New Models for Consolidation in Higher Education

Changing Higher Ed

Connect with Michael Horowitz on LinkedIn →

28:54

3 OnlyFans horror stories that went horribly wrong and reveal the terrifying reality behind the screen. In this video, we dive into the dark side of the internet’s most talked-about platform. These are true stories shared by real creators whose experiences with OnlyFans turned into absolute nightmares. From obsessive fans and dangerous stalkers to privacy violations and threats, these horror stories are a warning about the hidden dangers of digital fame. Whether you're a content creator or a curious viewer, this chilling look at the darker side of OnlyFans will open your eyes. Viewer discretion is advised. #OnlyFansHorrorStories #TrueScaryStories #InternetHorror #CreepyOnlyFansTales #OnlineSafety #DigitalFameGoneWrong #HorrorStoryTime #RealLifeHorror #OnlyFansDarkSide #OnlineCreeps OnlyFans horror stories, true OnlyFans scary stories, OnlyFans gone wrong, OnlyFans stalker story, internet fame horror, real life OnlyFans stories, disturbing OnlyFans experiences, true online horror stories, digital creator nightmare, online fan obsession, scary OnlyFans moments, influencer horror stories, creepy internet stories, social media danger, OnlyFans privacy issues, dark side of OnlyFans, creepy OnlyFans subscribers, online fame consequences, true internet creeps, real online stalker stories, scary digital fame, internet fame gone wrong, OnlyFans revenge stories, horror storytime online, influencer safety warning, OnlyFans terrifying tales, shocking online experiences, real digital horror, OnlyFans experiences gone wrong, true stories about OnlyFans, YouTube horror content, creator horror experiences, scary social media stories, OnlyFans true stories, fame gone wrong Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices…

about a year ago 34:42

MP3•Episode home

Consolidating Higher Education: The Community Solution Model

This episode of the Changing Higher Ed® podcast features Dr. Michael Horowitz, Chancellor of The Community Solution Education System (formerly TCS Education System), who discusses using innovative models for higher education consolidation as an additional category in or alternative to traditional mergers or acquisitions. Horowitz highlights the system's unique approach, a collaborative model prioritizing resource optimization and expertise sharing among member institutions while maintaining individual identities.

The conversation addresses challenges facing higher education, including increasing closure rates and the importance of proactive strategies like mergers, acquisitions, and consolidations. Both McNaughton and Horowitz emphasize the necessity of early planning and shared vision, particularly involving faculty, for successful integration.

They also touch on broader trends and challenges in higher education, such as increasing closures and the challenges boards face in adapting to the uniqueness of the business of higher education.

They conclude with practical advice for institutions considering consolidation, focusing on partnership development, early financial assessment, and resource amplification to strengthen academic missions.

Key Discussion Points

The Community Solution Model: A Collaborative System

Alternative to Traditional M&A: The Community Solution operates as a "system" where institutions collaborate rather than compete. This approach aims to optimize resources, share expertise, and improve student success.

Quote: "The consolidation that operates as a system in which its institutions collaborate instead of competing, gain resources, share expertise, and optimize expenditures in the process." – Michael Horowitz

System Integration: The system model integrates non-student facing operations like finance, technology, and marketing. This allows individual institutions to focus on academic endeavors.

Quote: "All of that can be scaled. To better quality, for the same dollar... The uniqueness has to drive through the academics."– Michael Horowitz

Maintaining Institutional Identity: Each college within the system retains its own accreditation, president, board, leadership, assets, and liabilities. The system consolidates operations, not the institutions themselves.

Quote: "…each of our colleges keeps its own accreditation, president, board, leadership, their own assets and liabilities." – Michael Horowitz

Trends in Higher Education and the Need for Consolidation

Increasing Closures: The concerning trend of college closures, which have a significant negative impact on students and communities. Clayton Christensen's prediction of closures is revisited and said to be possibly understated.

Quote: " The closure rate is accelerating. Last year there were 80 closures total, including 16 nonprofits." – Drumm McNaughton

Mature and Declining Market: The higher education market is described as mature with overcapacity and declining student populations. The need for a new strategy to remain viable is clear.
Boards Waiting Too Long: Many college boards are hesitant to act proactively and address financial or enrollment trends until it is too late. Relying on 'hope' is not an effective strategy.
AI Prediction: AI models could accurately predict most college closures based on historical data, showing that many of these closures are foreseeable.

The Benefits of a System Approach

Resource Amplification: Consolidation of back-end services leads to cost savings that can be reinvested into academic programs. The system aims to "amplify" resources, not just save money.
Scalability and Efficiency: Shared resources and centralized functions create economies of scale and improve overall efficiency.
Shared Talent and Ideas: The system fosters collaboration and the sharing of best practices among institutions and staff, resulting in shared knowledge.

Quote: "...we're amplifying our brain power by coming together." – Michael Horowitz

Enhanced Faculty and Student Resources: The system provides faculty with resources like teaching and learning support and global engagement programs.

Implementation and Integration Challenges

Regulatory Process: Post-merger integration involves navigating a complex regulatory process that requires meticulous planning and execution and can take an extended amount of time.
Project Management: Successful integration requires strong project management skills to coordinate the various tasks and stages.

“The most valuable person that you have on your post-merger integration team is your project manager." – Dr. Drumm McNaughton.

Faculty Buy-In: Obtaining faculty support and ensuring clear communication are crucial for a successful transition.
Timeline: The process from initial discussion to full integration can be lengthy and can take up to three years.

Consolidation Governance Structure

Dual Board Structure: Each college retains its own board, which is deeply involved with the day-to-day operations, while a system board oversees the overall system mission, risk, and financial health.
System Board Role: The system board provides guidance and support but does not interfere with the day-to-day operations of the colleges. This board looks at how the system works together.
Shared Governance: Overlap between the two board structures allows for a shared understanding of institutional goals and needs.

Future Plans at The Community Solution (TCS)

New Facility in Chicago: The Community Solution is consolidating its system office and Chicago school into a new facility to increase collaboration and efficiency. This includes plans for a second medical school.
Canadian Recruitment: The system is planning to establish a presence in Vancouver, Canada, to recruit more international students without needing to create duplicative offices.
Global Perspective: The system sees the importance of global education and perspective in higher ed.

Three Takeaways for Institution Presidents and Boards Considering Consolidation

Seek Partnerships: Proactively explore potential collaborations with other colleges, universities, or community entities.
Act Early & Study Financials: Have these conversations early, don't wait until urgency arises, and be very aware of financial and enrollment trends.
Amplify Resources: Focus on amplifying resources through collaboration to strengthen both the academic mission and community impact.

Wrapping Up

This podcast provides valuable insights into an alternative model for higher education consolidation that prioritizes collaboration, resource optimization, and the preservation of institutional identity. The Community Solution's approach serves as an example for other institutions facing challenges in a changing higher education landscape. The conversation highlights the necessity of proactive decision-making and strategic planning.

Read the transcript on our website at https://changinghighered.com/new-models-for-consolidation-in-higher-education/

#HigherEducation #HigherEducationConsolidation #HigherEducationPodcast

About Our Podcast Guest

Michael Horowitz, Ph.D., is the founder and president of The Community Solution Education System, an integrated, nonprofit system of six colleges and universities that work collaboratively to increase student success and enhance community impact. Prior to founding The Community Solution, he served as president of The Chicago School for nearly a decade. Dr. Horowitz has more than 30 years of experience in higher education roles that include faculty member, program director, and dean. He holds a Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology from Northwestern University and a B.A. in Psychology from Columbia University.

About the Host

Dr. Drumm McNaughton is the founder, CEO, and Principal Consultant at The Change Leader, Inc. A highly sought-after higher education consultant with 20+ years of experience, Dr. McNaughton works with leadership, management, and boards of both U.S. and international institutions. His expertise spans key areas, including accreditation, governance, strategic planning, presidential onboarding, mergers, acquisitions, and strategic alliances. Dr. McNaughton’s approach combines a holistic methodology with a deep understanding of the contemporary and evolving challenges facing higher education institutions worldwide to ensure his clients succeed in their mission.

272 episodes

#Accreditation #College #MBA #Business #Dr. Drumm McNaughton #Board #Planning #Provost #Transformation #Podcasting Education #Government #Universe

Changing Higher Ed

New Models for Consolidation in Higher Education

Changing Higher Ed

published about a year ago

MP3•Episode home

Consolidating Higher Education: The Community Solution Model

They also touch on broader trends and challenges in higher education, such as increasing closures and the challenges boards face in adapting to the uniqueness of the business of higher education.

Key Discussion Points

The Community Solution Model: A Collaborative System

Alternative to Traditional M&A: The Community Solution operates as a "system" where institutions collaborate rather than compete. This approach aims to optimize resources, share expertise, and improve student success.

System Integration: The system model integrates non-student facing operations like finance, technology, and marketing. This allows individual institutions to focus on academic endeavors.

Quote: "All of that can be scaled. To better quality, for the same dollar... The uniqueness has to drive through the academics."– Michael Horowitz

Maintaining Institutional Identity: Each college within the system retains its own accreditation, president, board, leadership, assets, and liabilities. The system consolidates operations, not the institutions themselves.

Quote: "…each of our colleges keeps its own accreditation, president, board, leadership, their own assets and liabilities." – Michael Horowitz

Trends in Higher Education and the Need for Consolidation

Increasing Closures: The concerning trend of college closures, which have a significant negative impact on students and communities. Clayton Christensen's prediction of closures is revisited and said to be possibly understated.

Quote: " The closure rate is accelerating. Last year there were 80 closures total, including 16 nonprofits." – Drumm McNaughton

Mature and Declining Market: The higher education market is described as mature with overcapacity and declining student populations. The need for a new strategy to remain viable is clear.
Boards Waiting Too Long: Many college boards are hesitant to act proactively and address financial or enrollment trends until it is too late. Relying on 'hope' is not an effective strategy.
AI Prediction: AI models could accurately predict most college closures based on historical data, showing that many of these closures are foreseeable.

The Benefits of a System Approach

Resource Amplification: Consolidation of back-end services leads to cost savings that can be reinvested into academic programs. The system aims to "amplify" resources, not just save money.
Scalability and Efficiency: Shared resources and centralized functions create economies of scale and improve overall efficiency.
Shared Talent and Ideas: The system fosters collaboration and the sharing of best practices among institutions and staff, resulting in shared knowledge.

Quote: "...we're amplifying our brain power by coming together." – Michael Horowitz

Enhanced Faculty and Student Resources: The system provides faculty with resources like teaching and learning support and global engagement programs.

Implementation and Integration Challenges

Regulatory Process: Post-merger integration involves navigating a complex regulatory process that requires meticulous planning and execution and can take an extended amount of time.
Project Management: Successful integration requires strong project management skills to coordinate the various tasks and stages.

“The most valuable person that you have on your post-merger integration team is your project manager." – Dr. Drumm McNaughton.

Faculty Buy-In: Obtaining faculty support and ensuring clear communication are crucial for a successful transition.
Timeline: The process from initial discussion to full integration can be lengthy and can take up to three years.

Consolidation Governance Structure

Dual Board Structure: Each college retains its own board, which is deeply involved with the day-to-day operations, while a system board oversees the overall system mission, risk, and financial health.
System Board Role: The system board provides guidance and support but does not interfere with the day-to-day operations of the colleges. This board looks at how the system works together.
Shared Governance: Overlap between the two board structures allows for a shared understanding of institutional goals and needs.

Future Plans at The Community Solution (TCS)

New Facility in Chicago: The Community Solution is consolidating its system office and Chicago school into a new facility to increase collaboration and efficiency. This includes plans for a second medical school.
Canadian Recruitment: The system is planning to establish a presence in Vancouver, Canada, to recruit more international students without needing to create duplicative offices.
Global Perspective: The system sees the importance of global education and perspective in higher ed.

Three Takeaways for Institution Presidents and Boards Considering Consolidation

Seek Partnerships: Proactively explore potential collaborations with other colleges, universities, or community entities.
Act Early & Study Financials: Have these conversations early, don't wait until urgency arises, and be very aware of financial and enrollment trends.
Amplify Resources: Focus on amplifying resources through collaboration to strengthen both the academic mission and community impact.

Wrapping Up

Read the transcript on our website at https://changinghighered.com/new-models-for-consolidation-in-higher-education/

#HigherEducation #HigherEducationConsolidation #HigherEducationPodcast

About Our Podcast Guest

Connect with Michael Horowitz on LinkedIn →

About the Host

272 episodes

#Accreditation #College #MBA #Business #Dr. Drumm McNaughton #Board #Planning #Provost #Transformation #Podcasting Education #Government #Universe

All episodes

Changing Higher Ed

1
Caltech’s Approach to Stronger Private Board Governance 35:14

3 days ago35:14

35:14

Caltech’s board once had nearly 80 members; too many for focused discussion or quick decisions. In this episode of the Changing Higher Ed® podcast, Dr. Drumm McNaughton talks with Cathy Light, Caltech’s Secretary of the Board , about how the institution streamlined governance , strengthened committees, and made trustee reorientation mandatory. Light, who has held senior roles at Carnegie Mellon University and the Semester at Sea program, outlines how Caltech conducts trustee assessments, structures its executive committee, and uses an ongoing governance review to keep the board working at its best. Topics Covered: Governance changes prompted by the pandemic Defining trustee responsibilities in 2025 Using the executive committee for responsive decision-making The role of the governance and nominating committee Trustee assessments and renewal decisions Making orientation and reorientation standard practice Maintaining strategic oversight without micromanaging Involving alumni and students without adding voting seats Real-World Examples: Reducing the board from 80 members to a manageable size Giving young alumni trustees full voting rights Using retreats and campus visits to connect trustees with faculty research Three Takeaways for Leadership: Keep governance review continuous and adaptive. Use orientation and reorientation to maintain alignment. Structure boards for informed, timely decisions without overstepping into operations. For presidents, trustees, board chairs, board secretaries, and governance committees aiming to improve board effectiveness. Read the transcript: https://changinghighered.com/caltech-private-higher-education-board-governance-model/ #HigherEdGovernance #BoardGovernance #HigherEducationPodcast #HigherEdGovernanceModel…

Changing Higher Ed

1
How University Leaders Can Transform Institutions with Program Realignment and Scalable Mental Health Services 38:26

10 days ago38:26

38:26

40% of California’s licensed doctoral psychologists come from one university that nearly failed a decade ago. Their turnaround didn’t come from diversifying programs or chasing enrollment—it came from making the hardest decision in higher ed: cutting what wasn’t excellent. In this episode of the Changing Higher Ed® podcast , Dr. Drumm McNaughton speaks with Andy Vaughn , President and CEO of Alliant International University, about how institutional leaders can drive university transformation by making tough calls, realigning programs, and embedding scalable mental health support into their core operations. Drawing from Alliant’s strategic shift, Vaughn explains why program focus and transparent leadership are more effective than traditional diversification models. He shares how embedding mental health services into academic programs created both a market advantage and a support system for students, faculty, and staff. Topics Covered: Why eliminating underperforming programs can drive institutional transformation How program realignment strengthens financial stability and market positioning Embedding scalable mental health services into academic programs and operations The leadership imperative: transparency, inclusion, and decisive action Codifying organizational values to guide behavior and decision-making Managing faculty-administration relations with professionalism and respect Preparing for unprecedented policy and legislative changes impacting higher ed Real-World Examples Discussed: Alliant International University’s strategic focus on licensure-driven programs The integration of Alliant Clinics, providing community mental health services Leadership communication practices to maintain trust during operational changes Partnering with psychology schools for scalable mental health service delivery Three Key Takeaways for Leadership: Codify and normalize institutional values so that decision-making and behaviors align across all levels. Be transparent with stakeholders about challenges and solutions, fostering trust and shared ownership of outcomes. Involve the entire institution—including part-time staff—in transformation efforts to ensure unified execution during critical periods. This episode offers a practical framework for institutional leaders navigating transformation, operational challenges, and the rising demand for campus-wide mental health support. Recommended For: Presidents, trustees, provosts, CFOs, student affairs leaders, and higher education executives focused on institutional sustainability and student success. Read the transcript: https://changinghighered.com/university-transformation-program-focus-scalable-mental-health/ #UniversityTransformation #HigherEdLeadership #MentalHealthSupport #ProgramRealignment #HigherEducationPodcast…

Changing Higher Ed

1
Helping First-Gen and Low SES Students Succeed: A Regional Model That Works 38:20

17 days ago38:20

38:20

With first-generation and low SES students facing steep barriers to completion and career entry, Great Jobs KC has built a replicable model that starts in high school, continues through college, and delivers real workforce outcomes. In this episode of the Changing Higher Ed® podcast , Dr. Drumm McNaughton speaks with Great Jobs KC CEO Earl Martin Phalen about how regional collaboration, wraparound services, and employer partnerships are helping underserved students succeed beyond graduation. Phalen outlines how Great Jobs KC collaborates with 24 higher education institutions, over 150 employer partners, and K–12 feeder systems to support students from high school through college graduation and into strong first jobs. Through initiatives like KC Scholars and the Great Jobs KC scholarship, the organization provides $50,000 per student for tuition, transportation, and wraparound support—including case managers, success coaches, and career placement services. This episode offers practical, data-backed insights for institutional leaders working to improve retention, increase degree completion, and strengthen job placement results for underserved students through strategic regional partnerships. Topics Covered: The unique needs of first-generation and low SES students Designing holistic support systems that extend beyond financial aid How to build college-employer partnerships that deliver job outcomes Regional collaboration between 24 colleges and over 150 employers The role of scholar advocates and success coaches in student persistence How investing $50,000 per student can produce high ROI Measuring impact: retention, completion, and employment rates Real-World Examples Discussed: Great Jobs KC’s partnership with regional colleges, including UMKC, Avila, William Jewell, and Donnelly College How the KC Scholars program helps high school students complete FAFSA, ACT prep, and college planning Employer partnership models, including apprenticeships, internships, and work-based learning The importance of wraparound services like transportation and mental health support in student success Scholar experiences navigating college with the help of long-term coaching Three Key Takeaways for Higher Ed Leadership: Institutions that want to serve first-gen and low-income students need more than scholarships—they need scalable systems of support. Long-term coaching and employer-aligned programs can dramatically improve retention, completion, and career outcomes. Regional collaboration between colleges, K–12 schools, and employers isn’t just ideal—it’s necessary to build equitable education-to-career pipelines. Recommended For: Presidents, provosts, trustees, enrollment and student success leaders, and system executives seeking replicable strategies to improve access, retention, completion, and career outcomes for first-generation and low SES students. Read the transcript on our website: https://changinghighered.com/first-gen-and-low-ses-student-success-strategies/ #HigherEdLeadership #StudentSuccess #FirstGenStudents #LowSESStudentSuccess #RegionalCollaboration #HigherEducationPodcast…

Changing Higher Ed

1
Washington Update: July 2025 Reconciliation Bill’s Impact on Higher Ed 38:48

24 days ago38:48

38:48

Higher education leaders are facing the most sweeping set of federal regulatory and funding changes in over a decade. In this Washington Update episode of the Changing Higher Ed® podcast , Dr. Drumm McNaughton welcomes back frequent guest Tom Netting, president of TEN Government Strategies, to discuss the July 2025 budget reconciliation bill—federal legislation that significantly alters student loans, Pell Grants, institutional accountability, and the rules governing program eligibility. While not a formal reauthorization of the Higher Education Act, the bill introduces statutory earnings-based accountability for degree programs, lifetime loan caps, professional judgment changes, and new eligibility requirements for short-term Pell programs. Netting also discusses concurrent developments in accreditation and distance education oversight, including the rise of a new accreditor in Florida and its potential implications for NC-SARA and federal triad stability. This episode is a must-listen for presidents, trustees, CFOs, and compliance officers preparing for upcoming reporting deadlines, new negotiated rulemaking cycles, and long-term institutional planning under new federal constraints. Topics Covered How the July 2025 reconciliation bill rewrites federal student aid and accountability rules What the new earnings-based accountability measure means for degree programs Pell Grant expansion for short-term workforce programs and the required outcomes thresholds The elimination of Grad PLUS loans and new lifetime borrowing caps for students and families Changes to professional judgment authority and how institutions can apply it by cohort New 90/10 revenue guidance and how it affects distance education classifications Delayed implementation of Borrower Defense and Closed School Discharge regulations The emergence of Florida’s state-based accreditor and its expected NACIQI review Why NC-SARA recognition may be impacted by nontraditional accreditation The likelihood of a second reconciliation bill or technical corrections package Three Key Takeaways for Leadership Institutional leaders must prepare now for dual accountability frameworks and new reporting obligations. Expanded professional judgment offers new flexibility but must be applied with consistency and clear documentation. Accreditation and state authorization pathways are shifting—compliance teams must monitor evolving standards across federal and state lines. This episode provides critical insights for leaders navigating a changing regulatory environment, with practical implications for finance, compliance, and academic planning. Recommended For: Presidents, trustees, chief financial officers, compliance officers, and accreditation liaisons responsible for institutional strategy and Title IV eligibility. Read the transcript: https://changinghighered.com/washington-update-july-2025-reconciliation-bill-impact-on-higher-ed/ #HigherEdPolicy #July2025ReconciliationBill #FinancialAidCompliance #FederalLegislation #HigherEducationPodcast…

