Home to the Spectator's best podcasts on everything from politics to religion, literature to food and drink, and more. A new podcast every day from writers worth listening to.
…
continue reading
Content provided by Bobby Capucci. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Bobby Capucci or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!
Go offline with the Player FM app!
The Media Coalition Slams the Prosecution For Slow Walking Diddy Evidence (6/29/25)
MP3•Episode home
Manage episode 491545584 series 2987886
Content provided by Bobby Capucci. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Bobby Capucci or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
In a letter submitted via ECF to Judge Arun Subramanian, attorney Robert Balin, representing a coalition of major media outlets—including The Associated Press, ABC News, NBC News, The New York Times, The Washington Post, CBS News, NPR, Reuters, and others—raised concerns over the government’s failure to provide timely public access to exhibits introduced during the testimony of the pseudonymous witness known as “Jane” in United States v. Combs. The government had previously assured both the Court and the News Organizations that such access would be granted in a manner consistent with open court proceedings and First Amendment protections.
However, the letter asserts that those assurances were not honored, and the media was effectively prevented from reviewing exhibits contemporaneously with the witness’s testimony. The News Organizations argue that this delay undermines both the principles of transparency and the public’s constitutional right to observe judicial proceedings in real time. They request that the Court ensure immediate access to all future exhibits admitted into evidence, including those associated with sensitive or pseudonymous witnesses, barring any compelling and legally justified reason for delay.
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Combs Trial - Letter re Delays re Jane Doe Exhibits 4913-4050-8751 v.2
…
continue reading
However, the letter asserts that those assurances were not honored, and the media was effectively prevented from reviewing exhibits contemporaneously with the witness’s testimony. The News Organizations argue that this delay undermines both the principles of transparency and the public’s constitutional right to observe judicial proceedings in real time. They request that the Court ensure immediate access to all future exhibits admitted into evidence, including those associated with sensitive or pseudonymous witnesses, barring any compelling and legally justified reason for delay.
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Combs Trial - Letter re Delays re Jane Doe Exhibits 4913-4050-8751 v.2
1105 episodes
MP3•Episode home
Manage episode 491545584 series 2987886
Content provided by Bobby Capucci. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Bobby Capucci or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
In a letter submitted via ECF to Judge Arun Subramanian, attorney Robert Balin, representing a coalition of major media outlets—including The Associated Press, ABC News, NBC News, The New York Times, The Washington Post, CBS News, NPR, Reuters, and others—raised concerns over the government’s failure to provide timely public access to exhibits introduced during the testimony of the pseudonymous witness known as “Jane” in United States v. Combs. The government had previously assured both the Court and the News Organizations that such access would be granted in a manner consistent with open court proceedings and First Amendment protections.
However, the letter asserts that those assurances were not honored, and the media was effectively prevented from reviewing exhibits contemporaneously with the witness’s testimony. The News Organizations argue that this delay undermines both the principles of transparency and the public’s constitutional right to observe judicial proceedings in real time. They request that the Court ensure immediate access to all future exhibits admitted into evidence, including those associated with sensitive or pseudonymous witnesses, barring any compelling and legally justified reason for delay.
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Combs Trial - Letter re Delays re Jane Doe Exhibits 4913-4050-8751 v.2
…
continue reading
However, the letter asserts that those assurances were not honored, and the media was effectively prevented from reviewing exhibits contemporaneously with the witness’s testimony. The News Organizations argue that this delay undermines both the principles of transparency and the public’s constitutional right to observe judicial proceedings in real time. They request that the Court ensure immediate access to all future exhibits admitted into evidence, including those associated with sensitive or pseudonymous witnesses, barring any compelling and legally justified reason for delay.
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Combs Trial - Letter re Delays re Jane Doe Exhibits 4913-4050-8751 v.2
1105 episodes
All episodes
×Welcome to Player FM!
Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.