace; insiders see a calculated move to protect the structure itself. This is why corruption at the top is rarely punished proportionally—because the system isn’t designed to police power, it’s designed to preserve it. (commercial at 20:54) To contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com Source: https://www.fairobserver.com/region/north_america/peter-isackson-alex-acosta-federal-prosecutor-jeffrey-epstein-case-us-american-world-news-79671/…
B
Beyond The Horizon

1 Gerald Marie And The Allegations Against Him And Elite Modeling 13:57
13:57
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked13:57
Gerald Marie was a big shot in the modeling game. With the power to help propel a career into the next level, he instead used that power according to allegations in many instances to abuse instead. In this episode, we hear from a whistleblower who spills the beans on the toxic culture around Gerald Marie and Elite Modeling. (commercial at 9:35) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9558771/Predator-bosses-Elite-modelling-agency-league-table-models-slept-with.html…
B
Beyond The Horizon

1 How 'High Society' Rolled Out The Red Carpet For Jeffrey Epstein 11:43
11:43
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked11:43
High society in New York City embraced Jeffrey Epstein with open arms, not in spite of his reputation, but because of his perceived wealth, connections, and elitist mystique. Epstein was a fixture at galas, dinner parties, and charity events, rubbing shoulders with billionaires, media moguls, Ivy League academics, and even royalty. He was treated as an intellectual financier with a private jet and a Rolodex that included presidents and Nobel laureates. Manhattan’s social elite didn't just tolerate him—they invited him in, granting him access to the city’s most exclusive rooms, often overlooking or dismissing the disturbing rumors swirling around him. His presence was seen as a social asset, not a liability, and that blind spot helped shield him for decades. Even after his 2008 conviction for soliciting sex from a minor, many in New York’s elite circles remained silent or continued associating with him. Powerful individuals who claimed to value social justice, women’s rights, or public morality had no problem sitting at Epstein’s table or accepting his donations. His townhouse on East 71st Street became a symbol of this hypocrisy—a place where the rich and influential gathered, even as it doubled as a crime scene. The refusal of New York’s elite to disavow him until it became socially untenable underscores a culture where money and proximity to power trumped basic decency. Epstein thrived not in the shadows—but in the very heart of high society, protected by a willful blindness that still hasn’t been fully reckoned with.…
B
Beyond The Horizon

1 In Their Own Words: Jane Doe 101 And The Allegations Made Against Epstein In 2009 (Part 2) (8/10/25) 19:50
19:50
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked19:50
The 2009 federal lawsuit Jane Doe No. 101 v. Jeffrey Epstein, filed in the Southern District of Florida, accuses Epstein of sexually abusing and trafficking the plaintiff when she was a minor in Palm Beach County. Filed under a pseudonym to protect her identity, the complaint outlines a pattern of predatory conduct consistent with other allegations against Epstein during the same period. It asserts federal jurisdiction, establishes venue in Florida, and demands a jury trial. Early filings also sought a no-contact order and measures to preserve evidence, signaling the seriousness of the claims and the plaintiff’s intent to prevent witness intimidation or evidence tampering. The case emerged alongside a wave of similar “Jane Doe” suits that were being coordinated in federal court, reflecting the widening legal fallout for Epstein at the time. The complaint fits within the broader narrative of civil actions that sought to hold Epstein accountable after his controversial 2008 plea deal allowed him to avoid federal prosecution. By placing this new plaintiff’s claims into the public record, the suit added further pressure on Epstein’s legal defenses and contributed to the mounting body of litigation alleging he operated a long-running sex trafficking network targeting underage girls. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: gov.uscourts.flsd.334533.1.0.pdf…
B
Beyond The Horizon