Changing Higher Ed

1
Building a Connected College by Aligning Strategy and Services 37:26

4 weeks ago37:26

37:26

Most colleges rely on more than 20 disconnected systems to support students, creating confusion, reducing engagement, and lowering graduation rates. In this episode of the Changing Higher Ed® podcast, Dr. Drumm McNaughton speaks with Elliot Felix is the founder of brightspot Strategy (acquired by Buro Happold in 2020) and the author of The Connected College: Leadership Strategies for Student Success about how building integrated systems where strategy, services, and technology work together can improve student outcomes without increasing institutional complexity or cost. Felix, who has worked with more than 100 institutions including MIT, NYU, and the University of Virginia, draws on his background in architecture and design thinking to offer practical solutions for breaking down silos and creating seamless student experiences. This conversation provides actionable strategies for institutional leaders seeking to move from fragmentation to alignment while managing limited resources. This episode is particularly valuable for presidents, trustees, and senior administrators looking to redesign operations and improve student success through systemic coordination rather than adding more programs and services. Topics Covered: Why the "additive culture" in higher education creates operational sprawl and student confusion How design thinking can transform institutional strategy and student experience Practical approaches to breaking down silos without major reorganizations Using RACI models and governance structures to enable faster, smarter decisions The critical importance of aligning strategic planning with budget decisions Reframing risk as a condition for progress through prototyping and piloting Strategic partnerships as tools for expanding capacity without internal complexity Real-World Examples Discussed: NYU's transformation of computer labs into "connect and create" collaborative spaces UVA's co-location of different advising functions for seamless student support Purdue University's Communicators Council as a model for decentralized coordination Colorado State's IT governance process for strategic technology investments The pitfall of institutions with both writing centers and writing labs in the same building Quinnipiac's healthcare partnership providing both services and talent pipeline Amarillo College's community partnerships that increased graduation rates from 14% to 65-80% Three Key Takeaways for Leadership: Create a focused strategy that prioritizes where to invest, makes hard tradeoffs, and aligns budget with institutional goals Break the cycle of fragmentation by consolidating services and systems to improve access, reduce duplication, and enhance outcomes Reframe risk as progress by encouraging piloting and iteration to unlock innovation without waiting for consensus or perfection This episode offers institutional leaders a clear, actionable framework for moving from fragmentation to alignment while improving student outcomes through strategic execution rather than adding complexity. Recommended For: Presidents, trustees, chief academic officers, student affairs leaders, and institutional planning teams focused on improving student success through systemic coordination. Read the transcript: https://changinghighered.com/connected-college-strategy-to-improve-student-success/ #HigherEdLeadership #StudentSuccess #InstitutionalStrategy #HigherEducationPodcast…

Changing Higher Ed

1
Using AI to Fix Admissions and Enrollment Without Losing the Human Touch 38:22

5 weeks ago38:22

38:22

AI can change how colleges and universities approach enrollment, making it faster, fairer, and more aligned with student success. In this episode of Changing Higher Ed® podcast , Dr. Drumm McNaughton talks with Ashish Fernando, founder and CEO of EDMO and iSchoolConnect , about how institutions can use artificial intelligence to improve admissions, automate routine tasks, and personalize support without losing the human touch. Drawing on real-world implementations at Western Governors University, Franklin University, and others, Fernando outlines how AI enables institutions to make faster admissions decisions, better assess student fit, and improve long-term outcomes. He also explains where human judgment still matters and why redesigning broken enrollment processes is critical before adding automation. This episode offers practical insights for presidents, provosts, enrollment leaders, and trustees seeking to modernize recruitment, increase yield, and align institutional capacity with student expectations. Topics Covered Why enrollment strategy must prioritize student fit, not just volume How AI improves speed to decision and impacts yield What admissions tasks are appropriate for automation The strategic value of chatbots and real-time decision systems How to avoid automating broken or biased processes Balancing technology with human counseling in admissions Real-world examples of AI implementation in higher education Real-World Examples Discussed Western Governors University’s scalable, self-paced enrollment model Franklin University’s five-minute transfer evaluation and admissions decision NYU’s BobChat and chatbot-supported student services National University’s approach to AI infrastructure Three Key Takeaways Think from the outside in. Understand student motivations and design enrollment to reflect their needs and expectations. Use speed as strategy. Institutions that respond quickly improve yield, reduce melt, and gain a competitive edge. Embed AI in operations. Treat AI as infrastructure built to support staff, not replace them. Read the transcript: https://changinghighered.com/how-to-use-ai-to-improve-enrollment-and-admissions/ #HigherEdEnrollment #AIinHigherEd #AdmissionsStrategy #HigherEducationPodcast #InstitutionalEffectiveness…

Changing Higher Ed

1
How Utah State Is Using a Connected Campus to Boost Student Engagement and Persistence 36:45

6 weeks ago36:45

36:45

Digital transformation in higher education often focuses on technology. But for Utah State University, the transformation has been about outcomes: improving retention, strengthening equity, and building scalable systems of support without overhauling infrastructure. In this episode of the Changing Higher Ed® podcast , Dr. Drumm McNaughton speaks with Rene Eborn, Associate Vice President of Strategic Initiatives and Deputy of Digital Transformation at Utah State University , about how the institution designed and implemented a connected campus strategy that integrates advising, communications, and academic support into a single mobile-first platform. Drawing on her decades of experience in higher ed and edtech leadership, Eborn shares how USU replaced nine siloed tools with five integrated platforms, enabling early alerts, AI-powered nudges, and real-time visibility across departments. She explains how this model supports faculty, staff, and especially underserved student populations—including first-generation, commuter, and online learners—by surfacing what students need, when they need it. This conversation is especially relevant for institutional leaders looking to align digital infrastructure with student success goals, without ballooning their tech stack or losing sight of their mission. Topics Covered: Why USU’s connected campus approach focuses on student equity and support How the university integrated CRM, LMS, advising, and communications systems The role of AI nudges and early alerts in preventing student disengagement How faculty and staff use the system to support students in real time What the rollout process looked like—and why stakeholder involvement was key What’s next: building toward a full 360-degree student lifecycle view Real-World Examples Discussed: A first-generation student juggling three jobs flagged by the early alert system and connected to scholarship resources in time Student dashboards that surface personalized academic, advising, and financial steps A platform expansion that now includes parents, alumni, and prospective students High adoption rates driven by student feedback and design input Three Key Takeaways for Leadership: Technology should be integrated, not layered—start with user needs and existing infrastructure. Faculty and staff buy-in depends on systems that make their work easier, not more complicated. Student success improves when support is timely, personalized, and accessible—especially for those who need it most. This episode offers a practical look at what’s possible when digital transformation is driven by strategy, not software—and why connected campuses may be one of the most effective ways to support today’s diverse student population. Recommended For: Presidents, provosts, CIOs, trustees, enrollment managers, and student success leaders building or scaling student-centered infrastructure. Read the transcript: https://changinghighered.com/creating-a-connected-campus-strategy-for-student-success/ #ConnectedCampus #StudentSuccess #HigherEdTechnology #HigherEducationPodcast #DigitalTransformation…

Changing Higher Ed

1
Strategies to Help Adult Learners Re-Enroll and Graduate 37:53

7 weeks ago37:53

37:53

How Cross-Sector Partnerships Help Adult Learners Return, Persist, and Complete Degrees With over 41 million adults in the U.S. holding some college credit but no degree, colleges and universities are under pressure to implement effective adult learner enrollment strategies. In this episode of the Changing Higher Ed podcast , Dr. Drumm McNaughton speaks with Malik Brown, President and CEO of Graduate Philadelphia, about how institutions can re-engage students who have stopped out through cross-sector partnerships that support enrollment, retention, and degree completion. Drawing on their real-world experience in higher education and workforce development, McNaughton and Brown discuss how adult learners face unique barriers—including affordability, caregiving responsibilities, and outdated enrollment systems—and how intermediaries like nonprofits and employers can play a crucial role in supporting their return to college. The episode outlines practical, replicable strategies that institutional leaders can adopt to build sustainable pipelines for adult learner success. This conversation is especially valuable for higher ed presidents, provosts, and enrollment leaders tasked with addressing demographic shifts and declining enrollments while aligning with workforce and community needs. Topics Covered: The economic and social reasons over 41 million Americans have stopped out Why adult learners need support from application through graduation How partnerships with nonprofits, employers, and funders extend institutional capacity The importance of stackable credentials aligned to labor market needs Why re-enrollment strategies must include systems changes and credit articulation Reducing friction in the application, financial aid, and credit transfer processes Real-World Examples Discussed: Graduate Philadelphia’s intermediary role connecting students, colleges, and employers How employers can provide scheduling flexibility and tuition assistance Use of workforce credentials as an on-ramp to degrees Models for credit articulation and co-governed partnerships Community-based navigation support that increases persistence and completion Three Key Takeaways for Leadership: Build integrated partnerships that extend institutional reach. Nonprofits, workforce boards, and employers provide essential wraparound services that help adult learners succeed. Design stackable pathways that start with workforce credentials. These programs allow adults to earn income and confidence while progressing toward a degree. Fix enrollment systems that weren’t built for adults. From transcript access to unpaid balances, institutions must streamline re-entry to remove avoidable barriers. This episode provides a framework for institutional leaders seeking actionable strategies to re-enroll adult learners and support them through to graduation. Recommended For: Presidents, provosts, chief enrollment officers, board members, continuing education leaders, and workforce development professionals focused on adult learners and institutional sustainability. Read the transcript: https://changinghighered.com/adult-learner-enrollment-completion-partnerships/ #AdultLearners #HigherEdEnrollment #WorkforcePartnerships #HigherEducationPodcast #DegreeCompletion #ChangingHigherEd…

Changing Higher Ed

1
High Structure Course Design for Student Engagement, Retention, and Success 40:38

8 weeks ago40:38

40:38

Higher education leaders are searching for better ways to engage students, improve retention, and close equity gaps—especially in the wake of COVID-related learning disruptions. In this episode of the Changing Higher Ed® podcast, Dr. Drumm McNaughton speaks with Dr. Justin Shaffer , Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies and Teaching Professor in Chemical and Biological Engineering at the Colorado School of Mines. They discuss Dr. Shaffer’s book, High Structure Course Design , which offers a proven framework for transforming student outcomes. High structure course design—built on clarity, repetition, feedback, and engagement—originated in STEM education but is now widely recognized as effective across disciplines. This approach doesn't water down rigor; it scaffolds the learning process so students at all levels can succeed. The result: better retention, higher achievement, and greater equity in academic outcomes. This conversation is especially relevant for institutional leaders seeking to scale evidence-based instructional practices and boost institutional performance. Topics Covered: Why many students struggle in gateway courses and what faculty can do differently The long-term effects of post-COVID learning disruptions on student readiness Three structural layers that drive student engagement and retention Four foundational principles that support learning across all disciplines How high structure pedagogy closes equity gaps without lowering standards The undervalued impact of teaching-focused faculty on student success Infrastructure and leadership decisions that enable faculty innovation How structured courses also improve career readiness and workforce outcomes Real-World Examples: 40–60% failure rates improved through course redesign A biology field course that teaches both science and professional skills Centers for teaching and learning that support faculty-wide improvements Three Takeaways for Leadership: Course design is one of the most powerful and underused levers for retention and equity. Teaching-focused faculty are essential institutional assets and must be supported. Scalable infrastructure for instructional quality is not optional—it’s a strategic necessity. Recommended For: Presidents, provosts, academic leaders, board members, and faculty development directors who want scalable ways to boost student success and institutional outcomes. Read the transcript: https://changinghighered.com/high-structure-course-design-for-student-engagement-retention-and-success/ #HigherEdLeadership #RetentionStrategies #StudentSuccess…

Changing Higher Ed

1
Shared Services and Consolidation Strategies for Small Colleges 33:26

9 weeks ago33:26

33:26

Shared services and consolidation strategies are helping struggling small colleges stabilize operations, reduce costs, and pursue sustainable growth—without compromising institutional identity or student outcomes. In this episode of the Changing Higher Ed® podcast , host Dr. Drumm McNaughton speaks with Jason Duggan, CEO of Thesis Elements , about how these approaches are being used to help small colleges strengthen efficiency and financial sustainability. Drawing on his experience helping small colleges modernize their operations through cloud-based student information systems, Duggan explores how shared services, academic partnerships, and digital transformation are enabling institutions to manage costs and expand capacity. He also offers insights into how leadership teams and boards are approaching these strategies in the current financial and demographic environment. This conversation is especially relevant for presidents, trustees, and senior leadership teams evaluating whether shared services or consolidation strategies could support their institution’s long-term mission and sustainability. Topics Covered: The financial and operational pressures driving small colleges to explore shared services and consolidation How administrative shared services are helping reduce overhead and improve service quality Strategic approaches to institutional consolidation and how they can support enrollment and operational goals Academic resource-sharing models and their role in expanding offerings while managing instructional costs Innovative financial and academic strategies to strengthen institutional resilience The role of cloud-based systems and digital transformation in supporting shared services and operational agility How presidents and boards are facilitating leadership conversations about shared services and consolidation Key considerations for aligning shared services and consolidation initiatives with institutional mission and values Three Key Takeaways for Leadership: Clarify institutional mission and target audience to guide strategic planning and resource allocation. Prioritize student success and retention as core drivers of institutional resilience. Evaluate shared services and consolidation strategies as potential options for improving efficiency and long-term sustainability. This episode offers valuable insights for institutional leaders exploring new operational models to support their mission and navigate today’s higher education landscape. Recommended For: Presidents, trustees, board members, chief financial officers, provosts, and senior administrative leaders focused on institutional sustainability and operational strategy. Read the transcript: https://changinghighered.com/shared-services-and-consolidation-strategies-for-small-colleges/ #HigherEdLeadership #SharedServices #ConsolidationStrategies #HigherEducationPodcast…

Changing Higher Ed

1
Adding Leadership Development to Academic Curriculum Design in Higher Ed 28:24

10 weeks ago28:24

28:24

While higher education leaders often cite leadership development as a priority, few institutions treat it as a teachable, measurable skill. In this episode of Changing Higher Ed® , host Dr. Drumm McNaughton speaks with Dr. Scott Cowen about why leadership education should be integrated into the academic curriculum—and how institutions can implement it effectively. President Emeritus of Tulane University, Cowen shares insights from leading the university through Hurricane Katrina and from his new book, Lead and Succeed , which outlines strategies to develop leadership skills in students and early-career professionals. He dispels the “born leader” myth and offers a framework for embedding leadership development at every level of the institution. This conversation is especially relevant for presidents, trustees, and academic leaders seeking to build leadership capacity across campus. Topics Covered: Why higher education often fails to treat leadership as a strategic priority How to embed leadership development into the academic curriculum Emotional intelligence and the behavioral traits of effective leaders Leadership lessons from Tulane’s post-Katrina recovery Creating institutional systems that reinforce leadership behaviors The role of succession planning in long-term institutional health Real-World Examples Discussed: Tulane University’s relocation to Houston and Cowen’s daily crisis communication strategy The development of a for-credit leadership course and workbook, Lead and Succeed Mentorship from Dr. Norman Francis, president of Xavier University for 50 years Cowen’s “thinking out loud” email updates during crises at Tulane and Case Western Scaling structured leadership practices across institutions Three Key Takeaways for Leadership: Formalize leadership education. Establish structured academic courses with measurable outcomes. Integrate mentoring and reflection into the curriculum to build leadership competencies. Develop repeatable crisis leadership practices. Use structured daily meetings and transparent communications to align institutional response during disruption. Implement strategic succession planning. Treat leadership transitions as long-term planning initiatives. Build internal pipelines and normalize leadership exits to support institutional continuity. This episode offers a practical framework for establishing a leadership-ready culture in higher education academic curricula. Recommended For: Presidents, provosts, deans, academic affairs leaders, trustees, and student success strategists. Read the transcript: https://changinghighered.com/leadership-development-academic-curriculum-design-in-higher-ed/ #HigherEdLeadership #AcademicCurriculum #StudentDevelopment #LeadershipEducation #HigherEducationPodcast…

Changing Higher Ed

1
When DEI Is Off the Table: How Higher Ed Leaders Can Still Drive Institutional Change 45:14

11 weeks ago45:14

45:14

Higher education’s approach to DEI is under fire—from political pressure, public skepticism, and internal fatigue. But abandoning DEI isn’t the only option. In this episode of Changing Higher Ed® , Dr. Drumm McNaughton speaks with Columbia Law professor Susan Sturm about how higher ed institutions can continue to drive inclusive institutional change—without relying on traditional DEI frameworks that may no longer be viable. Sturm, author of What Might Be: Confronting Racism to Transform Our Institutions , reframes DEI as a long-term, systems-level strategy rooted in leadership, trust, and organizational learning. She introduces the concept of “full participation,” where individuals from all backgrounds can thrive and contribute to the institution’s mission—and outlines the leadership mindsets and practices necessary to build that reality. Through examples from UMBC, Columbia, and court systems, Sturm shows how change begins with local experimentation, paradox navigation, and support for “organizational catalysts” who bridge across roles and perspectives. She also explores how discomfort, conflict, and even failure can become engines for cultural learning—if leaders are willing to embrace vulnerability and complexity. Topics Covered: Why current DEI models fall short in higher education The paradox of racial salience and its impact on reform How institutions can foster “full participation” Why local experimentation drives scalable change The role of discomfort and rupture in institutional learning How to resource and support internal change agents What boards and presidents must do to align DEI with strategy Three Key Takeaways for Leadership: Train leaders to recognize and hold paradox—not resolve it Invest in internal catalysts who can bridge across silos and groups Reframe DEI as mission-aligned infrastructure, not add-on programming Recommended For: Presidents, provosts, board members, DEI officers, and change leaders looking to move beyond check-the-box diversity efforts and create meaningful, sustainable institutional change. Transcript: https://changinghighered.com/dei-is-off-the-table-how-higher-ed-can-still-drive-institutional-change/ #HigherEdLeadership #HigherEdChangeManagement #HigherEducationPodcast #DEI…

Changing Higher Ed

1
Aligning Higher Ed with Workforce Needs and Nontraditional Learners 31:36

12 weeks ago31:36

31:36

Higher education is facing a growing disconnect between traditional academic pathways and the needs of today’s learners and employers. In this episode of the Changing Higher Ed® podcast, Dr. Drumm McNaughton speaks with Kathleen deLaski, founder of Education Design Lab and author of Who Needs College Anymore? , about how institutions can realign academic programs to better serve nontraditional students and meet workforce demands. Drawing from her experience supporting over 1,200 colleges and regional systems, deLaski explores how modular credentials, skills-based learning, and short-term pathways can make higher education more accessible and valuable to adult learners. The conversation highlights how institutions can use design thinking, industry data, and step-ladder credentialing to connect academic outcomes to employment opportunities—without abandoning their core mission. This episode is especially relevant for presidents, trustees, and academic leaders tasked with redesigning programs and structures to improve learner outcomes, increase enrollment, and strengthen workforce relevance. Topics Covered: The rise of nontraditional students and the failures of a degree-first model How institutions can implement skills-based learning and credential transparency Examples of how colleges like Western Governors University are aligning learning with job market demands The importance of employer engagement in curriculum design Why internal silos and legacy structures hinder meaningful innovation How to use step-ladder pathways to improve access, confidence, and long-term outcomes Real-World Examples Discussed: Western Governors University’s use of skills profiles tied to labor market data How community colleges are building modular micro-pathways in partnership with employers The impact of state policy and funding shifts (e.g., Virginia, Colorado, Texas) on institutional priorities Three Key Takeaways for Higher Ed Leadership: Aligning academic programs with workforce needs requires intentional curriculum design and employer input. Modular, stackable credentials offer nontraditional students realistic entry points and long-term pathways to degrees. Institutional structures must adapt to support new models—program redesign alone is not enough. This episode offers actionable insight for institutional leaders committed to expanding access, improving workforce outcomes, and strengthening institutional sustainability. Recommended For: Presidents, provosts, trustees, academic planners, workforce and career pathway leaders, and board members addressing enrollment challenges and labor market alignment. Read the transcript on our website: https://changinghighered.com/align-academic-programs-with-workforce-needs-serve-nontraditional-students/ #HigherEdLeadership #AcademicRedesign #WorkforceAlignment #NontraditionalStudents #HigherEducationPodcast…

Changing Higher Ed

1
Confronting the Storm: Resistance to Change and Current Attacks on Higher Education 37:43

13 weeks ago37:43

37:43

Higher education faces increasing external pressures and diminishing public trust—creating an urgent need for institutional adaptation. In this episode of the Changing Higher Ed® podcast , Dr. Drumm McNaughton speaks with Dr. Brian Rosenberg , former president of Macalister College and author of " Whatever It Is, I'm Against It ," about why resistance to change has made colleges and universities particularly vulnerable to current attacks. Drawing on his 17 years of presidential experience and current perspective as a Harvard visiting professor, Rosenberg analyzes the economic, political, and structural factors undermining public confidence in higher education while offering candid observations about what institutional leaders must do differently to navigate this challenging landscape. This conversation is especially relevant for presidents, trustees, and institutional leaders seeking to understand both external threats and internal barriers to necessary change. Topics Covered: The multiple factors driving declining public confidence in higher education How political polarization and economic concerns about affordability create challenges Why traditional governance structures struggle to implement transformational change The impact of low completion rates (under 60% nationally) on public perception The relationship between boards and presidents during challenging periods Why institutions need to collaborate more effectively against external threats Real-World Examples Discussed: Columbia University as a target of coordinated attacks on higher education Wellesley College's $100,000 comprehensive fee and its impact on public trust The contrast between campus protests today and those of the 1960s Institutions with 30% completion rates that would signal catastrophic failure in other industries The success of community-connected support structures at Amarillo College Three Key Takeaways for Leadership: Presidents must be honest and transparent with stakeholders about institutional challenges. Board members have a responsibility to defend institutional mission—service is a privilege that carries obligations. The board-president relationship is the single most important factor in institutional effectiveness. This episode provides thoughtful analysis for institutional leaders navigating external pressures while managing internal resistance to necessary change. Recommended For: Presidents, trustees, board members, chief financial officers, and enrollment leaders concerned about institutional sustainability and public perception of higher education. Read the transcript: https://changinghighered.com/resistance-to-change-attacks-on-higher-education/ #HigherEdLeadership #InstitutionalChange #BoardGovernance #HigherEducationPodcast…

