))
Lee Strobel: WRONGFUL CHARGE On Man Shows How To View EVIDENCE For CHRIST'S RESURRECTION? (Debunked)
Manage episode 480038843 series 3656107
Content provided by Charles Hurst. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Charles Hurst or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
Strobel claims that he was an atheist. I am stating that I don't think Lee Strobel was an atheist at all when he conducted his interviews for his popular book, THE CASE FOR CHRIST. Lee uses an analogy from an old wrongful charge on a career criminal to show how one must be willing to be objective. However, as you will see, he fails to follow his own pointed methods that he advises in this introductory chapter. Because that is what Evangelists and other Christian fundamentalists do. They don't study the facts, they attempt to twist them to fit their own worldview.
THE SECOND FALL. For what would a Yeshua really be like in the Apocalypse? Sure to offend a few, and then maybe a few more.
https://www.amazon.com/SECOND-FALL-Charles-Hurst/dp/B08RR9SJFM
FOR THE VISUALLY MOTIVATED CLICK HERE FOR THESE EPISODES:
https://www.youtube.com/@debunkingthefundamentalist
SOURCES
STEVE CHIVES: "An Atheist Reads The Case For Christ: Conclusion."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qQ3U-YURag
15 episodes
Share
