))
“Quiet Quitting”: What Is It? What Should We Do About It?
Manage episode 365767687 series 3144837
Content provided by Peter C. Kiefer. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Peter C. Kiefer or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
April 27, 2023, A Question of Ethics Conversation Episode
“Quiet Quitting.” It is a topic that many of us have heard about. In an era where it is a challenge to hire employees, is “Quiet Quitting” an emerging change in the contract between the court and employees or is it just a new term for some staff not doing their jobs?
In the past it has been given many names: “retiring in place”, “phoning it in,” or “checking out.” What makes this iteration unusual is that it seems to be a mantra heard from younger workers. Millennials and Gen Z workers have often uttered this expression.
-What is Quite Quitting?
-What are the ethical challenges the court faces to ensure professionalism diligence of staff?
-How can we ensure that we have a common understanding with staff?
-Is this a new term for an old problem?
-What Should we do about It?
Today’s Moderator
Eric Silverberg: Court Administrator, Municipal Court, Tucson, Arizona
Today’s Panel
Courtney Whiteside: Director, Municipal Court, St. Louis, Missouri
Kent Pankey: Senior Planner, State Supreme Court, Richmond, Virginia
Norman Meyer: Retired Clerk of Court, United States Bankruptcy Court, Albuquerque, New Mexico
Peter Kiefer: Retired Court Professional
Tina Mattison: Deputy Court Administrator, Consolidated Justice Court, Tucson, Arizona
Karl Thoennes: Court Administrator, Second Judicial Circuit Court, Sioux Falls, South Dakota
Samantha Borden: Staff Assistant, Customer Solutions Division, Water Department, Tucson, Arizona
107 episodes
Share