1 In Their Own Words: Jane Doe 101 And The Allegations Made Against Epstein In 2009 (Part 1) (8/10/25) 14:36
14:36
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked14:36
The 2009 federal lawsuit Jane Doe No. 101 v. Jeffrey Epstein, filed in the Southern District of Florida, accuses Epstein of sexually abusing and trafficking the plaintiff when she was a minor in Palm Beach County. Filed under a pseudonym to protect her identity, the complaint outlines a pattern of predatory conduct consistent with other allegations against Epstein during the same period. It asserts federal jurisdiction, establishes venue in Florida, and demands a jury trial. Early filings also sought a no-contact order and measures to preserve evidence, signaling the seriousness of the claims and the plaintiff’s intent to prevent witness intimidation or evidence tampering. The case emerged alongside a wave of similar “Jane Doe” suits that were being coordinated in federal court, reflecting the widening legal fallout for Epstein at the time. The complaint fits within the broader narrative of civil actions that sought to hold Epstein accountable after his controversial 2008 plea deal allowed him to avoid federal prosecution. By placing this new plaintiff’s claims into the public record, the suit added further pressure on Epstein’s legal defenses and contributed to the mounting body of litigation alleging he operated a long-running sex trafficking network targeting underage girls. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: gov.uscourts.flsd.334533.1.0.pdf…
B
Beyond The Horizon

1 Jeffrey Epstein's Butler In Paris Talks About His Former Boss For The First Time (8/10/25) 12:45
12:45
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked12:45
Valdson Cotrin, who managed Epstein’s Paris residence for 18 years, publicly challenged the official ruling that Epstein died by suicide in his Manhattan jail cell in August 2019. He insisted that Epstein “loved life too much” to have taken his own life and believed his boss was intent on negotiating bail. Cotrin expressed fear for his own safety, citing the mysterious deaths of individuals tied to the case—including accuser Virginia Giuffre and modeling agent Jean‑Luc Brunel—as cause for concern. Beyond doubts about Epstein’s death, Cotrin painted a picture of Epstein as deeply connected within elite circles. He made striking claims—including that Epstein told him Trump offered him a job in his administration, which Epstein declined, and recalling Ghislaine Maxwell as the true authority in his household. Cotrin also recounted memorable moments, such as collecting Epstein from the Paris airport and encountering Bill Clinton, describing the experience as intimidating—he "was trembling"—and confirmed he retains photographs of himself with both Epstein and Clinton, despite claiming he never witnessed the criminal behavior Epstein was accused of. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Jeffrey Epstein 'loved life too much' to kill himself and must have been murdered, his butler says as he spills the beans on everyone who visited - from Prince Andrew to Bill Clinton | Daily Mail Online…
B
Beyond The Horizon

1 Virginia Roberts Responds Ghislaine Maxwell's Motion For A Summary Judgement (Parts 3-4) (8/10/25) 37:48
37:48
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked37:48
Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre’s legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein’s trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims. Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre’s legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein’s trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Giuffre-unseal.pdf (courthousenews.com)…
B
Beyond The Horizon

1 Virginia Roberts Responds Ghislaine Maxwell's Motion For A Summary Judgement (Parts 1-2) (8/10/25) 26:55
26:55
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked26:55
Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre’s legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein’s trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims. Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre’s legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein’s trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Giuffre-unseal.pdf (courthousenews.com)…
B
Beyond The Horizon

1 Mega Edition: The Brief Filed In Support Of Ghislaine Maxwell And A Summary Judgement (Part 3-5) (8/10/25) 42:12
42:12
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked42:12
In the defamation case Virginia Giuffre brought against Ghislaine Maxwell beginning in 2015, Maxwell responded with a motion for summary judgment—arguing that Giuffre’s allegations were not legally defamatory and that Maxwell was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. That motion aimed to avoid a trial by asserting that even if all of Giuffre’s allegations were true, they did not meet the legal threshold for defamation. The motion, along with supporting documents, was filed under seal during pre-trial proceedings. Ultimately, the district court did not grant the motion, and the case was later settled out of court under confidentiality terms in 2017. When third parties later moved to unseal portions of the sealed record, particularly filings related to the summary judgment motion, the courts determined that these materials were judicial documents subject to a strong presumption of public access. A federal appeals court ordered their partial release because Maxwell had not shown sufficient reasons to overcome the public’s right of access. In other words, although Maxwell sought to dispose of the case quietly and legally via summary judgment—and shield that process from public view—those efforts were rejected, and important portions of the case were ultimately made part of the public record. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Epstein Docs - DocumentCloud…
B
Beyond The Horizon

