Artwork

Content provided by Jayme Edwards and Tech Career Strategist. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Jayme Edwards and Tech Career Strategist or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Is There Really Such Thing as a GOOD Programmer?

14:29
 
Share
 

Manage episode 330690988 series 1756036
Content provided by Jayme Edwards and Tech Career Strategist. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Jayme Edwards and Tech Career Strategist or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.

It's tempting to compare yourself to other developers or take skill assessments to see how you measure up, but honestly it's impossible to truly know if you're a good programmer!

In this video I share what I've learned over my 25 year career as a programmer, software architect, and consultant that I hope reduces any anxiety you may have around your self worth.

To start this off: why do we even care if we're good programmer?

Well first of all, the people who depend on us to do a good job as a developer need to know we're competent and can get the job done. Basically our coworkers have expectations, and we want to meet them.

The second main reason I see people caring how good they are, and is the bigger focus of this episode, is comparing themselves to others! With social media (especially LinkedIn) and other influential people showing off their accomplishments, we often wonder how we measure up. But that's a dangerous game.

How do we try to assess how good of programmers we are?

The first way is skill assessments like tests, bootcamp outcomes, certifications etc. And while these can help, I don't put much stock in them. They usually have a very focused and narrow view.

The second way is looking at what we've accomplished in our career as programmers. Have we produced good output for the company? Have we been able to get features out in a reasonable time?

The third way is getting feedback! While performance reviews can help, asking another developer, manager, or another trusted professional for explicit feedback is a great way to find out.

There are two reasons why I don't believe we can really know how good we are.

The first is that we don't have a standard definition of what makes a good programmer. There are so many skills we need! Coding, testing, DevOps, wiki topics, scrum, kanban, data science - it's crazy. And that's only the technical and process stuff. There are also all of our personality traits like openness, coachability, motivation and such.

The second reason why we can't really know how good we are is based on the Dunning-Kruger effect. I left a link below where you can read more about it. But it explains what I experienced in my career. That I went through a progression of growing confidence until I realized my own incompetence, then had to build it all over again.

We go through these cycles of high and low confidence uniquely for every skill we use as a programmer! So be kind to yourself. It's practically impossible to know how good you are, because we're all different, and we're all growing different skills at different times!

Join my Patreon: https://thrivingtechnologist.com/patreon

Learn about one-on-one career coaching with me: https://thrivingtechnologist.com/coaching

TechRolepedia, a wiki about the top 25 roles in tech: https://thrivingtechnologist.com/techroles

The Thriving Technologist career guide: https://thrivingtechnologist.com/guide

You can also watch this episode on YouTube.

Episode timelinks:

(0:00) Introduction (0:35) Why Care If We're Good? (0:39) Reason #1: Confidence (0:50) Reason #2: We're Comparing Ourselves (1:17) How Do We Evaluate Skill? (1:23) Eval Approach #1: Assessments (2:15) Eval Approach #2: Accomplishments (2:48) Eval Approach #3: Feedback (3:39) Why Can't I Know??? (3:58) Reason #1: No Standard (6:10) Reason #2: Warped Self-Image (8:00) The Dunning-Kruger Effect (10:15) Having Realistic Expectations (11:20) Every Skill Grows at a Different Pace (12:52) Next Time (13:33) Episode Groove

Visit me at thrivingtechnologist.com

  continue reading

178 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 330690988 series 1756036
Content provided by Jayme Edwards and Tech Career Strategist. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Jayme Edwards and Tech Career Strategist or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.

It's tempting to compare yourself to other developers or take skill assessments to see how you measure up, but honestly it's impossible to truly know if you're a good programmer!

In this video I share what I've learned over my 25 year career as a programmer, software architect, and consultant that I hope reduces any anxiety you may have around your self worth.

To start this off: why do we even care if we're good programmer?

Well first of all, the people who depend on us to do a good job as a developer need to know we're competent and can get the job done. Basically our coworkers have expectations, and we want to meet them.

The second main reason I see people caring how good they are, and is the bigger focus of this episode, is comparing themselves to others! With social media (especially LinkedIn) and other influential people showing off their accomplishments, we often wonder how we measure up. But that's a dangerous game.

How do we try to assess how good of programmers we are?

The first way is skill assessments like tests, bootcamp outcomes, certifications etc. And while these can help, I don't put much stock in them. They usually have a very focused and narrow view.

The second way is looking at what we've accomplished in our career as programmers. Have we produced good output for the company? Have we been able to get features out in a reasonable time?

The third way is getting feedback! While performance reviews can help, asking another developer, manager, or another trusted professional for explicit feedback is a great way to find out.

There are two reasons why I don't believe we can really know how good we are.

The first is that we don't have a standard definition of what makes a good programmer. There are so many skills we need! Coding, testing, DevOps, wiki topics, scrum, kanban, data science - it's crazy. And that's only the technical and process stuff. There are also all of our personality traits like openness, coachability, motivation and such.

The second reason why we can't really know how good we are is based on the Dunning-Kruger effect. I left a link below where you can read more about it. But it explains what I experienced in my career. That I went through a progression of growing confidence until I realized my own incompetence, then had to build it all over again.

We go through these cycles of high and low confidence uniquely for every skill we use as a programmer! So be kind to yourself. It's practically impossible to know how good you are, because we're all different, and we're all growing different skills at different times!

Join my Patreon: https://thrivingtechnologist.com/patreon

Learn about one-on-one career coaching with me: https://thrivingtechnologist.com/coaching

TechRolepedia, a wiki about the top 25 roles in tech: https://thrivingtechnologist.com/techroles

The Thriving Technologist career guide: https://thrivingtechnologist.com/guide

You can also watch this episode on YouTube.

Episode timelinks:

(0:00) Introduction (0:35) Why Care If We're Good? (0:39) Reason #1: Confidence (0:50) Reason #2: We're Comparing Ourselves (1:17) How Do We Evaluate Skill? (1:23) Eval Approach #1: Assessments (2:15) Eval Approach #2: Accomplishments (2:48) Eval Approach #3: Feedback (3:39) Why Can't I Know??? (3:58) Reason #1: No Standard (6:10) Reason #2: Warped Self-Image (8:00) The Dunning-Kruger Effect (10:15) Having Realistic Expectations (11:20) Every Skill Grows at a Different Pace (12:52) Next Time (13:33) Episode Groove

Visit me at thrivingtechnologist.com

  continue reading

178 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play