Go offline with the Player FM app!
On research identity, meaningful work and funding (solo)
Manage episode 397292265 series 3488083
Triggered by a comment from Katta Spiel in an earlier podcast, in this solo episode I explore the tensions between the autonomy and freedom we have to shape our research identities and do meaningful work, and the systemic constraints from funding and promotion opportunities. The tensions particularly arise when research interests don’t align well with institutional expectations or funding trends. I explore various ways to navigate these tensions, such as, adjusting research focus to align with strategic priorities, reframing research proposals while keeping the core agenda unchanged, or continuing passion projects outside of formal funded frameworks. I also reflect on potential trade-offs and the importance of maintaining personal connection and motivation in our research work. At the end I suggest some strategies for self-reflection and staying in tune with what 'lights you up' as a researcher.
This episode also connects with prior podcast guests Mark Reed and Stuart Reeves.
Overview:
00:29 Introduction and Reflection on Academic Freedom
01:54 Replay from Katta Spiel Part 1
02:37 Mark Reed's principle for engagement and impact
05:22 The Tension Between Personal Values, Identity and Systemic Expectations
07:05 The Reality of Funding Proposals and Strategic Game
08:40 The Impact of Funding Conditions on Research
10:27 The Dilemma of Playing the Funding Game
13:08 Choices for How to Play the Game
19:59 Choosing Not to Play the Game
21:54 Reframing Research Identity
26:55 End
Related links:
Mark Reed, What is good practice engagement and impact? Dec 5 2023
133 episodes
Manage episode 397292265 series 3488083
Triggered by a comment from Katta Spiel in an earlier podcast, in this solo episode I explore the tensions between the autonomy and freedom we have to shape our research identities and do meaningful work, and the systemic constraints from funding and promotion opportunities. The tensions particularly arise when research interests don’t align well with institutional expectations or funding trends. I explore various ways to navigate these tensions, such as, adjusting research focus to align with strategic priorities, reframing research proposals while keeping the core agenda unchanged, or continuing passion projects outside of formal funded frameworks. I also reflect on potential trade-offs and the importance of maintaining personal connection and motivation in our research work. At the end I suggest some strategies for self-reflection and staying in tune with what 'lights you up' as a researcher.
This episode also connects with prior podcast guests Mark Reed and Stuart Reeves.
Overview:
00:29 Introduction and Reflection on Academic Freedom
01:54 Replay from Katta Spiel Part 1
02:37 Mark Reed's principle for engagement and impact
05:22 The Tension Between Personal Values, Identity and Systemic Expectations
07:05 The Reality of Funding Proposals and Strategic Game
08:40 The Impact of Funding Conditions on Research
10:27 The Dilemma of Playing the Funding Game
13:08 Choices for How to Play the Game
19:59 Choosing Not to Play the Game
21:54 Reframing Research Identity
26:55 End
Related links:
Mark Reed, What is good practice engagement and impact? Dec 5 2023
133 episodes
All episodes
×Welcome to Player FM!
Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.