))
Sponsor to Organization vs. Direct Investigator Agreements: Pros & Cons
Manage episode 474415891 series 3506216
Content provided by Darshan Kulkarni. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Darshan Kulkarni or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
Edye Edens from KLF highlights the key differences between sponsor-to-organization agreements and direct investigator agreements. Larger research organizations and academic medical centers often prefer sponsor-to-organization agreements because they provide structured negotiations around intellectual property (IP) rights, indirect costs, liability protections, and compliance oversight. These agreements also ensure that investigators have access to institutional resources and support.
On the other hand, direct investigator agreements may offer a faster turnaround, but they come with greater risks. Investigators negotiating independently might agree to terms that organizations would typically reject, potentially exposing themselves to legal and financial liabilities.
Understanding these distinctions is crucial for managing risk. While direct agreements may have their place, it’s essential to carefully evaluate the terms and ensure adequate protections. If you're unsure about the best approach for your situation, consult legal experts before signing. Need guidance? Get in touch with KLF.
216 episodes
Share
