Artwork

Content provided by Patrick McKenzie. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Patrick McKenzie or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

You can’t retract the facts

42:03
 
Share
 

Manage episode 467555278 series 3585666
Content provided by Patrick McKenzie. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Patrick McKenzie or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.

In this episode, Patrick McKenzie (@patio11) responds to a recent request by a crypto unicorn founder / bank CEO to retract his essay Debanking (and debunking?). Come for the note about editorial standards and independence, stay for the diss track.

Full transcript available here: https://www.complexsystemspodcast.com/editorial-standards-and-independence/


Sponsors: Safebase | Check

Ready to save time and close deals faster? Inbound security reviews shouldn’t slow down your team or your sales cycle. Leading companies use SafeBase to eliminate up to 98% of inbound security questionnaires, automate workflows, and accelerate pipeline. Go to safebase.io/podcast

Check is the leading payroll infrastructure provider and pioneer of embedded payroll. Check makes it easy for any SaaS platform to build a payroll business, and already powers 60+ popular platforms. Head to checkhq.com/complex and tell them patio11 sent you.

Recommended in this episode:

Twitter:

@patio11

Timestamps:

(00:00) Intro

(03:04) Musical interlude

(04:56) Return to commentary

(06:35) You can’t please everyone

(08:06) The bar for retraction is high

(10:07) Our review of the retraction request

(10:37) “A few areas were incorrect or misleading”

(16:12) “Lots of omission of key facts”

(18:57) “Missing the point about what we mean by debunking”

(20:40) Sponsors: Safebase | Check

(25:00) Our response to McCauley’s testimony
(28:24) McCauley’s concluding remarks and our response
(30:21) Bank CEOs do not often ask writers for retractions

(34:20) Some context regarding custodial banks

(40:50) Returning to our regularly scheduled programming

  continue reading

49 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 467555278 series 3585666
Content provided by Patrick McKenzie. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Patrick McKenzie or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.

In this episode, Patrick McKenzie (@patio11) responds to a recent request by a crypto unicorn founder / bank CEO to retract his essay Debanking (and debunking?). Come for the note about editorial standards and independence, stay for the diss track.

Full transcript available here: https://www.complexsystemspodcast.com/editorial-standards-and-independence/


Sponsors: Safebase | Check

Ready to save time and close deals faster? Inbound security reviews shouldn’t slow down your team or your sales cycle. Leading companies use SafeBase to eliminate up to 98% of inbound security questionnaires, automate workflows, and accelerate pipeline. Go to safebase.io/podcast

Check is the leading payroll infrastructure provider and pioneer of embedded payroll. Check makes it easy for any SaaS platform to build a payroll business, and already powers 60+ popular platforms. Head to checkhq.com/complex and tell them patio11 sent you.

Recommended in this episode:

Twitter:

@patio11

Timestamps:

(00:00) Intro

(03:04) Musical interlude

(04:56) Return to commentary

(06:35) You can’t please everyone

(08:06) The bar for retraction is high

(10:07) Our review of the retraction request

(10:37) “A few areas were incorrect or misleading”

(16:12) “Lots of omission of key facts”

(18:57) “Missing the point about what we mean by debunking”

(20:40) Sponsors: Safebase | Check

(25:00) Our response to McCauley’s testimony
(28:24) McCauley’s concluding remarks and our response
(30:21) Bank CEOs do not often ask writers for retractions

(34:20) Some context regarding custodial banks

(40:50) Returning to our regularly scheduled programming

  continue reading

49 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play