))
What to do about peer review?
Fetch error
Hmmm there seems to be a problem fetching this series right now.
Last successful fetch was on September 26, 2024 05:13 (
What now? This series will be checked again in the next day. If you believe it should be working, please verify the publisher's feed link below is valid and includes actual episode links. You can contact support to request the feed be immediately fetched.
Manage episode 353894363 series 3429328
Content provided by José Javier Otero, M.D., Ph.D., José Javier Otero, and M.D.. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by José Javier Otero, M.D., Ph.D., José Javier Otero, and M.D. or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
Peer review is a constant source of frustration amongst biomedical and clinical researchers. It also causes a significant quantity of unnecessary stress to junior trainees who often feel that the values of the peer review process conflict with their own values. Dr. Glaucomflecken has a hilarious video on this (https://youtu.be/ukAkG6c_N4M). In this podcast I review why we have a peer review system, what niche the journals have filled, and what compensation (or lack of) is given to peer reviewers. I suggest a few strategies to dealing with the stress of peer review.
Biocredible.ai is here to serve you and help guide you through this difficult career to bring a better work/life balance. Please send us notes to [email protected], and consider sponsoring us on Patreon. https://www.patreon.com/user?u=83507482
16 episodes
Share