Changing Higher Ed

1
Strategic Affiliation in Higher Education: What Colleges Can Learn from The Colleges of Law and TCS Education System 32:12

14 weeks ago32:12

32:12

Strategic affiliation in higher education offers an alternative path for institutional sustainability—one that maintains mission and autonomy while accessing shared infrastructure and support. In this episode of the Changing Higher Ed® podcast, Dr. Drumm McNaughton speaks with Dr. Matt Nehmer, President of The Colleges of Law, about his institution’s affiliation with The Community Solution Education System (TCS) and what other leaders should know before pursuing similar strategies. Drawing on his experience as both a college president and former system executive, Nehmer shares how the affiliation was structured, how accreditation and compliance were handled, and what shared services have allowed The Colleges of Law to professionalize operations without sacrificing identity. This conversation is especially relevant for presidents, trustees, and institutional leaders considering affiliation models to improve long-term viability. Topics Covered: Why The Colleges of Law pursued affiliation before it became a necessity The dual-board governance structure that balances autonomy and accountability How legal safeguards protected institutional assets during transition Shared services provided through The Community Solutions system and how they’re managed Accreditation coordination with WASC and the implications of a system model Academic collaboration across system institutions without curriculum loss Leadership communication and the president’s role in system-level engagement Real-World Examples Discussed: Asset protection using a legacy nonprofit entity Cross-listed family law course shared with affiliated institutions Accreditation contingency planning in case of system dissolution Strategic planning coordination across multiple colleges Three Key Takeaways for Leadership: Presidents must actively educate stakeholders about how system affiliation works. Legal and governance structures matter—protect assets and clarify responsibilities. Affiliation doesn’t require cultural compromise; it enables operational focus. This episode provides practical insights for institutions exploring strategic affiliation as a pathway to long-term resilience without sacrificing independence. Recommended For: Presidents, trustees, board members, general counsel, provosts, and system executives considering affiliation or system alignment models in higher education. Read the transcript: https://changinghighered.com/strategic-affiliation-in-higher-education/ #HigherEdLeadership #StrategicAffiliation #Governance #HigherEducationPodcast…

Changing Higher Ed

1
Higher Education Strategic Planning That Drives Growth and Faculty Buy-In 34:20

15 weeks ago34:20

34:20

Strategic planning in higher education isn't just about setting goals—it's about building the kind of stakeholder engagement and leadership alignment that can drive lasting institutional change. In this episode of Changing Higher Ed® podcast , Dr. Drumm McNaughton speaks with Dr. Andrew T. Hsu , President of the College of Charleston, about how a collaborative planning process helped increase enrollment, launch new academic schools, and move the college toward national university status. Drawing on his background in both industry and higher education, Dr. Hsu shares insights into balancing urgency with collaboration, the importance of faculty engagement, and the realities of leading strategic change within shared governance environments. This conversation is especially relevant for presidents, boards, provosts, and leadership teams navigating strategic growth, governance challenges, or long-range institutional transformation. Topics Covered: How strategic planning anchored the College of Charleston’s enrollment growth and academic expansion Why broad faculty engagement strengthens institutional resilience and accelerates change Lessons from balancing urgency for change with the realities of shared governance How industry experience shaped Dr. Hsu’s leadership approach in higher education Governance missteps: What happens when leadership bypasses consultation—and how to correct course Long-term growth planning and the move toward national university status Real-World Examples Discussed: College of Charleston’s creation of Schools of Health Sciences, Natural and Environmental Sciences, and Engineering, Computing, and Mathematics The enrollment surge from 11,000 to 32,000 applications annually under Dr. Hsu’s leadership Policy changes at Charleston to formalize academic reorganization processes after early challenges Three Key Takeaways for Leadership: Build stakeholder ownership early: Strategic planning must involve faculty, staff, students, alumni, and governing boards to ensure success. Respect governance processes: Even well-intentioned leadership actions can falter without proper consultation and transparency. Balance urgency with collaboration: Sustainable change in higher education requires leaders to move decisively while honoring shared governance culture. This episode offers practical strategies for institutions seeking to strengthen their strategic planning efforts and drive sustainable growth through collaborative leadership. Recommended For: Presidents, provosts, trustees, board members, strategic planning leaders, and senior administrators focused on institutional transformation and governance alignment. Read the transcript: https://changinghighered.com/higher-education-strategic-planning-and-growth/ #HigherEdLeadership #StrategicPlanning #SharedGovernance #HigherEducationPodcast…

Changing Higher Ed

1
Capital Funding Strategies in Higher Education: How Universities Are Solving Infrastructure and Student Housing Challenges 32:47

16 weeks ago32:47

32:47

With state capital support on the decline and infrastructure aging out of usefulness, higher education leaders are under pressure to find new ways to fund capital projects—without compromising mission, control, or long-term sustainability. In this episode of Changing Higher Ed® , Dr. Drumm McNaughton explores creative capital funding strategies institutions are using to meet urgent facility and housing demands. His guest, Brent Miller—Higher Education Market Sector Leader at HED —shares how colleges and universities across the country are structuring public-private partnerships (P3s), securing transformational donor gifts, and leveraging local bond initiatives to move large-scale capital plans forward. This conversation is especially relevant for presidents, CFOs, trustees, and VPs of facilities navigating deferred maintenance, campus growth, or strategic repositioning. Brent brings 30+ years of architectural and capital planning experience to the conversation, offering insights from some of the most innovative projects in higher ed capital development. Topics Covered: Why traditional state funding is no longer enough—and what institutions are doing about it How public-private partnerships (P3s) work, and which types of projects they’re best suited for Case studies from USC, UC Irvine, University of Michigan, UC Merced, and more Donor and corporate partnership models that align with institutional missions How local bond initiatives are changing the future of community colleges What boards and presidents need to know about aligning capital projects with strategy and risk Real-World Examples Discussed: USC’s Iovine and Young Academy, funded by a $70M gift from Jimmy Iovine and Dr. Dre UC Irvine’s interdisciplinary health sciences building—merging donor intent and design University of Michigan’s Ford Robotics Building, a co-developed corporate-academic research hub UC Merced 2020, a $1.3B P3 that doubled the university’s physical capacity Cal State San Marcos’ early mixed-use P3 development for housing and retail A facilities deal struck to replace plant equipment at cost and pay via utility savings General Motors University as an early model of industry-aligned higher ed Three Key Takeaways for Leadership: Ensure capital alignment with strategy: Every capital initiative should support the university’s mission, enrollment trajectory, and long-term vision. Build in lifecycle costs: Deferred maintenance and energy savings must be part of the upfront planning—not afterthoughts. Communicate across stakeholders: From boards and donors to students and local communities, transparency is essential to success. This episode provides both a strategic framework and actionable insight into how today’s institutions can overcome capital constraints through innovation, collaboration, and long-range thinking. Recommended For: Presidents, provosts, CFOs, trustees, board chairs, and facilities executives leading campus master planning, housing expansion, or long-term capital strategy. Read the transcript: https://changinghighered.com/capital-funding-strategies-higher-education/ #HigherEdLeadership #PublicPrivatePartnerships #HigherEducation #HigherEducationPodcast…

Changing Higher Ed

1
What’s Fueling the Collapse in Public Trust in Higher Education 32:54

17 weeks ago32:54

32:54

Public confidence in colleges and universities has dropped dramatically—only a third of Americans say they trust higher education. In this episode, Dr. Drumm McNaughton talks with Dr. Courtney Brown, Vice President of Strategic Impact and Planning at Lumina Foundation, about Gallup–Lumina’s latest findings and what institutional leaders must do to address the affordability and workforce relevance concerns behind this erosion of trust. They also explore Lumina’s new 2040 goal: 75% credential attainment—with a focus on value, not just completion. What we cover in this episode: Gallup data on declining public trust in higher education The ROI paradox: affordability vs. long-term economic benefit Why public perception is shifting—even as current students see value What Lumina’s 75x2040 goal means for institutional strategy How colleges can realign offerings to workforce expectations Supporting adult learners and restoring trust through transparency Read the full show summary and access the transcript here: https://changinghighered.com/public-trust-in-higher-education-lumina/ #HigherEducation #CollegeAffordability #CollegeROI About Our Guest Dr. Courtney Brown is Vice President of Strategic Impact and Planning at Lumina Foundation. She leads research, learning, and strategic initiatives aimed at increasing access to quality credentials for all Americans. About the Host Dr. Drumm McNaughton is CEO of The Change Leader and host of the Changing Higher Ed podcast. He works with higher education boards and leadership teams to improve governance, lead strategic transformation, and navigate accreditation and institutional effectiveness.…

Changing Higher Ed

1
Using Faculty Satisfaction Data for Strategic Change in Higher Education 36:13

18 weeks ago36:13

36:13

Most institutions survey their faculty, but few turn that data into meaningful action. This episode explores how higher education leaders can use faculty satisfaction data to inform strategic planning , strengthen shared governance , retain talent, and lead institutional change . Dr. Drumm McNaughton is joined by Dr. R. Todd Benson , Executive Director of COACHE (Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher Education) , to examine how institutions are applying faculty data in more intentional ways. The conversation focuses on how leadership can move from reporting results to building trust, aligning leadership decisions with faculty needs, and implementing sustained improvements. Benson outlines COACHE’s three-year cycle, where survey data serves not as a static report card, but as the starting point for structured, campus-wide conversations. Institutions are encouraged to engage faculty in interpreting the data, identifying top priorities, and co-owning the solutions. This approach helps shift the focus from compliance and benchmarking to long-term capacity building. Shared governance is a recurring theme throughout the episode. Benson explains how survey questions are designed to test whether faculty and administration are operating in a framework of mutual trust and responsibility. He shares examples where even well-documented governance structures break down due to weak relationships or inconsistent communication—issues that leadership can’t fix with policy alone. The episode also breaks down COACHE’s findings from the national Faculty Retention and Exit Study. Three factors consistently predict faculty satisfaction and attrition: how time is allocated, how resources align with expectations, and whether leadership is seen as trustworthy and transparent. These drivers connect directly to institutional risk, culture, and long-term sustainability. Examples from Georgia State University and the University of Texas at Arlington show how institutions can take action. Georgia State created a public-facing COACHE dashboard that connects findings to actual decisions. UT Arlington’s faculty senate led the charge, collaborating with administration to develop a shared scorecard and secure resources to address salary equity and improve doctoral student recruitment. For presidents, provosts, and boards, the message is clear: collecting faculty data isn’t enough. The real work happens in what you do next. What higher ed leaders will learn in this episode: How to engage faculty in prioritizing and interpreting satisfaction data What shared governance metrics reveal about institutional health How time, trust, and support shape retention Why transparency and follow-through matter more than data volume What successful institutions are doing to move from insight to action Three takeaways for higher ed leadership: Communicate clearly and consistently—before, during, and after surveys Share the human impact of faculty work, not just metrics Recognize and reflect value back to your faculty in ways that build trust Bonus insight: “The absolute worst feeling of a leader is to turn around and find no one’s following.” As Dr. Drumm McNaughton explains, leadership isn’t just about making decisions—it’s about building the trust and relationships that make people want to follow. Without that, strategy fails before it begins. Read the transcript of this episode at https://changinghighered.com/faculty-satisfaction-data-for-strategic-change-in-higher-ed/ #HigherEducationPodcast #HigherEducation #FacultySatisfaction…

Changing Higher Ed

1
Short-Term Credentials: What College Leaders Should Know 36:14

19 weeks ago36:14

36:14

As short-term credentials gain traction, higher ed leaders face a critical question: Are these programs truly cost-effective and accessible—or just shorter? In this episode, Dr. Drumm McNaughton speaks with Jinann Bitar, Director of Higher Ed Research and Data Analytics at Education Trust, about the cost-efficiency, accessibility, and policy implications of short-term credential programs. They discuss new research on program affordability, disparities across states and industries, and the limited long-term earnings data available. Jinann shares what institutions need to consider before integrating short-term credentials into their academic portfolios and how leaders can ensure these programs support—not undermine—student success. Topics Covered: Are short-term credentials really affordable? How their costs compare to traditional academic programs State-level enrollment trends and policy drivers Gaps in ROI and earnings data Why stackable credentials matter How presidents and boards should approach academic restructuring Three Takeaways for College Leaders: Use data to guide program decisions Collaborate with external partners to align with labor market needs Design short-term programs that meet the expectations of today’s learners This conversation is especially relevant for institutions exploring academic realignment, workforce partnerships, or strategic planning initiatives. Read the transcript at https://changinghighered.com/what-college-leaders-must-know-about-short-term-credentials/ #HigherEducation #ShortTermCredentials #HigherEducationPodcast Guest: Jinann Bitar , Director of Higher Education Research and Data Analytics, Education Trust Host: Dr. Drumm McNaughton , Higher Education Consultant and CEO of The Change Leader…

Changing Higher Ed

1
Washington Update: Dismantling the Department of Education and Redefining Oversight for Higher Ed 39:51

20 weeks ago39:51

39:51

Tom Netting, president of TEN Government Strategies and a trusted Washington insider, returns to provide a critical update on sweeping federal changes affecting higher education. In conversation with Drumm McNaughton, he breaks down the Trump administration’s executive order to dismantle the Department of Education, a move that’s already led to major staff reductions and the redistribution of responsibilities across other federal agencies. Key Discussion Points Structural Overhaul of the Department of Education: Nearly 50% of ED staff have been laid off, including in core offices such as Federal Student Aid and the Office for Civil Rights. Regional participation offices have been shut down, leaving institutions without direct support contacts. The shift of student loan collections to the Small Business Administration signals an unprecedented reorganization of oversight. Title IX and Civil Rights Rollbacks: The Supreme Court overturned Biden-era Title IX rules, reinstating Trump-era standards. Protections for transgender students and DEI-related compliance structures are being reversed or defunded. OCR layoffs jeopardize ongoing investigations and reduce institutional support. Policy Enforcement Through Funding Threats: Columbia University’s $400M in federal funding was withheld and later restored after accepting federal conditions, including police authority to arrest student protesters and the appointment of an academic overseer. These enforcement tactics set a new precedent, raising concerns about academic freedom and governance. Student Loan Crisis and Risk Exposure: Delinquency rates are reportedly spiking, with internal policy discussions suggesting 70–80% of borrowers may be behind. Institutions face growing exposure as default risks rise, with potential Title IV eligibility consequences. Risk-sharing legislation and budget reconciliation proposals could place financial liability on colleges for unpaid loans. Governance, Autonomy, and Institutional Strategy: Boards must take a more active role in navigating federal restructuring and enforcement trends. The implications go beyond compliance—federal funding is increasingly tied to campus culture, policy, and speech. Strategic responses now require governance-level attention to protect institutional mission and integrity. Three Key Takeaways for Higher Education Leaders and Boards Reassure students that aid is still available and prepare them for repayment obligations now managed under new federal structures. Support compliance and financial aid staff as they navigate the loss of regional ED contacts and fast-changing guidance. Re-evaluate governance-level policies on Title IX, DEI, and civil rights to ensure legal alignment and institutional resilience. Download the March 2025 Higher Ed Board Briefing (PDF) → Read the transcript at: https://changinghighered.com/washington-update-dismantling-the-department-of-education/ #HigherEducation #DepartmentofEducation #HigherEdPolicy About Our Podcast Guest Tom Netting Having spent all of his professional career devoted to higher education policy oversight and implementation, Tom Netting has an extensive knowledge of the laws and regulations governing all aspects of higher education. His considerable background and experience have afforded him the opportunity to view the development and implementation of federal higher education and workforce development policy in their entirety – including issues related to higher education and workforce development, health care, veteran affairs policies, and the procurement of federal appropriations. About the Host Dr. Drumm McNaughton is the founder, CEO, and Principal Consultant at The Change Leader, Inc . A highly sought-after higher education consultant with 20+ years of experience, Dr. McNaughton works with leadership, management, and boards of both U.S. and international institutions. His expertise spans key areas, including accreditation, governance, strategic planning, presidential onboarding, mergers, acquisitions, and strategic alliances. Dr. McNaughton’s approach combines a holistic methodology with a deep understanding of the contemporary and evolving challenges facing higher education institutions worldwide to ensure his clients succeed in their mission.…

Changing Higher Ed

1
Enrollment Marketing Strategy: How to Attract Students and Align Programs 37:12

21 weeks ago37:12

37:12

Enrollment marketing strategy is no longer optional—it’s essential for institutions looking to grow in a competitive, high-cost digital environment. In this episode, Dr. Drumm McNaughton speaks with Max DesMarais, Director of Strategy at Vital, about how colleges and universities can use data, content strategy, and full-funnel marketing to improve student recruitment and ensure academic offerings align with demand. Building an Effective Enrollment Marketing Strategy Validate program demand before launch using research, polling, and student behavior data. Use student-friendly program names that match what prospective learners are searching for. Treat marketing as a strategic function, not just an operational cost. Improving Program Visibility and Differentiation Define what sets your programs apart—and communicate it clearly. Avoid generic messaging; focus on outcomes, flexibility, and student needs. Promote content that supports early-stage decision-making, not just applications. Aligning Programs with Market Needs Adjust program format, pricing, and positioning to reflect real-world demand. Consider flexible tuition strategies and delivery models for nontraditional learners. Use community and employer input to shape offerings before they launch. Three Takeaways for University Presidents and Boards Lead with Research – Don’t greenlight programs or campaigns without validating student and employer interest. Invest in Full-Funnel Marketing – Build awareness and trust early to reduce cost per lead and improve conversions. Clarify Differentiation – Know what makes your institution unique and ensure it’s reflected in every message. Institutions that align marketing, academic planning, and student insights will be positioned to thrive in a shrinking enrollment environment. Tune in to learn how to sharpen your enrollment marketing strategy and build a more responsive, competitive institution. Read the transcript on our website: https://changinghighered.com/enrollment-marketing-strategy-how-to-attract-students-and-align-programs/ #EnrollmentMarketing #HigherEdLeadership #AcademicProgramGrowth #StudentRecruitmentStrategy About Our Podcast Guest Max DesMarais runs the digital marketing strategy and paid advertising departments at Vital, managing online marketing activity and processes for a wide variety of clients - including Vital's own marketing department. He has a specialization in education and has helped dozens of clients improve the results and efficiency of their marketing strategy. Connect with Max DesMarais on LinkedIn → About the Podcast Host Dr. Drumm McNaughton is the founder, CEO, and Principal Consultant at The Change Leader, Inc . A highly sought-after higher education consultant with 20+ years of experience, Dr. McNaughton works with leadership, management, and boards of U.S. and international institutions. His expertise spans key areas, including accreditation, governance, strategic planning, presidential onboarding, mergers, acquisitions, and strategic alliances. Dr. McNaughton’s approach combines a holistic methodology with a deep understanding of the contemporary and evolving challenges facing higher education institutions worldwide to ensure his clients succeed in their mission. Connect with Drumm McNaughton on LinkedIn→…

Changing Higher Ed

1
Higher Education Innovation That Builds Workforce-Ready Graduates 40:24

22 weeks ago40:24

40:24

80% of Champlain College graduates land jobs in their field of study—because the college designed its model to make students workforce ready. In this episode, Dr. Drumm McNaughton speaks with Alex Hernandez, President of Champlain College, about how higher education institutions can build their innovation muscle to realign academic programs with workforce needs and improve graduate outcomes. Building the Innovation Muscle Strategic planning is treated as an annual, living process —not a static document. Faculty co-design new academic models, driving institution-wide innovation. Innovation is embedded in culture, not dependent on top-down initiatives. Aligning Curriculum with Workforce Demands Champlain’s Upside-Down Curriculum introduces major-specific coursework in year one. Students access internships early, building career experience before graduation. Programs are shaped by employer input to match real workforce needs. Leveraging Employer and Community Partnerships Industry partnerships inform curriculum and create pathways to employment. Dual enrollment initiatives like Vermont Cybersports expand access and impact. Regional collaboration addresses talent shortages and economic development. Three Takeaways for University Presidents and Boards Clarify the North Star – Align planning and programs around a focused mission: preparing students for work, life, and impact. Focus Resources Strategically – Prioritize high-value initiatives and say no to what doesn’t serve institutional goals. Build Institutional Trust – Innovation happens at the speed of trust. Engage faculty and staff in designing the future. Higher education leaders have an opportunity to evolve their institutions through intentional planning, faculty-driven innovation, and academic realignment that prepares graduates for today’s—and tomorrow’s—workforce. Read the transcript on our website: https://changinghighered.com/higher-education-innovation-builds-workforce-ready-graduates/ #HigherEdInnovation #StrategicPlanning #AcademicRealignment #WorkforceReadyGraduates About Our Podcast Guest Alex Hernandez is the tenth president of Champlain College , a private independent college in Burlington, VT renowned for its innovative approach to getting students Ready: Ready for Work, Ready for Life, and Ready to Make a Difference. Over eighty percent of Champlain graduates are employed in jobs related to their field of study. Champlain College is Building on Vermont’s Strengths through innovative pathways that prepare students for careers in leading industries and grow local economies. Prior to Champlain, Alex was the Dean of the School of Continuing and Professional Studies (SCPS) and Vice Provost of Online Learning at the University of Virginia. Before that, Alex was a leader in K-12 education, working as a teacher, administrator, and partner of a national foundation. He is a fierce advocate for education opportunity, access, and innovation. He lives in Burlington with his wife Michelle and has twin sons in college. Connect with Alex Hernandez on LinkedIn → About the Podcast Host Dr. Drumm McNaughton is the founder, CEO, and Principal Consultant at The Change Leader, Inc . A highly sought-after higher education consultant with 20+ years of experience, Dr. McNaughton works with leadership, management, and boards of U.S. and international institutions. His expertise spans key areas, including accreditation, governance, strategic planning, presidential onboarding, mergers, acquisitions, and strategic alliances. Dr. McNaughton’s approach combines a holistic methodology with a deep understanding of the contemporary and evolving challenges facing higher education institutions worldwide to ensure his clients succeed in their mission. Connect with Drumm McNaughton on LinkedIn→…