1 Mega Edition: The Brief Filed In Support Of Ghislaine Maxwell And A Summary Judgement (Part 1-2) (8/10/25) 24:16
24:16
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked24:16
In the defamation case Virginia Giuffre brought against Ghislaine Maxwell beginning in 2015, Maxwell responded with a motion for summary judgment—arguing that Giuffre’s allegations were not legally defamatory and that Maxwell was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. That motion aimed to avoid a trial by asserting that even if all of Giuffre’s allegations were true, they did not meet the legal threshold for defamation. The motion, along with supporting documents, was filed under seal during pre-trial proceedings. Ultimately, the district court did not grant the motion, and the case was later settled out of court under confidentiality terms in 2017. When third parties later moved to unseal portions of the sealed record, particularly filings related to the summary judgment motion, the courts determined that these materials were judicial documents subject to a strong presumption of public access. A federal appeals court ordered their partial release because Maxwell had not shown sufficient reasons to overcome the public’s right of access. In other words, although Maxwell sought to dispose of the case quietly and legally via summary judgment—and shield that process from public view—those efforts were rejected, and important portions of the case were ultimately made part of the public record. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Epstein Docs - DocumentCloud…
B
Beyond The Horizon

1 Jeffrey Epstein And The Long Battle For Transparency In Palm Beach Florida 15:04
15:04
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked15:04
For nearly two decades, the fight for transparency in Palm Beach surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes has been a bitter, drawn-out war between survivors, local advocates, and a system seemingly designed to protect the powerful. Despite Epstein’s 2008 conviction for soliciting a minor, the full scope of his trafficking operation remained largely hidden, thanks in part to a highly controversial non-prosecution agreement negotiated in secret by federal prosecutors and approved with no input from his victims. Palm Beach County law enforcement initially sought serious charges, but their efforts were gutted by a backdoor deal that allowed Epstein to serve a lenient sentence in a private wing of the jail—with work release privileges that enabled him to continue his abuse. For years, public records were sealed, law enforcement agencies stonewalled inquiries, and the legal system prioritized shielding reputations over serving justice. To contact me; bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: https://www.palmbeachpost.com/story/news/2022/03/05/jeffrey-epstein-grand-jury-records-wont-released-florida-legislature-year/9382566002/…
B
Beyond The Horizon

1 The Swing And Miss Known As The Epstein OIG Report 11:25
11:25
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked11:25
The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2019 death concluded that his death was the result of suicide by hanging and attributed the failures leading up to it to gross negligence, understaffing, and systemic incompetence at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York. The report cited numerous violations of protocol, including broken security cameras, falsified logs, and inattentive guards who were allegedly browsing the internet instead of checking on Epstein. It acknowledged that Epstein should never have been removed from suicide watch and that his cellmate had been inexplicably transferred the night before his death. While the OIG faulted the Bureau of Prisons for widespread mismanagement, it ultimately found no criminal conspiracy or outside foul play. Despite its official conclusions, the report left glaring holes that continue to fuel widespread skepticism. It failed to explain how one of the most high-profile inmates in the federal system—who had allegedly attempted suicide weeks earlier and had damaging information on powerful individuals—was left entirely unsupervised in a cell with malfunctioning cameras and bedsheets strong enough to hang himself. The absence of forensic clarity, the refusal to address Epstein’s connections to intelligence agencies or influential elites, and the fact that key witnesses were never publicly questioned leaves many believing the investigation was designed to close a door, not open one. The OIG may have issued its findings, but for much of the public and many experts, the most important questions remain unanswered. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: DOJ issues scathing rebuke of Bureau of Prisons detailing multiple failures that led to Jeffrey Epstein's suicide | CNN Politics…
Welcome to Player FM!
Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.