Artwork

Content provided by Conversations with Institutional Investors and Investment Innovation Institute [i3]. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Conversations with Institutional Investors and Investment Innovation Institute [i3] or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

107: Scott Donald on Governance and Member Meetings

39:07
 
Share
 

Manage episode 458865103 series 1770598
Content provided by Conversations with Institutional Investors and Investment Innovation Institute [i3]. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Conversations with Institutional Investors and Investment Innovation Institute [i3] or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
In episode 107 of the [i3] Institutional Investment Podcast, we speak with Scott Donald, Associate Professor at the School of Private and Commercial Law of the University of New South Wales, about his research into governance and the now mandatory annual member meetings of superannuation funds. How do funds field questions from members? How can we check they answer all questions? What impact do these meetings have on the corporate culture and brand of a fund? After collecting nearly five years of data, Scott shares his insights into these interactions with members. Overview of Podcast with Associate Professor Scott Donald: 02:00 Researching the intersection of Annual Member Meetings and governance 03:00 Five years ago a rule came into effect that funds needed to hold annual member meetings. Do funds see it as a box ticking exercise, or do they take the opportunity to build a brand through these meetings? 6:30 The Q&A process in these meetings are way more specified than in a (listed company) AGM 09:00 Member meetings don’t have the disciplinary effect that an AGM has 10:30 How do we know if the chair has identified some of the more uncomfortable questions? 11:30 There isn’t really a mechanism for a member to say: ‘Hey, I asked this question and you didn’t really give an answer’ 13:00 Most questions get asked about fund returns 16:00 Climate risk questions are the second biggest in terms of the number of questions, after returns. We were interested to see whether all of those questions were from activists 17:30 What signal do we take from the questions being asked? I think there is a danger of misinterpreting that signal 23:00 Inconvenient questions for members 26:00 I hope funds will take a more bespoke and thoughtful approach to member meeting, rather than a this-is-best-practice and move on 27:30 False and misleading statement risk 30:00 Legitimacy is an issue in super and member meetings are a way of putting a face to super 31:00 We don’t know the extent to which the regulator is switched on to all these questions being asked 32:30 We are close to finalising the fifth season of member meetings and we will write that up 35:00 Upcoming research might look at the use of AI in super funds
  continue reading

111 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 458865103 series 1770598
Content provided by Conversations with Institutional Investors and Investment Innovation Institute [i3]. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Conversations with Institutional Investors and Investment Innovation Institute [i3] or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
In episode 107 of the [i3] Institutional Investment Podcast, we speak with Scott Donald, Associate Professor at the School of Private and Commercial Law of the University of New South Wales, about his research into governance and the now mandatory annual member meetings of superannuation funds. How do funds field questions from members? How can we check they answer all questions? What impact do these meetings have on the corporate culture and brand of a fund? After collecting nearly five years of data, Scott shares his insights into these interactions with members. Overview of Podcast with Associate Professor Scott Donald: 02:00 Researching the intersection of Annual Member Meetings and governance 03:00 Five years ago a rule came into effect that funds needed to hold annual member meetings. Do funds see it as a box ticking exercise, or do they take the opportunity to build a brand through these meetings? 6:30 The Q&A process in these meetings are way more specified than in a (listed company) AGM 09:00 Member meetings don’t have the disciplinary effect that an AGM has 10:30 How do we know if the chair has identified some of the more uncomfortable questions? 11:30 There isn’t really a mechanism for a member to say: ‘Hey, I asked this question and you didn’t really give an answer’ 13:00 Most questions get asked about fund returns 16:00 Climate risk questions are the second biggest in terms of the number of questions, after returns. We were interested to see whether all of those questions were from activists 17:30 What signal do we take from the questions being asked? I think there is a danger of misinterpreting that signal 23:00 Inconvenient questions for members 26:00 I hope funds will take a more bespoke and thoughtful approach to member meeting, rather than a this-is-best-practice and move on 27:30 False and misleading statement risk 30:00 Legitimacy is an issue in super and member meetings are a way of putting a face to super 31:00 We don’t know the extent to which the regulator is switched on to all these questions being asked 32:30 We are close to finalising the fifth season of member meetings and we will write that up 35:00 Upcoming research might look at the use of AI in super funds
  continue reading

111 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide

Listen to this show while you explore
Play