Changing Higher Ed

1
The Hidden Enrollment Market in Workforce Education 37:34

23 weeks ago37:34

37:34

There are 41.5 million Americans who left college without earning a degree—but many would return if given the right opportunity. In this episode, Dr. Drumm McNaughton speaks with Alana Rose, Vice President of Academic Networks at InStride, about how workforce education and corporate partnerships can unlock a hidden enrollment market. The Workforce Education Advantage Employer-funded education provides debt-free learning opportunities for employees. Workforce development programs help companies upskill employees and retain talent. Higher education institutions gain access to non-traditional learners and new revenue streams. Meeting the Needs of Non-Traditional Students Online and hybrid learning formats offer flexibility for working adults. Stackable credentials and credit for prior learning support degree completion. Institutions must provide tailored student support to improve retention. Aligning Higher Ed with Workforce Needs Corporate partnerships ensure programs match industry demands. Employers seek a balance of technical, business, and durable skills. Advisory boards help shape relevant curricula. Three Takeaways for University Presidents and Boards Leverage Corporate Partnerships – Workforce education is a growing enrollment strategy. Lower Barriers to Access – Flexible pathways and support services drive student success. Invest in Institutional Resources – Dedicated staff is essential for scaling employer-funded education. Workforce education presents a major opportunity for higher education leaders. Tune in to learn how institutions can align with corporate needs, create sustainable enrollment pipelines, and provide meaningful educational pathways for non-traditional students. Read the transcript on our website: https://changinghighered.com/hidden-enrollment-market-in-workforce-education/ #HigherEdEnrollment #WorkforceEducation #EmployerSponsoredEducation About Our Podcast Guest Alana Rose is Vice President of Academic Network at InStride , where she leads partnerships with top-tier universities and educational institutions to deliver innovative workforce education programs. With over a decade of experience in higher education and university relations, Alana has a proven track record of fostering partnerships that drive institutional growth and expand access to education for working learners. Prior to InStride, Alana held leadership roles at Emeritus and 2U, overseeing operations for university partners and scaling global online education programs. Alana earned her B.A. in Psychology from the University of Southern California. Connect with Alana Rose on LinkedIn → About the Podcast Host Dr. Drumm McNaughton is the founder, CEO, and Principal Consultant at The Change Leader, Inc . A highly sought-after higher education consultant with 20+ years of experience, Dr. McNaughton works with leadership, management, and boards of U.S. and international institutions. His expertise spans key areas, including accreditation, governance, strategic planning, presidential onboarding, mergers, acquisitions, and strategic alliances. Dr. McNaughton’s approach combines a holistic methodology with a deep understanding of the contemporary and evolving challenges facing higher education institutions worldwide to ensure his clients succeed in their mission. Connect with Drumm McNaughton on LinkedIn→…

Changing Higher Ed

1
Transforming College Advising: A New Approach to Student Success 42:22

24 weeks ago42:22

42:22

Higher education institutions continue to struggle with student retention, career readiness, and underemployment among graduates. Traditional college advising models focus heavily on selecting a major, yet many students graduate with empty degrees that fail to translate into meaningful careers. In this episode of Changing Higher Ed® , Dr. Drumm McNaughton speaks with Scott Carlson and Dr. Ned Scott Laff, authors of Hacking College: Why the Major Really Doesn’t Matter and What Really Does , about how institutions can rethink academic advising, faculty engagement, and student success strategies to better serve today’s learners. Carlson, a senior writer for the Chronicle of Higher Education , and Laff, who has over 35 years of experience in college and university settings helping students design successful undergraduate experiences, discuss how universities can shift away from a rigid, major-centric model to a personalized student success framework . They explain how students who lack career clarity often end up in underemployment, taking jobs unrelated to their degrees. Their research shows that institutions must evolve their advising structures to help students identify vocational purpose, leverage experiential learning, and navigate the hidden job market. The Problem with Traditional Academic Advising The outdated focus on major selection leads students into rigid career paths, often misaligned with their strengths and interests. A one-size-fits-all advising model leaves first-generation and low-income students struggling to navigate the complexities of higher education . Limited faculty-student engagement prevents students from leveraging university resources and professional networks. Lack of career-aligned experiential learning results in students graduating without the necessary skills and industry connections. Revolutionizing College-to-Career Transition Carlson and Laff propose a new model where higher education leaders integrate career-focused advising and faculty mentorship into the student experience. This involves: Helping students explore hidden intellectualism—their deeper interests and skills that could shape their career trajectories. Connecting students with faculty and industry professionals to uncover career pathways beyond traditional job titles . Expanding experiential learning opportunities through internships, mentorships, and project-based learning . Teaching students to research the hidden job market to discover roles they might never encounter through a standard career fair. Institutional Strategies for Student Success For university presidents, boards, and executive leaders, improving student outcomes requires a fundamental shift in how advising and faculty engagement are structured. Institutions should: Encourage faculty to act as mentors, guiding students beyond coursework to explore real-world career applications. Train advisors to support students in creating flexible, goal-oriented academic plans that integrate experiential learning. Strengthen career services by building industry partnerships and embedding career readiness into academic programming. Utilize existing institutional resources—including government affairs, research opportunities, and alumni networks—to connect students with career pathways. The Hidden Job Market and Career Readiness Career exploration should begin early in a student’s academic journey. Institutions must help students develop the ability to recognize opportunities beyond traditional job titles by: Encouraging proactive networking with faculty, professionals, and industry leaders. Teaching students to research and navigate the hidden job market, where many opportunities exist outside of standard recruitment channels. Expanding experiential learning options, such as internships and project-based coursework, to provide practical experience that aligns with evolving workforce demands. With AI-driven automation threatening traditional advising roles, institutions must act now to redefine how they support student career pathways. Colleges that fail to adapt will continue to see declining retention, underemployment, and dissatisfaction among graduates. Five Takeaways for University Presidents and Boards Be Open to Change – Institutions must actively remove barriers that prevent student success. The current advising model is failing many students, and colleges need to adopt a more flexible, student-centered approach that helps learners navigate their academic and career paths effectively. Preserve Academic Variety – Colleges are eliminating liberal arts programs due to financial pressures, but this limits students' ability to create multidisciplinary educational experiences. Institutions should strive to maintain a diverse academic landscape that allows students to explore various career pathways. Engage Directly with Students – University leaders should make an effort to understand student concerns firsthand. By informally engaging with students—whether in common areas or casual settings—presidents and board members can gain valuable insights into what students need to thrive. Empower Students to Take Ownership of Their Education – Instead of following rigid degree structures, students should be encouraged to design their own academic experiences by integrating coursework, experiential learning, and industry engagement in ways that align with their career goals. Advisors and faculty should support this by shifting from a prescriptive model to one that helps students think critically about their education. Rethink Institutional Priorities – Colleges can maintain their research and tenure agendas while also fostering a culture that encourages student success. Leaders should create systems that help students perceive higher education as an interconnected network of opportunities rather than a series of disconnected courses. Higher education institutions that fail to evolve will continue to see declining retention and job placement rates. Listen in as Dr. Drumm McNaughton, Scott Carlson, and Dr. Ned Laff explore how colleges can implement meaningful advising reforms to improve student success, institutional sustainability, and long-term career outcomes. Institutions looking for solutions to align their academic programs with evolving student needs should explore Academic Realignment and Redesign strategies. Read the podcast transcript on our website: https://changinghighered.com/transforming-college-advising-new-approach-to-student-success/ #AcademicAdvising #HigherEducation #StudentSuccess About the Podcast Guests Dr. Ned Scott Laff has over 35 years of experience in college and university settings, helping students design successful undergraduate experiences. He has taught both English and Honors courses and has broad interests in liberal arts education, the quality of undergraduate education, and the role of academic advising in liberal learning. He was Founding Director of the Center for the Junior Year at Governors State University; Director for Advising at Augustana College; the Director for General Education, Director of Contractual Studies, Director for Service-Learning and Director of the Center for Engaged Learning at Columbia College; former Academic Program Coordinator for Core Curriculum and Director for First Year Seminar at Loyola University Chicago. He has served as Director for Academic Program Development at Barat College of DePaul University; and as Associate Dean for Curriculum at Mundelein College of Loyola University Chicago. Connect with Ned Scott Laff on LinkedIn → Scott Carlson is a senior writer at The Chronicle of Higher Education who explores where higher education is headed. Since 1999, he has covered a range of issues for the publication: college management and finance, facilities, campus planning, energy, sustainability, libraries, workforce development, the value of a college degree, and other subjects. He has written such in-depth reports as “Sustaining the College Business Model,” “The Future of Work,” “The Right Mix of Academic Programs,” “The Campus as City,” and “The Outsourced University.” Carlson has won awards from the Education Writers Association and is a frequent speaker at colleges and conferences around the country. His work has also appeared in The Baltimore Sun and Baltimore City Paper, among other publications. He is a graduate of the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities. Connect with Scott Carlson on LinkedIn → About the Podcast Host Dr. Drumm McNaughton is the founder, CEO, and Principal Consultant at The Change Leader, Inc . A highly sought-after higher education consultant with 20+ years of experience, Dr. McNaughton works with leadership, management, and boards of U.S. and international institutions. His expertise spans key areas, including accreditation, governance, strategic planning, presidential onboarding, mergers, acquisitions, and strategic alliances. Dr. McNaughton’s approach combines a holistic methodology with a deep understanding of the contemporary and evolving challenges facing higher education institutions worldwide to ensure his clients succeed in their mission. Connect with Drumm McNaughton on LinkedIn→…

Changing Higher Ed

1
Top Risks in Higher Education and Why Leaders Must Have ERM Programs 40:58

25 weeks ago40:58

40:58

Justin Kollinger, Senior Risk Management Consultant at United Educators (UE), brings valuable perspective in helping colleges and universities develop strategic risk initiatives. As co-author of "Risk Management: An Accountability Guide for University and College Boards" and creator of UE's annual Top 10 Risks report, Kollinger works with institution leaders to develop strategic risk initiatives, prioritize risk management goals, and launch enterprise risk management programs. Higher Ed's Current Risk & Liability Environment The higher education sector faces what United Educators calls "social inflation" - increases in insurance costs above regular inflation. This trend is driven by: Increased third-party litigation financing Growing recruitment of plaintiffs to bring cases Rising defense costs Higher settlements and awards Top Risks in Higher Education McNaughton and Kollinger discuss these top risks revealed in the UE's annual survey: Enrollment Data Security Operational Pressures Recruitment and Hiring Regulatory and Legal Compliance Student Mental Health Funding Facilities and Deferred Maintenance Public Safety Three-way tie: General Premises Safety Title IX Political and Societal Pressures Notable findings include the consistency of the top seven risks over the past three years despite 2024's tumultuous environment. Surprisingly, climate change and environmental risks did not make the top ten despite increasing natural disasters affecting campuses nationwide. Enterprise Risk Management in Higher Education Dr. McNaughton noted that only about 5% of institutions have formalized risk management programs . Both experts emphasized that when creating strategic plans , institutions must include risk management planning , or they leave themselves exposed. Risk management should distinguish between: University Level: Risk management and identification Board Level: Risk oversight and appropriate questioning Data Security Challenges The conversation highlighted growing concerns about data security: Rising costs for data breach coverage Need for centralized IT management Growing sophistication of phishing attempts with AI Importance of comprehensive security training Three Takeaways for University Presidents and Boards Culture of Risk Management ("Cool Head, Warm Heart") Manage risk with thoughtful foresight and consistent policies Show care to your community before, during, and after incidents Focus on building trust through demonstrated care and communication Elevate Your Risk Manager Risk managers often know everything happening on campus They have unique problem-solving tools They should be positioned as strategic contributors If you don't have a risk manager, get one Use Third-Party Experts Take advantage of insurer resources (like UE's checklists and online courses) Utilize insurance broker resources Access association resources and experts Remember these experts are part of your support ecosystem Kollinger's insights emphasize that while establishing risk management programs may seem daunting, having basic frameworks in place can help institutions better prepare for and respond to various challenges. His message underscores the importance of both strategic thinking and demonstrated care in building effective risk management programs. The changing landscape of higher education requires leaders to remain vigilant in their approach to risk management, making it an essential component of institutional strategy and governance. #HigherEducation #HigherEducationRiskManagement #HigherEducationPodcast Read the transcript on our website : https://changinghighered.com/top-risks-in-higher-education-erm-programs/ Links to Resources: UE's Top Risks Report: Insights for Higher Education UE's Large Loss Report (featuring settlements over $2.5 million) Risk Management: An Accountability Guide for University and College Boards (AGB) Enterprise Risk Management In Higher Ed Part 1: An Overview of the Planning Process Enterprise Risk Management in Higher Ed Part 2: Risk Planning and its Critical Role in Higher Education Enterprise Risk Management in Higher Ed Part 3: Risk Oversight and the Board’s Role in Higher Education Risk Management Strategic Risk Planning to Chart Higher Ed’s Course in Turbulent Times What is Enterprise Risk Management in Higher Education? About Our Podcast Guest Justin Kollinger serves as Senior Risk Management Consultant at United Educators , an education-owned liability insurance carrier serving 1,500 institutions across the country. In his role, Justin advises college and university leaders as they develop strategic risk initiatives, prioritize risk management goals, and launch or refresh enterprise risk management (ERM) initiatives. He co-authored Risk Management: An Accountability Guide for University and College Boards, published by AGB Press, and creates reports and tools to help United Educators’ members address their top risks, including risks relating to enrollment and student life. Risk & Insurance recognized Justin as one of its Risk All Stars in 2023, and Justin has previously worked in enrollment at two private institutions in the Mid-Atlantic and as a consultant to community college presidents and independent heads of school. Connect with Justin Kollinger on LinkedIn → About the Podcast Host Dr. Drumm McNaughton is the founder, CEO, and Principal Consultant at The Change Leader, Inc . A highly sought-after higher education consultant with 20+ years of experience, Dr. McNaughton works with leadership, management, and boards of U.S. and international institutions. His expertise spans key areas, including accreditation, governance, strategic planning, presidential onboarding, mergers, acquisitions, and strategic alliances. Dr. McNaughton’s approach combines a holistic methodology with a deep understanding of the contemporary and evolving challenges facing higher education institutions worldwide to ensure his clients succeed in their mission. Connect with Drumm McNaughton on LinkedIn→…

Changing Higher Ed

1
The Layperson's Prescriptive to ADA Compliance in Higher Education 31:13

26 weeks ago31:13

31:13

New Federal ADA Regulation Deadlines Are Approaching – Is Your Institution Ready? Colleges and universities must now meet stricter ADA compliance requirements for websites and digital content or risk legal consequences, fines, and loss of federal funding. With the Department of Justice’s latest update to Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) , institutions must ensure all web content, mobile apps, and digital resources meet WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility standards. For many schools, the deadline is approaching fast. In this episode of Changing Higher Ed® , host Dr. Drumm McNaughton has a conversation with Eugene Woo, CEO and founder of Venngage, to discuss what these new ADA regulations mean for higher education institutions and what they must do to comply. Understanding the New ADA Requirements for Higher Ed The Department of Justice’s update to Title II clarifies long-standing accessibility expectations, removing ambiguity about digital compliance. Now, all institutions receiving federal funds—including financial aid, research grants, or disaster relief—must ensure their online content adheres to Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1. AA The key changes include: Explicit standards for websites and mobile apps – Digital accessibility is no longer optional. Clearer rules on compliance deadlines – Larger institutions (50,000+ students) must comply by April 2026, while smaller institutions have until April 2027. Greater enforcement risks – ADA lawsuits have historically driven accessibility improvements, and these new regulations are meant to make institutions proactive rather than reactive. Woo explains that many universities operate hundreds, if not thousands, of websites across different departments and programs, making compliance a daunting task. Why ADA Compliance Matters for Colleges and Universities Accessibility Isn’t Just a Legal Obligation—It’s a Universal Design Best Practice Woo highlights that designing for accessibility benefits everyone, not just individuals with disabilities. Features like captions for videos were initially created for the hearing impaired but are now widely used by all viewers. The Biggest Accessibility Challenges for Higher Ed Websites According to WebAIM’s annual survey of the top one million websites, these are the most common accessibility issues: Missing alt text for images – Over 50% of homepage images lack descriptions, making content inaccessible to screen readers. Poor form accessibility – Online forms frequently lack proper labels, creating barriers for those using assistive technology. Non-descriptive links and buttons – Generic link text (e.g., “Click here”) makes navigation difficult for screen reader users. Inaccessible PDFs – Many course materials, syllabi, and administrative documents are in PDF format but lack proper tagging and readability. Color contrast issues – Up to 20% of men have some form of color blindness, yet many websites fail to meet the contrast requirements. 3. What Institutions Should Prioritize First Given the scale of most universities’ digital footprints, Woo recommends: Conducting an ADA compliance audit to identify accessibility gaps. Prioritizing high-traffic pages and critical student services for remediation. Implementing universal design principles in new content to prevent future accessibility issues. How Universities Can Ensure ADA Compliance Designating Leadership Responsibility Presidents and institutional leaders must appoint a compliance officer or team responsible for ensuring accessibility across all digital platforms. Without clear ownership, accessibility efforts can fall through the cracks. Leverage AI and Automated Accessibility Tools for ADA Compliance Woo notes that institutions can use AI-powered tools to scan websites for accessibility violations and assist in remediation. Some platforms can even auto-correct PDFs and web pages to bring them closer to WCAG 2.1 standards. Budgeting for Digital Accessibility Compliance Compliance isn’t just a policy issue—it requires financial investment. Schools must allocate resources for accessibility audits, technology upgrades, and training to ensure long-term compliance. Three Key Takeaways for Higher Education Leaders Determine whether your institution must comply—and by when Institutions receiving any federal funding must meet the new standards, with large universities facing an April 2026 deadline. Appoint a leader or team to oversee accessibility compliance Without clear accountability, compliance efforts will stall. Universities must assign responsibility to IT, compliance, or academic leadership teams. Invest in accessibility tools and training ADA compliance isn’t just a one-time fix. Schools should budget for ongoing accessibility improvements, staff training, and technological upgrades. Higher education institutions can no longer afford to overlook digital accessibility. With the DOJ’s new enforcement push, now is the time to act. Listen to the full episode for more insights from Eugene Woo and practical strategies for making your institution’s digital content fully accessible. Disclaimer: This podcast and its accompanying show notes are provided for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. We recommend that institutions consult a qualified compliance officer or legal counsel regarding ADA compliance or any other legal matters. Read the podcast transcript on our website: https://changinghighered.com/ada-compliance-in-higher-education/ #HigherEducation #ADACompliance #HigherEdPodcast About Our Podcast Guest Eugene Woo is the CEO and founder of Venngage , an infographic design platform that enables users to create compelling and accessible visual content. With over two decades of experience in software engineering and product development, Eugene has a strong background in engineering and a passion for visual storytelling. Prior to Venngage, he founded Vizualize.Me, a platform for creating visual résumés, which was acquired by Parchment in 2013. Eugene holds a Master of Science in Planning from the University of Toronto and a Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering from the Illinois Institute of Technology Connect with Eugene Woo on LinkedIn → About the Podcast Host Dr. Drumm McNaughton is the founder, CEO, and Principal Consultant at The Change Leader, Inc . A highly sought-after higher education consultant with 20+ years of experience, Dr. McNaughton works with leadership, management, and boards of U.S. and international institutions. His expertise spans key areas, including accreditation, governance, strategic planning, presidential onboarding, mergers, acquisitions, and strategic alliances. Dr. McNaughton’s approach combines a holistic methodology with a deep understanding of the contemporary and evolving challenges facing higher education institutions worldwide to ensure his clients succeed in their mission. Connect with Drumm McNaughton on LinkedIn→…

