An award-winning cannabis podcast for women, by women. Hear joyful stories and useful advice about cannabis for health, well-being, and fun—especially for needs specific to women like stress, sleep, and sex. We cover everything from: What’s the best weed for sex? Can I use CBD for menstrual cramps? What are the effects of the Harlequin strain or Gelato strain? And, why do we prefer to call it “cannabis” instead of “marijuana”? We also hear from you: your first time buying legal weed, and how ...
…
continue reading
Content provided by SCCE. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by SCCE or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!
Go offline with the Player FM app!
James Tillen on the UK Compliance Guidance on Failure to Prevent Fraud [Podcast]
MP3•Episode home
Manage episode 489234214 series 2837193
Content provided by SCCE. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by SCCE or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
By Adam Turteltaub On November 6, 2024, the U.K.'s Home Office issued Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023: Guidance to organisations on the offence of failure to prevent fraud (the Guidance). It comes out of the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act (ECCTA), which establishes that a corporation can be held criminally liable for failing to prevent fraud committed by any “associated person” for the benefit of the company. This “associated person” can be an employee or even a third party. There is a defense, explains James Tillen, member at Miller & Chevalier, for organizations that had reasonable prevention procedures at the time of the offence. What constitutes reasonable? There are six principles: Top level commitment A risk assessment Proportionate risk-based prevention procedures Due diligence Communication and training Monitoring and review Sound familiar? It is, since it builds off the guidance for the UK Bribery Act and is very similar to the US approach. It’s not identical, though, since, unlike the US criteria for evaluating compliance programs, this guidance is fraud-specific, with details designed to address the risks posed by the fraud triangle of motive, opportunity and rationalization. Listen in to learn more about the guidance and the particular attention it pays to monitoring the mental well-being of employees. Listen now
…
continue reading
103 episodes
MP3•Episode home
Manage episode 489234214 series 2837193
Content provided by SCCE. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by SCCE or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
By Adam Turteltaub On November 6, 2024, the U.K.'s Home Office issued Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023: Guidance to organisations on the offence of failure to prevent fraud (the Guidance). It comes out of the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act (ECCTA), which establishes that a corporation can be held criminally liable for failing to prevent fraud committed by any “associated person” for the benefit of the company. This “associated person” can be an employee or even a third party. There is a defense, explains James Tillen, member at Miller & Chevalier, for organizations that had reasonable prevention procedures at the time of the offence. What constitutes reasonable? There are six principles: Top level commitment A risk assessment Proportionate risk-based prevention procedures Due diligence Communication and training Monitoring and review Sound familiar? It is, since it builds off the guidance for the UK Bribery Act and is very similar to the US approach. It’s not identical, though, since, unlike the US criteria for evaluating compliance programs, this guidance is fraud-specific, with details designed to address the risks posed by the fraud triangle of motive, opportunity and rationalization. Listen in to learn more about the guidance and the particular attention it pays to monitoring the mental well-being of employees. Listen now
…
continue reading
103 episodes
All episodes
×Welcome to Player FM!
Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.