Col Doug Macgregor: TRUMP'S BEST PLAY at Alaska Summit w/PUTIN

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

Recognizing Russia’s security interests

The speaker compares Western disregard for Russia’s security concerns in Ukraine to ignoring foreign military buildups in Canada or Mexico.

He argues the U.S. and NATO must acknowledge Russia’s legitimate national security interests for a settlement to work.

Challenges for a Trump–Putin deal

Even if Trump and Putin agree on concepts like Ukraine’s neutrality and no NATO membership, there’s the question of who enforces neutrality.

Trump has little real authority over NATO leaders, who often pursue their own agendas (examples: UK, France, Germany).

Without the ability to deliver on commitments—especially from Zelensky, Britain, France, or Germany—Trump might have to publicly admit that the U.S. can’t move its allies and disengage, leaving Ukraine’s fate to Europeans.

Eastern and Central European stakes

Countries like Poland, Slovakia, Hungary, and possibly Moldova or Romania must consider whether they want hundreds of thousands of Russian troops on their borders.

Russia doesn’t seek that outcome, but could be compelled if no one negotiates seriously.

Some nations might eventually push for direct talks with Moscow to avoid “permanent war,” though political and economic ties to the U.S. make this risky.

Putin’s offer & Western rejection

Retired General Jack Keane frames Putin’s position as a demand for Ukraine to give up strategic territory in Donetsk (a fortified belt of five cities along Highway 20) while Russia gives nothing in return.

Keane calls this unacceptable, but the speaker points out that Russian forces are currently penetrating deeply into those same areas, making such dismissals unrealistic.

Putin’s position hasn’t changed—Russia is advancing faster and is unwilling to give up gains. The only alternative to accepting this reality would be direct war with Russia, which could escalate to nuclear conflict.

Trump’s public stance & contradictions

Trump says Zelensky is not invited to the Alaska meeting, criticizing his three years of talks without results.

He claims he can tell within two minutes of meeting Putin whether a deal is possible—because “that’s what I do, I make deals”—yet also says it’s “not up to me to make a deal.”

His plan is to meet Putin, then brief Zelensky and European leaders afterward.

Criticism of Trump’s Azerbaijan–Armenia “deal”

The speaker dismisses Trump’s recent Azerbaijan–Armenia agreement as meaningless:

It requires parliamentary approval in both countries and faces strong opposition.

Iran views it as a hostile encirclement move.

Russia, with troops still in Armenia, is skeptical.

The deal is seen as an example of U.S. lack of staying power in distant conflicts, which is weaker now than at any time in the last 50 years.

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.