Changing Higher Ed

1
The Glass Cliff in Higher Education: Challenges Faced by Women University Presidents 46:33

27 weeks ago46:33

46:33

According to recent ACE presidential survey data, women now constitute 33% of university presidencies, yet a troubling pattern has emerged: these leaders are often appointed during times of institutional crisis, creating what researchers call "the glass cliff" phenomenon. In this episode of Changing Higher Ed®, Dr. Lori Varlotta, former president of Hiram College and California Lutheran University and current Distinguished Professor of Higher Education Leadership at Cal Lutheran, shares insights from her research on the glass cliff phenomenon in higher education. Drawing from her first research sabbatical in 40 years, she explores how women presidents are often hired during periods of institutional vulnerability and what can be done to ensure their success. The glass cliff differs significantly from the well-known glass ceiling concept. While the glass ceiling refers to invisible barriers preventing women from reaching top leadership positions, the glass cliff describes a phenomenon where women are specifically recruited for leadership roles during times of institutional crisis or vulnerability. In higher education, this vulnerability typically manifests as enrollment declines, decreasing net tuition revenue, grant funding challenges, or cultural crises. Dr. Varlotta's research reveals that women presidents face unique obstacles when leading institutional turnarounds, often facing implicit bias, gender-based generalizations about their performance, and disproportionate scrutiny of their appearance and leadership style through gender-charged reporting. Key Takeaways for Prospective University Presidents and Boards 1. Due Diligence: Carefully assess whether the campus truly wants the bold, transparent leadership they claim to seek during the hiring process. Engage in extensive conversations with the board to ensure alignment between stated goals and actual support. 2. Resource Commitment: Secure essential resources before accepting the position, including PR support, crisis communication expertise, and a dedicated board committee willing to serve as change management partners. 3. Gender-Charged Reporting: Be prepared for heightened scrutiny of appearance, mannerisms, and communication style. As highlighted in the research, women leaders often face disproportionate attention to non-performance factors compared to their male counterparts. As higher education faces continuing challenges, understanding and addressing the glass cliff phenomenon becomes increasingly essential for institutional success. Dr. Varlotta's research highlights the importance of careful preparation, adequate support systems, and recognition of the unique challenges faced by women leaders in academic turnaround situations. Read the transcript on our website: https://changinghighered.com/the-glass-cliff-in-higher-education-challenges-faced-by-women-university-presidents/ #GlassCliff #UniversityGovernance #HigherEdLeadership About Our Podcast Guest For four decades, Lori Varlotta, Ph.D. , has held leadership positions at universities large and small, public and private, faith-based and secular, stand-alone and system-embedded. For 20+ years, she has served at the executive level: Senior VP at Sacramento State and President at Hiram College (OH) and California Lutheran University. In both presidencies, Varlotta was the first woman at the institution to hold the post. At each, she was recruited to lead systemic changes to reposition the institution for the future. Along with the turnaround and repositioning work for which she is known, Varlotta contributes routinely to national conversations and publications on student success, systemic change, integrated planning and budgeting, curricular and co-curricular prioritization, shared governance, and DEIJ. As a first-generation college student, she is grateful for the educational opportunities she has experienced. She credits her blue-collar family and community, however, for teaching her life’s most important lessons. Connect with Lori Varlotta on LinkedIn → About the Podcast Host Dr. Drumm McNaughton is the founder, CEO, and Principal Consultant at The Change Leader, Inc . A highly sought-after higher education consultant with 20+ years of experience, Dr. McNaughton works with leadership, management, and boards of U.S. and international institutions. His expertise spans key areas, including accreditation, governance, strategic planning, presidential onboarding, mergers, acquisitions, and strategic alliances. Dr. McNaughton’s approach combines a holistic methodology with a deep understanding of the contemporary and evolving challenges facing higher education institutions worldwide to ensure his clients succeed in their mission. Connect with Drumm McNaughton on LinkedIn→…

Changing Higher Ed

1
Keys to Launching New College Programs that Build Enrollment 34:39

28 weeks ago34:39

34:39

Creating new colleges, new college programs, and growing enrollment is not an easy task in our current academic environment. Building enrollment for a brand-new academic program is one of higher education's toughest challenges. Yet, the University of Oklahoma's Polytechnic Institute (UOPI) successfully recruited its first class by flipping the traditional mindset. Instead of expecting students to be "college ready," they designed their programs to be "student ready." In this episode of Changing Higher Ed®, Dr. Teri Reed, inaugural director of the University of Oklahoma Polytechnic Institute at OU Tulsa and veteran creator of innovative engineering education programs, shares insights on launching new academic programs and colleges, revealing how strategic partnerships with Google and local community colleges helped launch new degrees that attract students to high-demand fields like cybersecurity and artificial intelligence. Podcast Overview Industry-Driven Program Design Extensive consultation with industry partners identified skills gaps, particularly in applied technical fields. Curriculum development focused on producing "industry ready" graduates. Programs include cybersecurity, applied artificial intelligence, and software development integration. Industry certifications embedded within courses to enhance graduate employability. Strategic Faculty Recruitment and Structure Innovative group interview process to ensure a collaborative mindset. Faculty hired across disciplines to prevent silos. Over 200 years of combined industry experience among 10 faculty members. Integration of industry professionals as university affiliates (including a current Google employee). Continuous Improvement: Curriculum Agility and Innovation Annual curriculum reviews and updates based on industry feedback. Willingness to modify programs multiple times per year to stay current. Two faculty "owners" per course to encourage collaboration and innovation. Focus on cross-disciplinary integration rather than traditional departmental structures. Strategic Partnerships Close collaboration with local community colleges for seamless transfers. The " Intentional swirling " approach allows students to progress while completing associate degrees. Industry partnerships inform curriculum and provide real-world expertise. Marketing and communication strategies to build program awareness. Creating Programs Focused on Student Success "Student ready" philosophy rather than the traditional "college ready" approach. Emphasis on meeting students where they are academically. Focus on reducing time-to-degree completion. Integration of industry certifications within coursework. Three Takeaways for University Presidents and Boards Listen broadly, especially to stakeholders who don't typically feel heard. Be bold in creating unique programs that differ from traditional approaches. Embrace opportunities in the high-tech world and move quickly to implement changes. Bonus Takeaway from Dr. McNaughton Hire faculty and staff who embrace change and are willing to continuously update curriculum based on industry needs. Wrapping Up This case study of the OU Polytechnic Institute provides valuable insights for higher education leaders looking to develop new programs that build enrollment and meet industry needs while maintaining academic rigor and ensuring student success. #HigherEducation #HigherEdEnrollment #HigherEducationPodcast Read the show transcript on our website: https://changinghighered.com/launching-new-college-programs-that-build-enrollment/ About Our Podcast Guest Teri K. Reed, Ph.D. , is the inaugural director of the OU Polytechnic Institute at OU-Tulsa. An OU alumna, internationally recognized leader in the field of engineering education, and advocate for research-informed approaches to engineering education and administration, Reed has made significant contributions to higher education nationally. She helped establish the scholarly foundation for engineering education as an academic discipline through co-authorship of several landmark 2006 Journal of Engineering Education’s special reports. She serves as an executive board member and fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education, and she is a former president of the Women in Engineering ProActive Network. She is the recipient of many accolades that recognize her teaching and leadership abilities, including two awards from the University of Oklahoma: the Distinguished Service Award from the Mewbourne College of Earth and Energy, and selection as one of the inaugural recipients of the OU Regents’ Alumni Award. Connect with Teri Reed on LinkedIn → About the Host Dr. Drumm McNaughton is the founder, CEO, and Principal Consultant at The Change Leader, Inc . A highly sought-after higher education consultant with 20+ years of experience, Dr. McNaughton works with leadership, management, and boards of U.S. and international institutions. His expertise spans key areas, including accreditation, governance, strategic planning, presidential onboarding, mergers, acquisitions, and strategic alliances. Dr. McNaughton’s approach combines a holistic methodology with a deep understanding of the contemporary and evolving challenges facing higher education institutions worldwide to ensure his clients succeed in their mission. Connect with Drumm McNaughton on LinkedIn→…

Changing Higher Ed

1
How Semester at Sea Improves Student Outcomes and Boosts Institutional Success 36:34

29 weeks ago36:34

36:34

According to the Consortium for Analysis of Student Success through International Education (CASSIE) , students who participate in study abroad programs are 6.2 percentage points more likely to graduate within four years and 3.8 percentage points more likely to graduate within six years compared to their non-study abroad peers. Additionally, these students tend to earn higher GPAs and accumulate more credit hours upon graduation. This University System of Georgia infographic shows these outcomes directly enhance institutional key performance indicators such as retention and persistence. In this episode of Changing Higher Ed® podcast, Dr. Drumm McNaughton interviews Dr. Scott Marshall, President and CEO of the Institute for Shipboard Education, about how Semester at Sea transforms students’ lives and enhances institutional outcomes through innovative study abroad programming. Why Semester at Sea is a Game-Changer Semester at Sea offers students the opportunity to visit up to 10 countries during a single semester while earning 12 to 15 college credits through a partnership with Colorado State University. The program is supported by 180 universities worldwide, attracting a diverse student body of 450 to 550 students per voyage. While onboard the ship, students engage in a robust academic curriculum and participate in a living-learning community. This unique environment fosters strong relationships among peers, faculty, and staff while encouraging deep reflection on cultural experiences gained at each port of call. The program creates a profound impact on students by integrating global learning, critical thinking, and community-building into a single, cohesive experience. Alumni frequently credit Semester at Sea with shaping their careers and life paths, emphasizing how the iterative process of experiencing different cultures followed by reflection can permanently transform mental models and worldviews. The Impact of Study Abroad on Institutional Success The importance of study abroad programs in improving institutional metrics is significant. Research shows that students who study abroad graduate faster, earn higher GPAs, and complete more credit hours than their peers. This results in improved retention rates and better long-term outcomes for universities. Semester at Sea’s unique model of comparative experiential learning sets it apart from traditional study abroad programs, making it an invaluable asset for institutions seeking to enhance student outcomes and global competencies. Semester at Sea Benefits for Universities As a “third-party provider” program, Semester at Sea allows universities to partner without the financial burden of running their own study abroad initiatives. While institutions may lose one semester’s worth of tuition from participating students, the long-term benefits—such as higher retention rates, faster graduation times, and increased alumni loyalty—far outweigh the costs. By investing in study abroad programs, institutions can position themselves as leaders in global education and prepare their students for the challenges of an interconnected world. Innovations for the Future of Study Abroad Programs and Semester at Sea Looking ahead, the program is exploring new ways to remain at the forefront of global education. Plans include creating an artificial intelligence (AI) floating lab, which would allow students to gain AI literacy while participating in the program’s transformative experiential learning model. Collaborating with corporate partners like Nvidia, this initiative aims to equip students with cutting-edge skills that are increasingly critical in today’s job market. The Case for Expanding Study Abroad Destinations While Europe remains a popular destination for study abroad, institutions are encouraged to expand their programs to include Asia, Africa, and other emerging economies. With three of the world’s top five economies located in Asia (Japan, China, and India), exposing students to these regions is essential for preparing them to succeed in a globalized workforce. Semester at Sea’s itineraries reflect this need by offering students a diverse range of cultural and economic contexts to explore. The Importance of Faculty Engagement Faculty play a crucial role in the success of Semester at Sea. Participating faculty members enhance the student experience and bring fresh perspectives and global insights back to their home campuses. This ripple effect benefits future cohorts and strengthens the institution’s academic community. Faculty on Semester at Sea voyages are carefully selected for their passion for teaching and ability to contribute to the program’s unique living-learning environment. What Makes Semester at Sea Unique? Much of the program’s success is attributed to its living-learning community, which fosters deep connections among students, faculty, and staff. Students live and learn together on a ship for 105 days, participating in high-impact practices such as global learning and common intellectual experiences. The program’s structure ensures that students develop intercultural competencies, adaptability, and critical thinking skills that are vital in today’s interconnected world. Three Takeaways for University Presidents and Boards Consider Study Abroad Offices as Revenue Supporters Reframe how study abroad offices are viewed—not as cost centers but as revenue enhancers. These programs drive institutional success by improving retention, graduation rates, and overall student outcomes. Invest in Study Abroad Programs Institutions should provide incentives for students to participate in study abroad, such as financial aid scaled to family contributions. These investments yield significant returns through better institutional KPIs and stronger alumni engagement. Encourage Expansion Beyond Europe Study abroad offices should prioritize robust, comparative programs outside Europe, focusing on emerging economies like Asia and Africa. This approach aligns with global trends and equips students for success in diverse cultural and economic contexts. Bonus Takeaway from Dr. McNaughton: Involve your faculty in study abroad programs. Faculty who participate in programs like Semester at Sea return with enriched perspectives that benefit students and strengthen institutional outcomes. Final Thoughts As higher education leaders face mounting challenges in student retention, persistence, and graduation rates, innovative programs like Semester at Sea offer an intriguing solution. The combination of experiential learning, cultural immersion, and academic rigor provides students with a transformative experience that shapes their futures and strengthens institutional performance. By investing in global education and expanding opportunities beyond traditional boundaries, institutions can prepare students to succeed in an interconnected world while achieving vital organizational objectives. Read the transcript on our website at https://changinghighered.com/semester-at-sea-improves-student-outcomes-and-boosts-institutional-success/ #HigherEducation #StudyAbroad #SemesterAtSea About Our Podcast Guest Scott Marshall is the host of the As Unexpected Podcast and President and CEO of the Institute for Shipboard Education, which directs Semester at Sea, a leading study abroad program. His passion for global education began with a study abroad experience in Japan as an undergraduate. Marshall sailed with his family on Semester at Sea in Spring 2017, later joining the organization as Vice President of Academic Affairs and becoming President in 2020. Previously, he was a Professor of Management and Vice Provost at Portland State University, publishing over 40 works on management, marketing, and entrepreneurship while teaching strategy and international business. He earned a B.A. in Business Economics from Willamette University, an M.A. in International Affairs from George Washington University, and a Ph.D. in International Business from the University of Oregon. His career reflects a lifelong dedication to education, travel, and fostering cross-cultural understanding. About the Host Dr. Drumm McNaughton is the founder, CEO, and Principal Consultant at The Change Leader, Inc . A highly sought-after higher education consultant with 20+ years of experience, Dr. McNaughton works with leadership, management, and boards of U.S. and international institutions. His expertise spans key areas, including accreditation, governance, strategic planning, presidential onboarding, mergers, acquisitions, and strategic alliances. Dr. McNaughton’s approach combines a holistic methodology with a deep understanding of the contemporary and evolving challenges facing higher education institutions worldwide to ensure his clients succeed in their mission.…

Changing Higher Ed

1
Higher Ed Enrollment Crisis—Strategic Solutions and Expert Analysis 44:02

30 weeks ago44:02

44:02

Higher Education Enrollment Decline 2024-2040: You Can’t Recruit Your Way Out of a Declining Market The enrollment cliff is no longer a distant threat—it’s here, and institutions must act decisively to adapt. In this episode of Changing Higher Ed, Dr. Drumm McNaughton hosts Bill Conley and Bob Massa of Enrollment Intelligence Now to explore the demographic shifts, financial realities, and strategic imperatives reshaping higher education. With over 80 years of combined experience from institutions including Johns Hopkins, Bucknell, Dickinson College, and Columbia University, these enrollment experts provide insights into the demographic and enrollment decline. The latest Western Interstate Commission on Higher Education (WICHE) report projects significant declines in high school graduates, signaling major challenges for higher education institutions. After peaking at 3.9 million graduates in 2025, numbers will decline to 3.6 million by 2030 and below 3.4 million by 2040—a 13% drop over 15 years. Five states (California, Illinois, Michigan, New York, and Pennsylvania) will account for over 75% of this nationwide decline. Key Demographic Shifts (2025-2040) White student population: 26% decrease (1.6M to 1.2M) Hispanic student population: 16% increase (940K to 1.1M) Black student population: 22% decrease Asian student population: 10% decrease Growing gender gap: 2025 projection shows 52% female vs. 42% male degree holders Market Segmentation Impact Elite/Selective Institutions (Minimal impact) Institutions with…

Changing Higher Ed

1
Censorship in Higher Education: A PEN America Perspective 33:29

31 weeks ago33:29

33:29

Exploring Academic Censorship and Its Impact on Free Speech in Universities This episode of Changing Higher Ed® podcast features Dr. Jeremy Young of PEN America, discussing the organization's efforts to combat censorship in higher education. PEN America's "Freedom to Learn" program actively opposes state legislative attempts to restrict academic freedom and free speech on college campuses. The interview highlights concerning trends like " educational gag orders ," " jawboning, " and DEI bans in various states , emphasizing the threat these actions pose to intellectual discourse and institutional autonomy. Young advocates for universities to prioritize protecting free expression, even amidst political pressure, suggesting strategic approaches for presidents and boards to navigate these challenges. The discussion also covers PEN America's annual report, " America's Censored Classrooms 2024 ," which tracks these legislative trends. Podcast Overview PEN America's Mission and Background PEN America is a 100-year-old organization focused on defending the freedoms of writers, including academic freedom and freedom of expression. Originally stood for Poets, Essayists, and Novelists but now just "PEN" to be more inclusive of all writers. PEN International has over 140 PEN centers worldwide. PEN America's activities include awards, literary festivals, global writer protection, advocacy against book bans, free speech advocacy, and higher ed advocacy (Freedom to Learn program). PEN America is described as "center-left," maintaining relationships with organizations across the political spectrum. The Threat to Academic Freedom and Free Speech There's a growing movement to constrict the space of ideas available to students on college campuses. The argument often made is that universities lean left, and the solution is to limit existing voices, not to add more conservative perspectives. This trend manifests in attempts to ban courses, curricula, and harass administrators. The "solution to speech is more speech," and increased voices are beneficial. Book Banning and the Underlying Agenda Book banning often involves claims of obscenity but is ultimately an attempt to constrain ideas, not to protect children from inappropriate material. Analysis of banned books reveals they disproportionately feature minoritized identities, including LGBTQ, race, and sexual violence. Those who want to ban these books view them as encouraging those types of identities. PEN believes people need to see themselves reflected in books and that banning them is an attempt to cut off viewpoints for students. "America's Censored Classrooms 2024" Report An annual report tracking legislation that censors colleges and universities. Tracks "educational gag orders" that censor topics/ideas and restrictions on university autonomy (DEI offices, curriculum, accreditation standards, tenure, governance). Focuses on trends in proposed and passed legislation and predictions for the future. Jawboning as a Form of Censorship Jawboning refers to lawmakers threatening or bullying university presidents into actions they want without passing laws. This includes pressuring universities to close DEI offices or eliminate certain programs. It is a stealthy approach as there are no democratic elements, no hearings for public comment, and no laws in place to challenge. It creates a difficult situation for presidents who have limited leverage and no recourse. Congressional hearings on antisemitism have become another form of jawboning intended to intimidate university presidents and make political points. The goal often isn't to address the issue at hand but to exploit them for political gain. Florida as a Case Study in Censorship Florida is cited as "Armageddon for higher education." The state passed the "Stop Woke Act," which is a direct restriction of faculty speech. SB 266 banned DEI and placed significant restrictions on curriculum, causing numerous course eliminations. The University of North Florida removed its interfaith center due to thinking it was a DEI program. The governor replaced the board of New College of Florida with conservative figures who dramatically altered the curriculum and mission. PEN America has opened a permanent office in Florida to respond to these threats. DEI Bans in Higher Education and Their Impacts DEI bans result in the closing of cultural centers, women's centers, and multicultural centers. Staff are often reassigned or laid off in states that pass bans. Iowa has passed the most draconian ban, including a ban on developing any programming "with reference to race." It restricts universities from opining on 16 topics related to race, gender, and identity or any related topics. Universities can't even discuss bias, including the term. Extremist Attacks on Accreditors Project 2025 has a plan to weaponize accreditation , forcing accreditors to remove any reference to DEI. The government is threatening to censor ideas by forcing this change in standards. WASC considered preemptively removing DEI language but backed off after pushback. PEN America is not concerned with DEI standards themselves but with government censorship of those standards. The Impact of Censorship Laws It takes years to reverse censorship laws, even if they are ultimately deemed unconstitutional. Once laws are put into place, universities have to comply until they are challenged. This can lead to the loss of programs, funding, and staff for years. The "Stop Woke Act" was ruled on in four and a half months, which was exceptionally fast. Institutional Neutrality and University Leadership Presidents are scared , and there are laws banning them from commenting on anything. Institutional neutrality is a good principle, but the judgment of what concerns the university's mission must be made internally. The government is inserting its judgment over the judgment of the people who are running the institution. Academic freedom is not possible if the leaders are under the direct ideological thumb of the government. University Presidents' Responses and Strategies: Managing Laws and Defending Ideological Independence Many presidents are doing the wrong thing, unilaterally disarming by preemptively closing DEI programs. It is a strategy that is ineffective when they are dealing with a national campaign, not local lawmakers. Presidents should be prudent about public statements but strategically defend the university's ideological independence. They should embrace cooperation with lawmakers on non-ideological issues (budgets, safety, etc.), but not on controlling ideas. Presidents need to use their limited leverage to protect the independence of the university. Faculty's Role in Protecting Free Speech Universities sometimes fail to share their strategies with faculty and restrict the faculty from expressing viewpoints that could help the institution. Faculty can be more outspoken than institutions, and using the "I'm not speaking for the university" disclaimer can be helpful. Universities should not comment on current events unless they directly affect the institution. Universities should not silence alternative viewpoints. Leaders should avoid inserting themselves in debates where there is no role for them. Free Expression and Institutional Mission Universities must welcome all viewpoints to allow for robust debate. This allows the university to state whether a view aligns with the values of the institution. They must defend the right for all to speak, but they must be able to freely express their own views on the matter. There is no constitutional exception for hate speech, only incitement to violence. Champions of Higher Education PEN America has created the Champions of Higher Education , which is a group of over 300 former college presidents who speak out against these laws and attacks. It is important to protect all kinds of speech on campus, as well as to maintain a safe campus environment. Four Takeaways for University Presidents and Boards "Don't do the censors work for them." "Don't comply in advance." "Promote the values of free expression, no matter what is happening in the country." Train all members of the university community in how free expression works. Final Thoughts Dr. Young's insights highlight the serious and growing threats to academic freedom in the U.S. The interview reveals the complex strategies used by those attempting to censor higher education, the challenges faced by university leaders , and the importance of actively defending free expression. PEN America's work is presented as a crucial effort to protect the fundamental principles of higher education as a place for diverse viewpoints and robust debate. Read the transcript on our website: https://changinghighered.com/censorship-in-higher-education-a-pen-america-perspective/ #HigherEducation #Censorship #Project2025 About Our Guest Jeremy C. Young is the Freedom to Learn Program Director at PEN America, where he leads efforts to fight government censorship in higher education institutions. He directs PEN America’s work on educational gag orders, the Champions of Higher Education initiative, and an expanding network of coalitions to mobilize support for professors and teachers. A former history professor, Young holds a Ph.D. in U.S. history from Indiana University and is the author of The Age of Charisma: Leaders, Followers, and Emotions in American Society, 1870-1940 (Cambridge University Press, 2017). About the Host Dr. Drumm McNaughton is the founder, CEO, and Principal Consultant at The Change Leader, Inc . A highly sought-after higher education consultant with 20+ years of experience, Dr. McNaughton works with leadership, management, and boards of both U.S. and international institutions. His expertise spans key areas, including accreditation, governance, strategic planning, presidential onboarding, mergers, acquisitions, and strategic alliances. Dr. McNaughton’s approach combines a holistic methodology with a deep understanding of the contemporary and evolving challenges facing higher education institutions worldwide to ensure his clients succeed in their mission.…

