From Guild Secrets to Modern Work: Process Thinking is the Key to your Productivity - DBR 085
MP3•Episode home
Manage episode 489961855 series 3562406
Content provided by Larry Tribble, Ph.D. and Larry Tribble. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Larry Tribble, Ph.D. and Larry Tribble or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
Today, I'm going to outline the current progress in the pursuit of increasing knowledge work productivity. I'll have some suggestions about how you can improve your productivity. Mostly, this is encouragement and motivation to do the work required to get on top of your game and stay there.
…
continue reading
- Purpose: understand that Knowledge Work Productivity is not a solved problem while recognizing good directions to go to solve it.
- Value for you #1: understand where we are in this work, so you'll know where to go next.
- Value for you #2: recognizing that knowledge work management represents a competitive advantage in the market for talent. You'll be 1) more productive, 2) less burned-out, 3) a faster learner, and 4) better at your job as you develop these skills.
- Knowledge worker productivity is not a solved problem, and individuals should avoid being complacent with existing tools or solutions.
- Historically, manual work processes were often guarded secrets within guilds, creating a "mystery" around how tasks were performed and hindering process improvement thinking.
- In the early 20th century, Taylor introduced time and motion studies to break down work into discrete steps and identify improvements.
- A scientific management analysis of knowledge work has not yet been performed.
- Individuals often believe their knowledge work is uniquely different and cannot benefit from generalized process improvements.
- Productivity tools are often not designed for users' personal effectiveness but rather to sell better.
- Software development is expensive, leading companies to avoid costly new features without clear justification, which contributes to software being "relatively static".
- Users may experience "learned helplessness" with computer tools, leading to complacency where they assume existing tools are the best available and avoid the effort of seeking or implementing changes.
- We need a scientific management approach to knowledge work, particularly focusing on personal information management, which is crucial for managing attention.
- This approach involves analyzing sequential steps, breaking down sub-processes, and identifying areas of waste.
- For knowledge workers, "attention" is the primary productive asset to optimize, not just time.
- Focus first on eliminating waste, especially waste of attention based in task switching.
- Then (and only then) break down processes and improve sub-components.
- Avoid constantly switching tools, the learning curve and difficulty of effective experimentation make it too expensive and often unproductive.
- Instead, engage with your own processes, understand your system, and develop repeatable processes for your work.
85 episodes