Changing Higher Ed

1
Higher Education 2025 Predictions and 2024 Year in Review 1:05:32

32 weeks ago1:05:32

1:05:32

In this 7th annual end-of-year episode of the Changing Higher Ed® podcast, Dr. Drumm McNaughton becomes the guest of our podcast as we welcome this year's guest host, Tom Netting, of TEN Government Strategies, to review McNaughton's higher ed predictions for 2024 and explore his higher education 2025 predictions. The discussion reveals how higher education fared over the polarizing election year and what to expect in the coming year. Review of 2024 Higher Ed Predictions and Outcomes Political Environment and Higher Education: Grade A The prediction about increased political involvement in higher education proved remarkably accurate in 2024, particularly given the election year dynamics. The sector experienced unprecedented political scrutiny, culminating in the October 7th congressional hearings that led to the departure of three university presidents. State-level political intervention was particularly evident in Florida, where more than a fifth of University of Florida professors failed post-tenure review under new requirements. A Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) survey of 6,000 faculty members across 55 colleges revealed that one in seven faculty members reported being disciplined or threatened with discipline due to their teaching, research, academic discussions, or off-campus speech. The election year amplified these tensions, with higher education becoming a focal point in political debates. 2024 Enrollment Challenges and Demographics: Grade A The prediction regarding enrollment challenges proved accurate, with institutions facing significant pressures: FAFSA rollout complications created unexpected enrollment barriers Regional institutions and private colleges were particularly affected Institutions under 1,000 students faced the greatest vulnerability Demographic realities showed concerning trends: from 3.4 million students in 2010 to 3.9 million by 2025, with a projected drop back to 3.4 million over the next 15 years. Institutional Closures and Market Consolidation: Grade A The closure rate accelerated dramatically, rising from 50 closures in 2022 to 80 in 2023. In 2024, 16 nonprofits closed, with Christian colleges representing half of these closures. The impact extended beyond campuses - Wells College's closure in Aurora affected the town's elementary school, water treatment plant, and community medical center. Academic realignment became crucial, exemplified by West Virginia University's cuts of 143 faculty positions and 28 programs and PASSHE's consolidation of six universities into two regional entities. As predicted, smaller private institutions became prime targets for acquisition: Institutions under 1,000 enrollment faced greatest pressure Those without strong endowments particularly vulnerable Early movers in seeking partnerships fared better than those waiting until financial crisis Market showing clear signs of mature-to-declining industry characteristics Technology and Artificial Intelligence Adoption: Grade A- The sector showed a clear divide in AI adoption approaches: Miami Dade College and Kogod Business School fully integrated AI across curricula Other institutions maintained strict opposition to AI-generated content Faculty concerns about AI replacing jobs emerged at institutions like University of Wisconsin Progressive institutions recognized AI's potential in enrollment management, student outcomes measurement, and program assessment Student Needs and Pandemic Recovery: A- Post-pandemic adaptation revealed mixed results: Successful intense tutoring programs demonstrated three to four months of focused support could gain students a year in academic progress Faculty resistance to changing traditional teaching methods remained stronger than anticipated Growing sense of student and faculty disengagement emerged Increased burden on faculty as informal student counselors Shift toward more transactional educational relationships Higher Education 2025 Predictions Legislative and Regulatory Environment Higher Education Act Reform Partial reform through budget reconciliation rather than comprehensive overhaul Implementation of short-term Pell Grants with bipartisan support Department of Education reorganization likely but not dissolution Enhanced focus on workforce development while maintaining liberal arts values Regulatory Changes Significant modifications to existing regulations under new administration Major changes to accreditation oversight through legislation Evolution of NACIQI's role and authority Enhanced institutional accountability measures Challenges to regulatory authority through cases like Loper Bright Market Evolution and Institutional Viability Enrollment and Demographics One-time enrollment increase in early 2025 due to FAFSA resolution Subsequent decline as demographic cliff impacts materialize Uncertainty in international student enrollment due to immigration policies Critical need for innovative recruitment strategies Expansion of direct admission programs Institutional Sustainability Accelerated pace of closures and mergers Increased pressure on institutions under 1,000 enrollment Four strategic options: acquire, sell, consolidate, or close Enhanced focus on mission-critical programs Need for proactive partnership exploration while financially viable Academic and Administrative Transformation Campus Climate and Governance Continued pressure on DEI initiatives with more institutions modifying policies Persistent free speech challenges requiring balanced approaches Enhanced board engagement beyond traditional meeting schedules Evolution of shared governance models Balance between oversight and operational support Technology Integration Required AI adoption across operations Integration of AI into teaching and administrative functions Need for systematic faculty development in technology Balance between innovation and academic integrity Enhanced focus on critical thinking in AI use Financial Sustainability Limited progress on broad student debt forgiveness Focus on program cost-benefit analysis Innovation in financial aid delivery Growing emphasis on affordability initiatives Enhanced scrutiny of return on investment Strategic Imperatives for Leadership Proactive Planning and Adaptation Institutions must: Develop comprehensive contingency plans for enrollment fluctuations Create distinctive value propositions Implement effective academic realignment strategies Balance workforce needs with educational mission Consider strategic partnerships before financial pressure becomes acute Governance and Leadership Evolution Boards must: Increase engagement frequency Maintain appropriate oversight without micromanagement Consider institutional sustainability options proactively Support presidents in navigating complex challenges Ensure alignment between mission and market realities Focus on student success and community impact Wrapping Up McNaughton's 2025 Higher Ed Predictions The higher education landscape stands at a critical juncture where decisions made in 2025 will determine institutional trajectories for years to come. Success requires balancing traditional academic values with market realities while maintaining focus on student success and institutional sustainability. The sector must embrace transformation while preserving core educational missions, requiring unprecedented levels of strategic thinking and proactive leadership. The demographic cliff, political challenges, technological change, and market evolution demand a new approach to higher education leadership. Institutions that survive and thrive will be those that can adapt to changing conditions while preserving their essential character and mission. The time for proactive strategic planning and decisive action is now, before external pressures force reactive responses. Read the transcript on our website at https://changinghighered.com/higher-education-2025-predictions-2024-year-in-review/ #Highereducation #2025HigherEdPredictions #HigherEducationPodcast About Our Podcast Guest Host Tom Netting Having spent all of his professional career devoted to higher education policy oversight and implementation, Tom Netting has an extensive knowledge of the laws and regulations governing all aspects of higher education. His considerable background and experience have afforded him the opportunity to view the development and implementation of federal higher education and workforce development policy in their entirety – including issues related to higher education and workforce development, health care, veteran affairs policies, and the procurement of federal appropriations. About the Co-Host Dr. Drumm McNaughton is the founder, CEO, and Principal Consultant at The Change Leader, Inc . A highly sought-after higher education consultant with 20+ years of experience, Dr. McNaughton works with leadership, management, and boards of both U.S. and international institutions. His expertise spans key areas, including accreditation, governance, strategic planning, presidential onboarding, mergers, acquisitions, and strategic alliances. Dr. McNaughton’s approach combines a holistic methodology with a deep understanding of the contemporary and evolving challenges facing higher education institutions worldwide to ensure his clients succeed in their mission.…

Changing Higher Ed

1
New Models for Consolidation in Higher Education 34:42

33 weeks ago34:42

34:42

Consolidating Higher Education: The Community Solution Model This episode of the Changing Higher Ed® podcast features Dr. Michael Horowitz, Chancellor of The Community Solution Education System ( formerly TCS Education System ), who discusses using innovative models for higher education consolidation as an additional category in or alternative to traditional mergers or acquisitions . Horowitz highlights the system's unique approach, a collaborative model prioritizing resource optimization and expertise sharing among member institutions while maintaining individual identities. The conversation addresses challenges facing higher education , including increasing closure rates and the importance of proactive strategies like mergers, acquisitions, and consolidations. Both McNaughton and Horowitz emphasize the necessity of early planning and shared vision, particularly involving faculty, for successful integration . They also touch on broader trends and challenges in higher education, such as increasing closures and the challenges boards face in adapting to the uniqueness of the business of higher education. They conclude with practical advice for institutions considering consolidation, focusing on partnership development, early financial assessment, and resource amplification to strengthen academic missions. Key Discussion Points The Community Solution Model: A Collaborative System Alternative to Traditional M&A: The Community Solution operates as a "system" where institutions collaborate rather than compete. This approach aims to optimize resources, share expertise, and improve student success. Quote: "The consolidation that operates as a system in which its institutions collaborate instead of competing, gain resources, share expertise, and optimize expenditures in the process." – Michael Horowitz System Integration: The system model integrates non-student facing operations like finance, technology, and marketing. This allows individual institutions to focus on academic endeavors. Quote: "All of that can be scaled. To better quality, for the same dollar... The uniqueness has to drive through the academics."– Michael Horowitz Maintaining Institutional Identity: Each college within the system retains its own accreditation, president, board, leadership, assets, and liabilities. The system consolidates operations, not the institutions themselves. Quote: "…each of our colleges keeps its own accreditation, president, board, leadership, their own assets and liabilities." – Michael Horowitz Trends in Higher Education and the Need for Consolidation Increasing Closures: The concerning trend of college closures, which have a significant negative impact on students and communities. Clayton Christensen's prediction of closures is revisited and said to be possibly understated. Quote: " The closure rate is accelerating. Last year there were 80 closures total, including 16 nonprofits." – Drumm McNaughton Mature and Declining Market: The higher education market is described as mature with overcapacity and declining student populations. The need for a new strategy to remain viable is clear. Boards Waiting Too Long : Many college boards are hesitant to act proactively and address financial or enrollment trends until it is too late. Relying on 'hope' is not an effective strategy. AI Prediction: AI models could accurately predict most college closures based on historical data, showing that many of these closures are foreseeable. The Benefits of a System Approach Resource Amplification: Consolidation of back-end services leads to cost savings that can be reinvested into academic programs. The system aims to "amplify" resources, not just save money. Scalability and Efficiency: Shared resources and centralized functions create economies of scale and improve overall efficiency. Shared Talent and Ideas: The system fosters collaboration and the sharing of best practices among institutions and staff, resulting in shared knowledge. Quote: "...we're amplifying our brain power by coming together." – Michael Horowitz Enhanced Faculty and Student Resources: The system provides faculty with resources like teaching and learning support and global engagement programs. Implementation and Integration Challenges Regulatory Process: Post-merger integration involves navigating a complex regulatory process that requires meticulous planning and execution and can take an extended amount of time. Project Management: Successful integration requires strong project management skills to coordinate the various tasks and stages. “The most valuable person that you have on your post-merger integration team is your project manager." – Dr. Drumm McNaughton. Faculty Buy-In: Obtaining faculty support and ensuring clear communication are crucial for a successful transition. Timeline: The process from initial discussion to full integration can be lengthy and can take up to three years. Consolidation Governance Structure Dual Board Structure: Each college retains its own board, which is deeply involved with the day-to-day operations, while a system board oversees the overall system mission, risk, and financial health. System Board Role: The system board provides guidance and support but does not interfere with the day-to-day operations of the colleges. This board looks at how the system works together. Shared Governance : Overlap between the two board structures allows for a shared understanding of institutional goals and needs. Future Plans at The Community Solution (TCS) New Facility in Chicago: The Community Solution is consolidating its system office and Chicago school into a new facility to increase collaboration and efficiency. This includes plans for a second medical school. Canadian Recruitment: The system is planning to establish a presence in Vancouver, Canada, to recruit more international students without needing to create duplicative offices. Global Perspective: The system sees the importance of global education and perspective in higher ed. Three Takeaways for Institution Presidents and Boards Considering Consolidation Seek Partnerships: Proactively explore potential collaborations with other colleges, universities, or community entities. Act Early & Study Financials: Have these conversations early, don't wait until urgency arises, and be very aware of financial and enrollment trends. Amplify Resources: Focus on amplifying resources through collaboration to strengthen both the academic mission and community impact. Wrapping Up This podcast provides valuable insights into an alternative model for higher education consolidation that prioritizes collaboration, resource optimization, and the preservation of institutional identity. The Community Solution's approach serves as an example for other institutions facing challenges in a changing higher education landscape. The conversation highlights the necessity of proactive decision-making and strategic planning. Read the transcript on our website at https://changinghighered.com/new-models-for-consolidation-in-higher-education/ #HigherEducation #HigherEducationConsolidation #HigherEducationPodcast About Our Podcast Guest Michael Horowitz , Ph.D., is the founder and president of The Community Solution Education System, an integrated, nonprofit system of six colleges and universities that work collaboratively to increase student success and enhance community impact. Prior to founding The Community Solution, he served as president of The Chicago School for nearly a decade. Dr. Horowitz has more than 30 years of experience in higher education roles that include faculty member, program director, and dean. He holds a Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology from Northwestern University and a B.A. in Psychology from Columbia University. Connect with Michael Horowitz on LinkedIn → About the Host Dr. Drumm McNaughton is the founder, CEO, and Principal Consultant at The Change Leader, Inc . A highly sought-after higher education consultant with 20+ years of experience, Dr. McNaughton works with leadership, management, and boards of both U.S. and international institutions. His expertise spans key areas, including accreditation, governance, strategic planning, presidential onboarding, mergers, acquisitions, and strategic alliances. Dr. McNaughton’s approach combines a holistic methodology with a deep understanding of the contemporary and evolving challenges facing higher education institutions worldwide to ensure his clients succeed in their mission.…

Changing Higher Ed

1
Washington Update: Implications of the 2024 Elections on Higher Ed — Part 2 35:17

34 weeks ago35:17

35:17

Higher Education Policy in the 119th Congress Part 2 of this podcast continues with Tom Netting, president of TEN Government Strategies and our Washington Update expert , examining ways in which the outcome of the 2024 US elections will transform higher education. Drawing from over three decades of policy expertise, Netting provides an insider’s perspective on the anticipated changes a Trump administration and the 119th Republican-controlled Congress could bring to higher education. Netting analyzes shifts in key Congressional committees, focusing on the implications for higher education funding, accreditation, and the reauthorization of the Higher Education Act. He also addresses the impact of potential regulatory changes, executive orders, and court decisions on issues such as student loan repayment and Title IX. Finally, he offers advice to higher education institutions on preparing for these upcoming changes. Higher Education Policy in the 119th Congress: 2024-2025 Impact Analysis Tom Netting, president of TEN Government Strategies and Washington Update expert, provides crucial insights into how the 2024 US elections will transform higher education. Drawing from over three decades of policy expertise, Netting offers an insider’s perspective on the anticipated changes under a Trump administration and Republican-controlled 119th Congress, exploring implications for institutions, students, and education policy. Congressional Leadership Transformation and Committee Impact Critical Committee Changes Reshaping Education Policy Senate HELP Committee leadership transition to Bill Cassidy (R-LA) from Bernie Sanders (D-VT), signaling a potential pivot toward healthcare-focused policy and reformed higher education priorities. House Education and Workforce Committee leadership race between Joe Wilson (R-SC), Tim Wahlberg (R-MI), and Burgess Owens (R-UT), following Virginia Foxx’s retirement, with implications for education policy direction. Significant Appropriations Committee turnover affecting crucial decisions on: Pell Grant funding allocations Student loan program resources Financial aid program sustainability Institution support mechanisms Regulatory Transformation Immediate Regulatory Changes and Their Institutional Impact Comprehensive revision of existing regulations: Borrower defense mechanisms and institutional accountability Updated gainful employment metrics affecting program viability Modified 90/10 rule implementation for proprietary institutions Reformed institutional quality standards Status of proposed rules and NPRMs: Student borrower relief programs Program Integrity and Institutional Quality guidelines TRIO program modifications Distance education requirements Return to Title IV (R2T4) calculations Delayed or abandoned 2025 initiatives: Cash management reforms Accreditation standard updates State authorization requirements Executive Action Implications Immigration policy changes affecting: International student enrollment Institutional revenue streams Campus diversity initiatives Title IX implementation challenges: 26 states blocking new regulations 24 states implementing changes Institutional compliance complexities Student loan repayment modifications: New repayment structure implementation Institutional reporting requirements Student success metrics Accreditation Evolution and Institutional Impact Fundamental Accreditation Reform Reexamination of accreditor core mission and scope Controversial DEI standards debate: Five of six former regional accreditors requiring DEI standards SACCOC’s contrasting approach Potential prohibition implications Academic freedom considerations: Faculty concerns about restricted discourse Institutional autonomy questions Cultural and political influence on standards Higher Education Act reauthorization implications: Potential solutions for accreditation challenges Updated oversight mechanisms Reformed quality assurance frameworks Liberal Arts Education Transformation Innovation and Adaptation in Liberal Education Strategic evolution of traditional programs: Career pathway integration Skills-based learning incorporation Industry alignment strategies Public service value recognition: Loan forgiveness program preservation Community impact assessment Social value metrics Educational delivery modernization: Hybrid learning models Virtual education integration Technology-enhanced instruction AI integration strategies: Curriculum enhancement Administrative efficiency Student support systems Three Key Takeaways for Higher Education Leaders Stay tuned for leadership changes. The new leadership will set the tone and tenor for upcoming policy changes, and a lot of the direction will come from the new President-Elect. Be prepared for discussions around accreditation and outcomes. There will be considerable discussion around accreditation and outcomes, as well as how the return on investment for all of education is assessed. Institutions should prepare to discuss outcome measures and how to demonstrate their return on investment, regardless of what type of institution they are. Be aware of the upcoming student loan repayment process. All of Congress is aware that student loan repayments are going to become due, and the process that is undertaken by both Congress and the new incoming administration will be a major topic of discussion in 2025. #HigherEducation #HigherEdPolicy #WashingtonUpdate Read the transcript on our website at https://changinghighered.com/washington-update-implications-of-2024-elections-on-higher-ed-part-2/ About Our Podcast Guest Tom Netting Having spent all of his professional career devoted to higher education policy oversight and implementation, Tom Netting has an extensive knowledge of the laws and regulations governing all aspects of higher education. His considerable background and experience have afforded him the opportunity to view the development and implementation of federal higher education and workforce development policy in their entirety – including issues related to higher education and workforce development, health care, veteran affairs policies, and the procurement of federal appropriations. About the Host Dr. Drumm McNaughton is the founder, CEO, and Principal Consultant at The Change Leader, Inc . A highly sought-after higher education consultant with 20+ years of experience, Dr. McNaughton works with leadership, management, and boards of both U.S. and international institutions. His expertise spans key areas, including accreditation, governance, strategic planning, presidential onboarding, mergers, acquisitions, and strategic alliances. Dr. McNaughton’s approach combines a holistic methodology with a deep understanding of the contemporary and evolving challenges facing higher education institutions worldwide to ensure his clients succeed in their mission.…

Changing Higher Ed

1
Washington Update: Implications of the 2024 Elections on Higher Ed — Part 1 28:48

35 weeks ago28:48

28:48

Higher Education Expert Analysis of Anticipated Federal Policy Changes Under the Incoming Administration Part 1 of this two-part podcast welcomes back Tom Netting, president of TEN Government Strategies and our Washington Update expert, to examine how the 2024 US elections will transform higher education. Drawing from over three decades of policy expertise on The Hill, Netting provides an insider's perspective on the anticipated changes a Trump administration and Republican Congress could bring to higher education. The conversation unpacks major shifts within the Department of Education, from FAFSA modernization and Title IX overhaul to the future of student loan repayment. Netting addresses pressing questions about federal funding streams, potential departmental restructuring, and the impact of new IT security regulations. The discussion culminates in a penetrating analysis of how evolving ROI metrics could fundamentally alter higher education funding decisions. Overview What Higher Education Leaders Will Gain from Listening to This Podcast Higher Education Implications of the 2024 Election – Part 1 The incoming presidential administration is expected to bring significant changes to the Department of Education, moving much faster than it did in the previous administration. Key personnel appointments are being announced quickly and are comprised of a more seasoned team. Netting doesn’t believe the Department of Education will be abolished but expects significant changes in how it is run, particularly with Linda McMahon as the nominee for Secretary of Education. Her background suggests the Department will be run more like a business with an emphasis on fiscal responsibility. Higher education leaders should be prepared to embrace potential changes, some of which might be positive. For example, the administration is expected to address the challenges with the FAFSA form and the administration of student financial aid, issues that have led to a decline in applications. Federal Higher Education Reform: Key Policy Changes for 2025 Key areas of change within the Department of Education likely include: Title IX: The current Title IX regulations are facing legal challenges, with 26 states blockading the regulations as put forward and 24 states trying to implement them in the new iteration, which is causing chaos for institutions. The new administration may revisit these regulations. Gainful Employment and Financial Value Transparency Regulations: All institutions, not just proprietary or those subject to loss of eligibility, are supposed to submit information on all of their student cohorts to the Department of Education by January 15th . These regulations, requiring institutions to submit data on student cohorts and completers lists, are facing scrutiny and potential revision under the new administration. Income-Contingent Based Repayment Plans: The administration will need to address the upcoming deadline for student loan repayments and may revise existing income-driven repayment plans. Netting succinctly explains the difference in opinion between Republicans and Democrats on student loan repayment. Return on Investment (ROI) in Higher Education: The new administration is likely to focus on the ROI of higher education , potentially using a calculation similar to the one used for “exemplary institutions” under the previous administration. This could lead to an assessment of ROI across all sectors of higher education and influence funding decisions. The major difference, however, is that this new equation methodology recognizes a 10-year window, not a 3-year window of earnings potential. Three Key Takeaways for Higher Education Leaders Engage with Policymakers: Actively engaging with policymakers at both the state and federal levels. This involves understanding their priorities, building relationships, and advocating for policies that support higher education. Prioritize Cybersecurity: The increasing focus on cybersecurity, particularly the NIST 800-171 regulations, makes cybersecurity a top priority. This includes investing in necessary infrastructure and personnel to ensure compliance and protect sensitive data. Focus on Workforce Development: Place a high priority on workforce development and the need for higher education institutions to align their programs with the needs of the economy. This includes forging partnerships with businesses and industries to provide relevant training and ensure graduates are well-prepared for the workforce. Higher Education Policy Outlook 2025 Overall, it is recommended higher education anticipate a period of significant change under the new administration. Leaders should stay informed about policy developments, particularly those related to the issues listed above, and be prepared to adapt to a new regulatory environment. Join us next week for Part 2 of this Washington Update with Tom Netting on anticipated changes coming in 2025 with the new administration. Read the transcript on our website at https://changinghighered.com/washington-update-implications-of-the-2024-elections-on-higher-ed-part-1/ #HigherEducation #WashingtonUpdate #HigherEdPolicy About Our Podcast Guest Tom Netting Having spent all of his professional career devoted to higher education policy oversight and implementation, Tom Netting has an extensive knowledge of the laws and regulations governing all aspects of higher education. His considerable background and experience have afforded him the opportunity to view the development and implementation of federal higher education and workforce development policy in their entirety – including issues related to higher education and workforce development, health care, veteran affairs policies, and the procurement of federal appropriations. About the Host Dr. Drumm McNaughton is the founder, CEO, and Principal Consultant at The Change Leader, Inc . A highly sought-after higher education consultant with 20+ years of experience, Dr. McNaughton works with leadership, management, and boards of both U.S. and international institutions. His expertise spans key areas, including accreditation, governance, strategic planning, presidential onboarding, mergers, acquisitions, and strategic alliances. Dr. McNaughton’s approach combines a holistic methodology with a deep understanding of the contemporary and evolving challenges facing higher education institutions worldwide to ensure his clients succeed in their mission.…

Changing Higher Ed

1
How Faculty Diversity Drives Enrollment: The PhD Project’s 90% Success Model 38:42

36 weeks ago38:42

38:42

Faculty Diversity: A Business Case for Higher Education Success When the PhD Project launched in 1994, you could count the number of diverse students at major business school recruiting events on one hand. Today, after 30 years of systemic change, the initiative has graduated over 1,700 faculty members of color with an extraordinary 90% completion rate – nearly double the national average for doctoral programs. Even more remarkable, 97% of these graduates stay in academia. But here’s what makes this story particularly compelling for university leaders: Research has shown that the presence of a diverse faculty is the second highest correlating factor (after state demographics) in attracting diverse students to universities. It’s not just about representation – it’s about institutional success and survival in an increasingly global economy. This episode of Changing Higher Ed® features Dr. Jeffrey Robinson, Graduate of the PhD Project, Interim Chancellor at Rutgers University, Newark, and Blane Ruschak, President of the PhD Project and Consultant with KPMG. The PhD Project is a 30-year-old initiative focused on increasing diversity in business school faculty. The podcast highlights the project’s impact on diversifying the talent pipeline by providing mentorship and support to underrepresented students pursuing PhDs in business. Robinson and Ruschak share their personal experiences and explain the project’s systemic approach to change, emphasizing the economic benefits of a diverse workforce alongside recruiting, retaining, and supporting diverse faculty. Key Discussion Points: The Origins and Mission of the PhD Project: Founded nearly 30 years ago to address the lack of diversity in business schools and the workforce. Aims to increase the number of underrepresented minority faculty in business schools, which in turn attracts more diverse students to the field. Driven by the recognition of a changing global business environment and the demand for a diverse workforce. How the PhD Project Works: Sponsors an annual conference for underrepresented minority students to learn about business PhD programs. Provides financial support, networking opportunities, and mentorship to students throughout their doctoral journey. Boasts a 90% completion rate for its participants, with 97% staying in academia. Continues to support graduates through developmental programs focused on teaching, research, and leadership. The Benefits of Faculty Diversity in Academia: Diverse faculty serve as role models for students, especially those from underrepresented backgrounds. They bring different lived experiences, perspectives, and connections to the classroom, enriching the learning environment for all students. Contributes to groundbreaking research and innovative solutions. The Economic Imperative for Diversity: Diverse workforces are better equipped to relate to a wider range of clients and customers. Companies benefit from the diverse perspectives and talents of their employees. The Role of Mentorship and Community: The PhD Project creates a strong support network for participants, helping them navigate the challenges of doctoral studies. Alumni continue to mentor and collaborate with each other, further strengthening the community. Challenges and Solutions in Diversity Recruitment: Retaining diverse faculty is crucial and requires universities to provide adequate support and protect them from excessive service demands. Universities must hold leaders accountable for diversity recruitment goals. Three Takeaways for University Presidents and Boards Invest in recruiting and retaining diverse faculty, recognizing the long-term benefits of attracting and educating a diverse student body. Provide necessary support and mentorship to diverse faculty, ensuring their success and protecting them from being overburdened with diversity-related tasks. Hold university leaders accountable for achieving diversity goals and creating an inclusive campus environment. Final Thoughts The PhD Project is a powerful example of how a focused effort can make a significant impact on diversifying higher education and the workforce. Its success lies in its comprehensive approach, which combines financial support, mentorship, and community building. Read the transcript on our website at https://changinghighered.com/faculty-diversity-drives-enrollment-the-phd-project/ #HigherEducation #HigherEdPodcast #HigherEdDiversity About Our Guests Dr. Jeffrey Robinson is an award-winning author and the Prudential Chair in Business at Rutgers Business School, currently serving as Interim Chancellor of Rutgers University – Newark following two years as Executive Vice Chancellor and Provost. His research focuses on the intersection of business and society, addressing community and economic development in urban areas in the United States and abroad. Through academic leadership and community-engaged scholarship, he has a direct impact on corporate workplaces, entrepreneurs, and economic development policy in New Jersey and beyond. He has conducted groundbreaking studies on African American women entrepreneurs, social innovation, and minority representation in technology entrepreneurship. His recent book “Black Faces in High Places,” co-authored with Dr. Randal Pinkett, won a Gold Medal Axiom Book Award. An accomplished scholar with five degrees spanning engineering, urban studies, and business, Dr. Robinson has delivered keynote speeches and presentations across six continents during his distinguished 25-year academic career. Connect with Jeffrey Robinson on LinkedIn → Blane Ruschak serves as the President of The PhD Project, where he oversees the strategy and operations of The PhD Project, which is a program designed to create more diverse business leaders by supporting diverse professionals to get their PhD in business and become role models in the classroom, academic administration and academic leadership positions. He lives in Charleston, South Carolina, and works out of Montvale, New Jersey. Connect with Blane Ruschak on LinkedIn → About the Host Dr. Drumm McNaughton is Principal Consultant and CEO of The Change Leader, Inc. —a highly sought-after higher education consultant with 20+ years of experience. Dr. McNaughton works with leadership, management, and boards of both U.S. and international institutions. His expertise spans key areas, including accreditation, governance, strategic planning , presidential onboarding, mergers, acquisitions, and strategic alliances. Dr. McNaughton’s approach combines a holistic methodology with a deep understanding of the contemporary and evolving challenges facing higher education institutions worldwide to ensure his clients succeed in their mission. Connect with Drumm McNaughton on LinkedIn →…

Changing Higher Ed

1
Understanding the Crisis of Confidence in Higher Education 34:17

37 weeks ago34:17

34:17

The Declining Trend in Public Confidence Higher Education has a reputation crisis. Public confidence in higher education is declining dramatically. In 2015, a Gallup poll revealed that the vast majority of Americans expressed a great deal of confidence in higher education, with only 10% reporting little to no confidence. By 2024, public confidence shifted significantly: only about a third maintained a great deal of confidence, while a startling 33% now held little to no confidence. This mirrors a broader trend of declining trust in American institutions. Dr. Drumm McNaughton and Dr. Courtney Brown, Vice President of Impact and Planning for the Lumina Foundation, discuss the causes and solutions to declining public confidence in higher education. They also explore the evolving demographics of higher education students, with a significant portion being non-traditional learners balancing work, family, and education. Finally, the conversation proposes solutions, emphasizing the need for increased transparency, improved student support services, and a reevaluation of faculty roles to better meet the needs of today's students. Key Points Covered in This Podcast: Reasons for Declining Confidence in Higher Education The latest Lumina-Gallup study on public confidence in higher education identifies three primary drivers: Political bias: 41% of respondents lacking confidence cited concerns that colleges are too liberal, attempting to indoctrinate students. Lack of relevant skills: Over a third criticized higher education for failing to impart skills directly applicable to the workforce, leaving graduates struggling to find employment. Affordability: Just under 30% expressed concern about rising tuition costs and high debt levels. Shifting Demographics and Needs Traditional student demographics no longer represent the majority. Over a third of students are over 25. Over half are students of color. 78% work, with a third employed full-time. 20% have dependents. 44% are financially independent. Solving the Higher Ed Confidence Crisis: A Call for Change Higher education institutions need to adapt to the changing demographics and address the concerns driving declining confidence and reputation while discerning temporary spin from the true concerns of students and the underlying issues. The Stop-Out Numbers Over 42 million Americans started college but, for various reasons, did not finish. This suggests systemic issues within higher education that need to be addressed to better serve students. Confidence Gap While 54% of Americans hold post-secondary credentials, 33% have little or no confidence in higher education. This suggests a disconnect between the perceived value of education and the experiences of many degree holders. Value and Transparency Despite the concerns, over 90% of respondents still believe that at least one post-secondary credential has value, but trust in the system’s ability to deliver is low. 75% believe a college degree is as important or more important today than it was 20 years ago. Transparency in costs and the career value of degrees is a high priority to restoring trust. There is a need for greater transparency regarding both the true cost of college and the career pathways associated with specific credentials. Workforce Alignment Public concerns about graduates lacking job-ready skills highlight the need for stronger connections between institutions and industries. Partnerships for internships, externships, and mentorships should be prioritized. Partisan Divide Republicans primarily cite political bias as the reason for their declining confidence, while Democrats focus on affordability. The Demographic Cliff The number of high school graduates is projected to decline sharply in 2025-26, forcing institutions to re-evaluate their business models and focus on attracting and serving adult learners. Key Takeaways for Higher Ed Presidents, Boards, and Executive Leaders Listen: Actively engage with current, former, and potential students to understand their needs and experiences. Adapt: Re-evaluate institutional structures, offerings, and support services to better serve today's diverse student population. Increase Transparency: Provide clear and accessible information about costs and career pathways. Rethink Faculty Roles: Value and reward teaching, mentorship, and community engagement alongside research. Embrace Partnerships: Collaborate with employers to offer relevant work-based learning opportunities and build stronger connections to local workforce needs. Final Thoughts The declining confidence in higher education presents a significant challenge, but it also creates an opportunity for transformation. By listening to student needs, adapting to evolving demographics, and prioritizing transparency and relevancy, institutions can rebuild trust and ensure that higher education remains a valuable pathway to opportunity for all. Last week's podcast with Sophie Nguyen and Kevin Carey with New America discussed their research on what Americans really think about higher ed , which looks at the public confidence and perception crisis from a different angle. #HigherEducation #HigherEdPodcast #ValueOfHigherEd Read the transcript on our website: https://changinghighered.com/the-crisis-of-confidence-in-higher-education/ About Our Guest Dr. Courtney Brown is the Vice President of Strategic Impact and Planning at Lumina Foundation , the nation’s largest private foundation focused specifically on increasing Americans’ postsecondary success. As the Foundation’s chief data and research officer, Brown oversees the Foundation’s efforts in the areas of strategic planning, research, evaluation, data, and learning. She also leads Lumina’s international engagement efforts. Brown has decades of experience and is a frequent national speaker and writer on postsecondary data, evaluation, performance measurement, and strategic planning. Dr. Brown received her B.A. from James Madison University and M.A. and Ph.D. from the University of Virginia. Courtney Brown on LinkedIn → About the Host Dr. Drumm McNaughton is Principal Consultant and CEO of The Change Leader, Inc. —a highly sought-after higher education consultant with 20+ years of experience. Dr. McNaughton works with leadership, management, and boards of both U.S. and international institutions. His expertise spans key areas, including accreditation, governance, strategic planning , presidential onboarding, mergers, acquisitions, and strategic alliances. Dr. McNaughton’s approach combines a holistic methodology with a deep understanding of the contemporary and evolving challenges facing higher education institutions worldwide to ensure his clients succeed in their mission. Connect with Drumm McNaughton on LinkedIn →…

Changing Higher Ed

1
What Americans Really Think of Higher Ed: Insights from New America's Varying Degrees 2024 35:18

38 weeks ago35:18

35:18

Despite media narratives of declining confidence in higher education, new survey data reveals 80% of Americans view college costs - not value - as the primary barrier to enrollment. While only 36% think higher education is "fine how it is," bipartisan support remains strong, with a majority of both Democrats and Republicans favoring increased government funding for affordability. On this episode of Changing Higher Ed® podcast, Dr. Drumm McNaughton speaks with Kevin Carey, Vice President for Education and Work at New America, and Sophie Nguyen, Senior Policy Manager with the Higher Education team at New America, a nonpartisan think tank focused on social and technological issues, including education. The discussion centers around New America’s annual “Varying Degrees” survey , which examines how Americans perceive higher education. Carey and Nguyen argue that, contrary to the media narrative, Americans have not actually lost faith in the value of higher education. They attribute the decline in enrollment not to a loss of confidence but rather to demographic shifts, the economic recession, and the unique nature of the pandemic. They also highlight the partisan divide in perspectives on higher education, noting that Republicans have become more skeptical of higher education than Democrats, likely due to a changing composition of the two parties' constituencies in terms of educational attainment. The conversation concludes with practical advice for college leaders on navigating these challenges, emphasizing the need for clear communication about the value of higher education, acknowledging student and parental concerns about affordability and career pathways, and continuing to advocate for higher education in the face of political and social shifts. What Higher Ed Leaders Will Gain From This Podcast Here are some insights, facts, and trends you’ll hear discussed: Americans do not hate higher education. While confidence in higher education as an institution is declining, this is consistent with declining American confidence in all institutions. Americans still largely believe in higher education. Americans’ opinions on higher education have remained relatively stable over the years, even amidst significant events like the pandemic. This finding counters media narratives suggesting a dramatic shift in public opinion. A majority of Republicans believe that the government should invest more money to make higher education more affordable. This suggests that there is a bipartisan consensus on investing in higher education. There has been a partisan realignment around higher education, with Democrats increasingly becoming the party of education. This is likely due to an increase in the number of people with college degrees among Democrat voters. The decline in college enrollment is mainly driven by demographic decline, not by a decline in demand for higher education. The number of college-age people in America peaked in the late 2010s and has been declining since. The pandemic recession did not lead to an increase in college enrollment as previous recessions have. This is because the pandemic recession was brief, and the economy quickly rebounded. The labor market has been very strong for non-college graduates in the middle and lower parts of the wage scale. This may be a factor in the decline in college enrollment. Many parents who say they do not want their children to get a four-year degree actually do want their children to go to college for job training. They may not realize that most job-related training in the United States happens at colleges. Colleges need to communicate the value of a liberal arts education to students and parents. Emphasize that a liberal arts education is not just about job training but also about developing critical thinking skills, exposure to diverse perspectives, and personal growth. Colleges need to make a clear connection between a liberal arts education and career pathways. Highlight how the skills and knowledge gained in a liberal arts education can be applied to various careers. Cost remains a significant concern for a vast majority of Americans, serving as a major barrier to college enrollment. The survey demonstrates bipartisan agreement on this issue. Colleges need to address the cost of higher education: This includes providing more financial aid, lowering tuition, and exploring alternative models of education, such as three-year degrees. Three Key Takeaways for Presidents, Enrollment Executives, and Boards Communicate Education's Value Demonstrate the lifelong benefits of liberal education Make concrete connections between liberal education and career pathways Don't ignore students' desire for clear career outcomes Address Cost Concerns Acknowledge that cost is a significant concern for students Clearly communicate available financial options and solutions Help students understand ways to manage educational costs Embrace Public Support Americans maintain strong support for higher education The majority of both parties support increased government investment Demographics present challenges, but core support remains strong Institutions should acknowledge the need for change while maintaining confidence Final Thoughts The survey responses suggest that higher education leaders must adapt to the real environment, not the selective representation filtered through political or media bias. They need to be aware of the partisan divide around higher education, the demographic decline, and the strong labor market for non-college graduates. They also need to be proactive in communicating the value of higher education to students and parents and in addressing the cost of higher education. Read the transcript on our website at https://changinghighered.com/what-americans-really-think-of-higher-ed-new-americas-varying-degrees-2024/ #VaryingDegrees2024 #HigherEducation #HigherEdPodcast About Our Podcast Guests Sophie Nguyen Sophie Nguyen is a senior policy manager with the higher education team at New America. Her work focuses on college completion and public opinion in higher education. Nguyen leads Varying Degrees, New America’s annual survey that looks into how Americans perceive important higher education issues regarding value, funding, and accountability. Nguyen also manages the Higher Ed Public Opinion Hub, an online repository of higher education surveys, and co-authors Public Insight, New America's monthly newsletter that provides analysis on survey findings. Her work on public opinion has been featured in the New York Times, NPR, Inside Higher Ed, Higher Ed Dive, and other news outlets. Nguyen joined the program after graduating from Mount Holyoke College, where she earned a bachelor's degree in economics. She later earned a master's degree in higher education administration from the George Washington University School of Education and Human Development. Sophie Nguyen on LinkedIn → Kevin Carey Kevin Carey is Vice President for Education and Work at New America, a Washington, DC-based think tank. He writes widely about higher education and other topics for publications, including the New York Times, Atlantic, Washington Post, Vox, Slate, Chronicle of Higher Education, Inside Higher Ed, Washington Monthly, and elsewhere. Kevin Carey on LinkedIn → About the Host Dr. Drumm McNaughton is Principal Consultant and CEO of The Change Leader, Inc. —a highly sought-after higher education consultant with 20+ years of experience. Dr. McNaughton works with leadership, management, and boards of both U.S. and international institutions. His expertise spans key areas, including accreditation, governance, strategic planning , presidential onboarding, mergers, acquisitions, and strategic alliances. Dr. McNaughton’s approach combines a holistic methodology with a deep understanding of the contemporary and evolving challenges facing higher education institutions worldwide to ensure his clients succeed in their mission. Connect with Drumm McNaughton on LinkedIn →…

Changing Higher Ed

1
Accreditation NECHE Style: From Prescriptive to Nuanced 32:05

39 weeks ago32:05

32:05

Innovation in Higher Education Accreditation: How NECHE Leads Change Gone are the days of counting library books and checking boxes. With average presidential tenure plummeting to less than five years and a wave of institutional mergers reshaping American higher education, understanding the evolution from prescriptive to nuanced accreditation has become paramount for institutional survival. In this podcast, Dr. Drumm McNaughton, in discussion with Dr. Lawrence "Larry" Schall, President of the New England Commission on Higher Education (NECHE), shares insights on how accreditation has transformed from a compliance exercise into a partnership that helps institutions navigate contemporary challenges while maintaining academic quality and institutional accountability. Transformative Trends in Institutional Consolidation Demographic challenges are driving unprecedented changes in higher education structure. According to Schall, New England's unfavorable demographics have accelerated institutional mergers and consolidations, with public systems leading transformative change: 12 Connecticut community colleges have consolidated into a single college with multiple campuses Five Vermont state colleges merged to create Vermont State University. Maine pioneered the country's first system-wide consolidated accreditation. This seismic shift in institutional organization signals a fundamental change in how accrediting bodies must approach quality assurance and institutional oversight. Pioneering Approaches to Accreditation Innovation The conversation around accreditation has moved beyond traditional compliance to encompass comprehensive institutional transformation. NECHE exemplifies this evolution through: Implementation of accelerated degree programs Authorization of Spanish-language graduate programs within the U.S. Expansion of international accreditation Support for innovative educational delivery models Meeting Modern Higher Education Challenges NECHE's approach demonstrates how accreditors can maintain rigorous standards while supporting institutional innovation: Trust-based relationships with member institutions Regular presidential appearances before the commission Proactive communication about institutional challenges Flexible standards that encourage innovation while ensuring quality Three Takeaways for University Presidents and Boards Leadership stability and board-president alignment are critical for institutional success. With presidential tenure averaging less than five years, institutions struggle to implement meaningful change. Strong alignment between boards and presidents is essential for effective governance and institutional advancement. Traditional educational models are becoming outdated, with more innovation happening internationally than domestically. Institutions that proactively develop new models of education delivery are more likely to succeed in the next 25 years. Higher education leaders should look beyond conventional approaches to prepare for future disruption. The independence of higher education from government control is increasingly at risk. Political intervention in curriculum, governance, and accreditation threatens the fundamental strength of the American higher education system. Institutions must work to maintain their autonomy while demonstrating accountability and quality. Navigating accreditation challenges, merger discussions, or innovative program implementation can feel overwhelming. Your institution's mission and values matter. The Change Leader partners with you to tackle these complex challenges head-on, helping you stay true to who you are while meeting accreditation standards. We get it - you're not just another merger statistic. Your institution's unique identity and future matter. These are just some of the key insights and opportunities you will hear in this podcast—listen to the full episode for more. Read the transcript on our website: https://changinghighered.com/accreditation-neche-style-from-prescriptive-to-nuanced/ #HigherEducation #HigherEducationAccreditation #HigherEdChallenges About Our Podcast Guest Dr. Lawrence Schall joined the Commission staff as President in 2020. Previously, he served as President of Oglethorpe University in Atlanta, Georgia, for 15 years. During his tenure, Dr. Schall led the transformation of Oglethorpe from an at-risk institution to a university boasting a doubled class size and rigorous spending safeguards, raised over one hundred million dollars, and secured a solid financial outlook for the institution. Schall currently serves on the Board of Spelman College, the highly-ranked historically Black women’s college also in Atlanta. President Schall received his undergraduate degree from Swarthmore College and his J.D. and Ed. D. from the University of Pennsylvania. After practicing law as a civil rights attorney in Philadelphia for a decade, he served as Vice President of Administration at Swarthmore for 15 years before assuming the Presidency of Oglethorpe. Visit President Schall's blog, NECHE On The Road , to learn more about him and his work at the Commission. About the Host Dr. Drumm McNaughton is Principal Consultant and CEO of The Change Leader, Inc. A highly sought-after higher education consultant with 20+ years of experience. Dr. McNaughton works with leadership, management, and boards of both U.S. and international institutions. His expertise spans key areas, including accreditation , governance, strategic planning, presidential onboarding, mergers, acquisitions, and strategic alliances. Dr. McNaughton’s approach combines a holistic methodology with a deep understanding of the contemporary and evolving challenges facing higher education institutions worldwide to ensure his clients succeed in their mission. Connect with Drumm McNaughton on LinkedIn →…

Changing Higher Ed

1
Improving Public University Systems at Scale 37:27

40 weeks ago37:27

37:27

In this podcast, host Dr. Drumm McNaughton welcomes guest James R. Johnsen, the former President of the University of Alaska System, who is now a Vice President of Executive Search for Greenwood Asher & Associates. Johnsen discusses his new book, " Public University Systems: Leveraging Scale in Higher Education ," which examines the importance of and challenges facing public university systems across the U.S. What higher ed leaders will gain from this podcast: Understanding Public University Systems in Higher Education Governance A comprehensive overview of public university systems, their prevalence, importance, and the challenges they face. The different types of systems – homogenous and heterogeneous – and how they are structured, governed, and operated. This knowledge will be valuable for leaders in understanding the landscape of higher education in the context of their institutions. Leveraging Scale for Efficiency and Impact Public university systems have a unique ability to leverage their scale to achieve political, social, and economic goals. Benefits include consolidation and collaboration in areas such as procurement, research administration, payroll, legal counsel, and accreditation. Leaders can identify and implement strategies to maximize efficiency and impact through system-level initiatives. Navigating Political Dynamics in University Systems Political dynamics shape public university systems significantly, with roles for governors, legislators, and boards in forming higher education policy and funding. Understanding this landscape and developing strategies for effective advocacy is essential. Change Management and Leading Transformational Change Higher education systems face challenges in implementing change due to bureaucratic structures. Effective change management requires a clear vision, strong leadership, and a culture that embraces experimentation and continuous improvement. Prioritizing Student Success and Addressing State Needs Aligning higher education with student and state needs is crucial. Leaders can prioritize student success by streamlining processes, improving transferability, and focusing on outcomes that benefit both individuals and society, ensuring institutions contribute to the state's economic and social well-being. How Public University Systems Work (Or Don’t) 75% of American college students attend institutions within higher education systems. These systems aim to govern and coordinate public higher education within a state, yet effectiveness varies depending on structure, governance, and alignment with state goals. Structure and Governance Models in Public University Systems Public university systems vary in structure, affecting their governance and impact. Systems can be homogenous, like the University of California system, where institutions share similar missions, or heterogeneous, like the State University of New York system, which encompasses diverse missions. Governance models differ, with some states having a single board and others multiple boards with distinct responsibilities. For example, Florida has a Board of Governors for the entire system, while each university has its own Board of Trustees. Alignment and Collaboration for Higher Education Goals A key factor in system effectiveness is the alignment between state government, the system, and individual institutions. The governor’s vision should guide the system board, which then aligns institutional goals. Without clear alignment, systems risk fragmentation, duplicated efforts, and resource competition. Recommendations for Improving Public University Systems Clarify Higher Purpose and Goals for System-Wide Alignment Systems should articulate a higher purpose and align with the state's vision for higher education. This alignment enhances decision-making, resource allocation, and collaboration. Strengthen Leadership and Governance Skills System leaders need skills to navigate political landscapes, foster collaboration among institutions, and drive strategic change. Professional development focused on system leadership is essential. Streamline Processes and Foster Collaboration in Higher Education Systems Systems should streamline processes, reduce redundancy, and foster collaboration. Standardizing data collection, developing common course numbering for transferability, and creating shared service centers are effective strategies. Promote Data-Driven Decision Making in University Systems Effective governance relies on consistent, reliable data. Systems should invest in data infrastructure and analytics to support evidence-based decisions on resource allocation, program development, and student success. Cultivate a Culture of Innovation and Experimentation in Higher Education Encouraging a culture of innovation across institutions includes providing seed funding for pilot projects, enabling faculty collaboration, and celebrating successful innovations. By addressing these challenges and implementing these recommendations, public university systems can fulfill their mission of providing high-quality, accessible, and affordable education that meets the needs of students and the state. Three Key Takeaways for University Presidents and Boards These takeaways highlight the essential elements for effective leadership and governance within public university systems. Define a Higher Purpose Clarify the system's higher purpose. This purpose serves as a guiding principle for all decisions and actions, providing a shared understanding of the system's ultimate aim. It should transcend individual institutional interests and unite stakeholders around a common vision. Align Goals and Plans Align state goals, state plans, system goals, system plans, and institutional goals and plans. This hierarchical alignment ensures that efforts at all levels are coordinated and contribute to the overall vision and purpose. This framework reinforces the importance of a cohesive system working towards shared objectives. Develop Adaptive Leadership Develop adaptive leadership capabilities across the entire university, not just among those in leadership positions. Adaptive leadership involves fostering a culture where individuals at all levels are empowered to identify challenges, propose solutions, and adapt to changing circumstances. Read the full transcript at https://changinghighered.com/improving-public-university-systems-at-scale/ #HigherEducation #PublicUniversitySystems #ChangingHigherEd About Our Podcast Guest James R. Johnsen "I believe that success requires strong moral and ethical principles. As Vice President of Executive Search at Greenwood Asher & Associates, LLC, I aspire to live up to this notion by embracing change, building consensus, and establishing unity. Before joining GA&A, I served as a senior fellow at the National Association of System Heads (NASH). I helped develop a transformation agenda for public university systems and was the founding director of its Systems Center for State Policy. Well-versed in higher education planning and administration, I have written and presented research on higher-learning systems and taught graduate courses in negotiation. With a knack for evidence-based approaches to strategic planning, I’m passionate about finding innovative ways to solve critical pain points and attain organizational goals." Connect with Jim Johnsen on LinkedIn → About the Host Dr. Drumm McNaughton is Principal Consultant and CEO of The Change Leader, Inc. A highly sought-after higher education consultant with 20+ years of experience. Dr. McNaughton works with leadership, management, and boards of both U.S. and international institutions. His expertise spans key areas, including accreditation , governance, strategic planning, presidential onboarding, mergers, acquisitions, and strategic alliances. Dr. McNaughton’s approach combines a holistic methodology with a deep understanding of the contemporary and evolving challenges facing higher education institutions worldwide to ensure his clients succeed in their mission. Connect with Drumm McNaughton on LinkedIn →…

Changing Higher Ed

1
Effective University Mergers & Lessons in Stability from PASSHE 41:48

41 weeks ago41:48

41:48

In this episode of Changing Higher Ed , Dr. Drumm McNaughton interviews Dr. Daniel Greenstein, former Chancellor of the Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education (PASSHE), to explore strategic efforts in guiding one of the largest transformations in U.S. higher education. Over his six-year tenure, Greenstein led PASSHE’s integration of six universities into two larger institutions, tackling financial challenges, increasing program diversity, and improving student outcomes—all while maintaining each institution’s unique identity and local impact. The discussion covers the complexities involved in large-scale university mergers, including the need for legislative support, active stakeholder engagement, and partnerships with regulatory bodies like accreditors and the NCAA. Greenstein emphasizes that mergers should prioritize student success and community needs over financial motivations, with a purpose-driven approach ultimately yielding greater stability. Key Insights for Higher Education Leaders Understanding the “Why” Behind Mergers: Mergers are most successful when driven by a commitment to student success and community needs. Financial benefits follow naturally when institutions focus on core values rather than cost-cutting. Change Management as a Critical Tool: Advanced change management practices are essential, including careful planning, stakeholder engagement, and a governance framework that ensures accountability and data-informed decisions. Navigating Complex Regulatory Requirements: Practical guidance is offered on working with regulatory bodies, emphasizing the importance of collaborative relationships to smooth the integration process. Maintaining Brand Identity and Local Relevance: Particularly in rural areas, it’s essential to preserve each institution’s brand identity and community ties, ensuring integrated universities remain relevant and effective in serving local needs. Holistic Planning and Stakeholder Engagement: A comprehensive planning process involving stakeholders across all university functions optimizes student outcomes, advances diversity and inclusion, and enhances institutional effectiveness. Student-Centric Approach: McNaughton reflects on the need to prioritize student outcomes during mergers, agreeing that a student-centered focus is critical for long-term success. Collaborative Leadership and Teamwork: Effective mergers rely on teamwork among university leaders, legislators, and other stakeholders, with a shared commitment to the mission driving meaningful progress. Clear, Consistent Communication: Communication that is well-timed and consistent is essential in complex integrations, requiring disciplined messaging to keep all stakeholders aligned. Flexibility and Adaptability: The need for flexibility and adaptability is emphasized, as unexpected challenges require leaders to adjust strategies to achieve successful outcomes. Engaging External Expertise: External partners, such as accreditation bodies and project management firms, are invaluable in supporting complex mergers and helping to navigate the accreditation process . Navigating the Political Landscape: Mergers within public institutions involve political realities. Building broad support among legislators and communities is key to gaining approval and securing resources. Long-Term Perspective and Patience: Realizing merger benefits requires patience and a long-term outlook. Though initially challenging, such integrations ultimately lead to improved student outcomes, greater efficiency, and enhanced academic offerings. Three Takeaways for University Presidents and Boards You are not alone: Many institutions have undergone mergers, so seeking guidance from experienced leaders can provide invaluable insights and help prevent feelings of isolation. Confidence is Key: Leaders must maintain confidence in their ability to succeed, with resilience and belief in their capacity to see the process through. Focus on Core Values: Viewing mergers solely as cost-saving measures is limiting; prioritizing student and community needs naturally leads to financial stability and success. Read the show transcript on our website at: https://changinghighered.com/effective-university-mergers-lessons-in-stability-from-passhe/ #UniversityMergers #HigherEducation #HigherEdMergers About our guest Dr. Daniel Greenstein was the chancellor of Pennsylvania's State System of Higher Education from September 2018 to October 2024. In the role, he was the chief executive officer of the state's system of public universities, serving more than 80,000 students. Chancellor Greenstein led a system-wide redesign of PASSHE to increase student opportunities and university financial sustainability. Greenstein previously led the Postsecondary Success strategy at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, where he worked with other higher education leaders on initiatives to raise educational attainment levels and to promote economic mobility, especially among low-income and minority students. He developed and implemented a national strategy for increasing the number of degrees awarded and for reducing the attainment gaps among majority and non-majority students at U.S. colleges and universities. Greenstein was Vice Provost for Academic Planning and Programs for the University of California (UC) system. Connect with Dan Greenstein on LinkedIn → About the Host Dr. Drumm McNaughton is Principal Consultant and CEO of The Change Leader, Inc. A highly sought-after higher education consultant with 20+ years of experience. Dr. McNaughton works with leadership, management, and boards of both U.S. and international institutions. His expertise spans key areas, including accreditation , governance, strategic planning, presidential onboarding, mergers, acquisitions, and strategic alliances. Dr. McNaughton’s approach combines a holistic methodology with a deep understanding of the contemporary and evolving challenges facing higher education institutions worldwide to ensure his clients succeed in their mission. Connect with Drumm McNaughton on LinkedIn →…

Changing Higher Ed

1
STEM Enrollment Growth: Online Labs Drive Student Retention 28:51

42 weeks ago28:51

28:51

This episode features host Dr. Drumm McNaughton and guest Dr. Caitlin Runne-Janczy, Chief Academic Officer for Scientific Interactive, a company that provides hands-on and virtual science lab experiments to students. Drumm and Cait focus on the growing demand for online science lab courses, particularly in STEM fields. Cait discusses the results of a recent survey that found a significant increase in online lab enrollment and a corresponding decrease in on-campus enrollment. They also explore the challenges and opportunities of delivering quality online lab experiences, including safety considerations, lab setup, accreditation, and student learning outcomes. Cait highlights the importance of hands-on components in online labs and the potential for these courses to spark a passion for STEM beyond the individual student. Podcast Overview Some of the key insights and opportunities for higher education leaders who listen to this podcast: There is a growing demand for online science lab courses. Deans and department chairs report a greater than 70% increase in online lab enrollments and a corresponding 56% decrease in on-campus lab enrollments. 88% of students surveyed said it was important for them to have the opportunity to take an online science lab course, and 60% of those students would have enrolled elsewhere or not enrolled at all if an online lab option had not been available. Online science lab courses can be just as effective as on-campus courses if they include a hands-on component. Simulations have a place in the lab experience, but it must have some sort of hands-on element to really get students a comparable outcome to the campus counterpart. In the survey, 90% of faculty reported that students who take hands-on labs online have the knowledge and skills to continue in their degree progression. Online science lab courses can help institutions reach a broader range of students, including those who cannot attend on-campus classes due to work, family, or other obligations. This can help institutions grow their enrollment and retain more students. Online options also have a broader impact beyond just the individual student. For example, students who do lab kits at home with their families are expanding that love of science beyond just the individual student. Institutions need to be prepared to address the challenges of offering online science lab courses, such as ensuring student safety, providing adequate support to students, and meeting accreditation requirements. Safety is a key consideration for both students and institutions. Companies that provide lab kits typically cover liability insurance for the institution in case anything happens. Institutions need to provide adequate support to students who are taking online science lab courses, such as synchronous sessions, digital office hours, and digital lab partners. Accreditation bodies typically require online science lab courses to include a hands-on component to ensure that students have the transferable skills they need to continue in their degree program. Institutions should consider using online science lab courses as a way to improve student preparedness for on-campus lab courses. Students can do digital experiments before they get to campus so they can be familiar with the techniques and safety protocols that they will need to implement once they get to the lab. Institutions should partner with companies that have experience in developing and delivering online science lab courses. These companies can provide the expertise, resources, and support that institutions need to successfully offer these courses. Three Takeaways for University Presidents and Boards Growing demand for online science labs is creating urgency around digital transformation. Students are actively seeking these options and may choose other institutions that offer them. Building out online laboratory options is becoming a strategic imperative. Hands-on laboratory work remains essential for maintaining equivalency with on-campus experiences. While simulations play a role, physical experimentation must be part of online lab courses to ensure comparable learning outcomes. Online lab options offer a broader societal impact beyond individual student success. By making STEM education more accessible and visible, these courses can inspire interest in STEM fields among students' families, peers, and broader communities. Online science lab courses are a growing trend in higher education, and institutions that are prepared to embrace this trend will be well-positioned to meet the needs of their students and the demands of the 21st-century workforce. These are just some of the key insights and opportunities you will hear in this podcast—listen to the full episode for more. Final Thoughts Accreditation is essential, and institutions must ensure that online labs meet the same standards as traditional labs. They need to understand the requirements of their accrediting bodies and have robust methods to assess and demonstrate student learning outcomes. Partnering with experienced companies can be beneficial, but institutions are ultimately responsible for meeting accreditation standards and ensuring quality. The idea of using virtual pre-labs to better prepare students for on-campus labs is promising and could improve student performance in both settings. Institutions need to approach online science labs thoughtfully, balancing innovation with academic rigor and ensuring that students receive a high-quality education. Read the transcript on our website at https://changinghighered.com/stem-enrollment-growth-online-labs-drive-student-retention/ #STEMOnline #HigherEducation #EnrollmentGrowth About Our Podcast Guest Cait Runne-Janczy Dr. Runne-Janczy is the Chief Academic Officer and oversees all curriculum development and lab creation. She and her team endeavor to create the same lab experience in people’s homes that they might experience on campus, as well as digital simulations where appropriate. She and her team of PhD experts have built, from the ground up, over 450 individual labs across 11 disciplines. She is passionate about increasing access to STEM education by delivering new modalities of instruction. Dr. Runne-Janczy is a graduate of Marist College and received her PhD from the University of Iowa. About the Host Dr. Drumm McNaughton is Principal Consultant and CEO of The Change Leader, Inc. A highly sought-after higher education consultant with 20+ years of experience. Dr. McNaughton works with leadership, management, and boards of both U.S. and international institutions. His expertise spans key areas, including accreditation , governance, strategic planning, presidential onboarding, mergers, acquisitions, and strategic alliances. Dr. McNaughton’s approach combines a holistic methodology with a deep understanding of the contemporary and evolving challenges facing higher education institutions worldwide to ensure his clients succeed in their mission.…

Changing Higher Ed

1
Innovative Accreditation: Accelerated Degrees and Competency-Based Education 33:00

43 weeks ago33:00

33:00

Innovative Accreditation: Transforming Higher Education Dr. Sonny Ramaswamy and Dr. Selena M. Grace, leaders at the Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities (NWCCU), join Dr. Drumm McNaughton in the second of this two-part podcast to discuss groundbreaking innovations in higher education accreditation. They explore accelerated degrees, competency-based education, and the evolving landscape of workforce development. Key Discussion Points Accelerated Bachelor's Degree Programs: NWCCU's approval of a pilot three-year bachelor's degree program. Historical context of the traditional four-year model and its limitations. Rigorous evaluation processes to ensure educational quality in accelerated programs. Competency-Based Education (CBE): Focus on demonstrable skills and knowledge rather than seat time. NWCCU's approach to evaluating CBE programs. Emphasis on clear learning outcomes and robust assessment methods. Innovations in Accreditation: NWCCU's role as a facilitator of institutional innovation. Implementation of a portfolio model and high-contact approach with institutions. Support for a wide range of innovations while maintaining quality standards. Workforce Development and Higher Education: Addressing the needs of an estimated 40 million Americans requiring reskilling and upskilling. Integration of micro-credentials and certification programs. Balancing flexibility with maintaining high educational standards. Assessment and Learning Outcomes: Importance of clearly defined learning outcomes at course and program levels. Use of multiple assessment methods and regular curriculum review. Emphasis on programmatic assessment to capture disciplinary learning outcomes. Three Key Takeaways for Higher Education Leaders and Boards Embrace innovation in degree formats and educational delivery methods. Focus on workforce development and lifelong learning opportunities. Prioritize clear assessment strategies and learning outcomes in new educational models. Read the transcript and extended show summary on our website at: https://changinghighered.com/innovative-accreditation-accelerated-degrees-and-competency-based-education/ #HigherEducation #HigherEdAccreditation #AcceleratedDegrees About Our Guests Sonny Ramaswamy is president of Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities , which accredits institutions in Alaska, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and British Columbia. President Barack Obama appointed Sonny to direct the National Institute of Food and Agriculture , which funded research and education in food, agriculture, and natural resources. He served as dean of Oregon State’s College of Agricultural Sciences, director of Purdue’s Agricultural Research Programs, university distinguished professor and head of entomology at Kansas State, and professor of entomology at Mississippi State. Sonny’s BSc (Agriculture) and MSc (Entomology) are from the University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore; his PhD (Entomology) is from Rutgers. He did postdoc research at Michigan State University. Selena M. Grace is currently the Executive Vice President of the Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities (NWCCU). She has been at NWCCU since 2020. Previously, she served as Vice Provost for Academic Strategy & Institutional Effectiveness at Idaho State University. She was a member of the inaugural cohort of the WICHE Western Academic Leadership Academy, and her previous experience includes Chief Academic Officer at the Idaho State Board of Education where she was the primary author and manager of the Complete College Idaho Plan. She is a first-generation college graduate. She has a B.A. in English with a writing emphasis and a minor in Native American Studies from Boise State University, an M.F.A. in creative writing and non-fiction from George Mason University, and a Ph.D. in public policy and administration from Boise State University. About the Host Dr. Drumm McNaughton is the founder, CEO, and Principal Consultant at The Change Leader, Inc. A highly sought-after higher education consultant with 20+ years of experience, Dr. McNaughton works with leadership, management, and boards of both U.S. and international institutions. His expertise spans key areas, including accreditation , governance, strategic planning, presidential onboarding, mergers, acquisitions, and strategic alliances. Dr. McNaughton’s approach combines a holistic methodology with a deep understanding of the contemporary and evolving challenges facing higher education institutions worldwide to ensure his clients succeed in their mission.…

Changing Higher Ed

1
NWCCU Advances Higher Ed Accreditation: 3-Year Bachelor Degree and Institutional Collaboration 33:45

44 weeks ago33:45