The UK Column is an independent news organisation analysing the information war. Operating without financial backing or external investment, we remain free from advertisers, foundations, and political parties, relying solely on support from our audience through memberships and donations.
…
continue reading
Content provided by Audioboom and True Crime Today. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Audioboom and True Crime Today or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!
Go offline with the Player FM app!
Alex Murdaugh Appeal EXPOSED: Prosecutors DENY IMPACT Of Jury Tampering Claims
MP3•Episode home
Manage episode 499878625 series 3418589
Content provided by Audioboom and True Crime Today. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Audioboom and True Crime Today or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
Alex Murdaugh Appeal EXPOSED: Prosecutors DENY IMPACT Of Jury Tampering Claims
The battle over Alex Murdaugh’s murder conviction just hit another explosive chapter — and this time, it’s the State firing back. In a newly filed 182-page brief, South Carolina prosecutors are urging the state supreme court to reject Murdaugh’s push for a new trial, despite allegations of jury tampering by court clerk Becky Hill.
Hill allegedly told jurors during the trial to “watch his body language,” a comment Murdaugh’s defense team says crossed the line and poisoned the verdict. They argue that when a court official makes a statement like that, the law should presume prejudice — and that presumption alone should be enough to warrant a retrial.
But prosecutors aren’t conceding an inch. They describe Hill’s conduct as “foolish and fleeting,” not the kind of influence that changes the outcome. They point to the January 2024 evidentiary hearing, where retired Chief Justice Jean Toal found no credible proof the remark affected deliberations. And they remind the court of the evidence that sealed Murdaugh’s fate: the kennel video placing him at the crime scene minutes before the murders, his repeated lies about being there, and the phone data locking him into the timeline.
The State also defends the week of financial-crime testimony — which the defense claims was unfairly prejudicial — saying it established a clear motive. They argue that even if Hill’s comment was improper, the evidence against Murdaugh was overwhelming, making any misstep harmless.
Now, with Murdaugh’s team preparing their reply and oral arguments expected in the fall, the South Carolina Supreme Court will have to decide: was this a harmless slip, or a crack in the foundation big enough to collapse the whole verdict?
#AlexMurdaugh #TrueCrime #CourtroomDrama #JuryTampering #MurdaughTrial #LegalNews #CrimeNews #SouthCarolina #TrueCrimeToday #HiddenKillers
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?
Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod
Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
The battle over Alex Murdaugh’s murder conviction just hit another explosive chapter — and this time, it’s the State firing back. In a newly filed 182-page brief, South Carolina prosecutors are urging the state supreme court to reject Murdaugh’s push for a new trial, despite allegations of jury tampering by court clerk Becky Hill.
Hill allegedly told jurors during the trial to “watch his body language,” a comment Murdaugh’s defense team says crossed the line and poisoned the verdict. They argue that when a court official makes a statement like that, the law should presume prejudice — and that presumption alone should be enough to warrant a retrial.
But prosecutors aren’t conceding an inch. They describe Hill’s conduct as “foolish and fleeting,” not the kind of influence that changes the outcome. They point to the January 2024 evidentiary hearing, where retired Chief Justice Jean Toal found no credible proof the remark affected deliberations. And they remind the court of the evidence that sealed Murdaugh’s fate: the kennel video placing him at the crime scene minutes before the murders, his repeated lies about being there, and the phone data locking him into the timeline.
The State also defends the week of financial-crime testimony — which the defense claims was unfairly prejudicial — saying it established a clear motive. They argue that even if Hill’s comment was improper, the evidence against Murdaugh was overwhelming, making any misstep harmless.
Now, with Murdaugh’s team preparing their reply and oral arguments expected in the fall, the South Carolina Supreme Court will have to decide: was this a harmless slip, or a crack in the foundation big enough to collapse the whole verdict?
#AlexMurdaugh #TrueCrime #CourtroomDrama #JuryTampering #MurdaughTrial #LegalNews #CrimeNews #SouthCarolina #TrueCrimeToday #HiddenKillers
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?
Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod
Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
9800 episodes
Alex Murdaugh Appeal EXPOSED: Prosecutors DENY IMPACT Of Jury Tampering Claims
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
MP3•Episode home
Manage episode 499878625 series 3418589
Content provided by Audioboom and True Crime Today. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Audioboom and True Crime Today or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
Alex Murdaugh Appeal EXPOSED: Prosecutors DENY IMPACT Of Jury Tampering Claims
The battle over Alex Murdaugh’s murder conviction just hit another explosive chapter — and this time, it’s the State firing back. In a newly filed 182-page brief, South Carolina prosecutors are urging the state supreme court to reject Murdaugh’s push for a new trial, despite allegations of jury tampering by court clerk Becky Hill.
Hill allegedly told jurors during the trial to “watch his body language,” a comment Murdaugh’s defense team says crossed the line and poisoned the verdict. They argue that when a court official makes a statement like that, the law should presume prejudice — and that presumption alone should be enough to warrant a retrial.
But prosecutors aren’t conceding an inch. They describe Hill’s conduct as “foolish and fleeting,” not the kind of influence that changes the outcome. They point to the January 2024 evidentiary hearing, where retired Chief Justice Jean Toal found no credible proof the remark affected deliberations. And they remind the court of the evidence that sealed Murdaugh’s fate: the kennel video placing him at the crime scene minutes before the murders, his repeated lies about being there, and the phone data locking him into the timeline.
The State also defends the week of financial-crime testimony — which the defense claims was unfairly prejudicial — saying it established a clear motive. They argue that even if Hill’s comment was improper, the evidence against Murdaugh was overwhelming, making any misstep harmless.
Now, with Murdaugh’s team preparing their reply and oral arguments expected in the fall, the South Carolina Supreme Court will have to decide: was this a harmless slip, or a crack in the foundation big enough to collapse the whole verdict?
#AlexMurdaugh #TrueCrime #CourtroomDrama #JuryTampering #MurdaughTrial #LegalNews #CrimeNews #SouthCarolina #TrueCrimeToday #HiddenKillers
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?
Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod
Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
The battle over Alex Murdaugh’s murder conviction just hit another explosive chapter — and this time, it’s the State firing back. In a newly filed 182-page brief, South Carolina prosecutors are urging the state supreme court to reject Murdaugh’s push for a new trial, despite allegations of jury tampering by court clerk Becky Hill.
Hill allegedly told jurors during the trial to “watch his body language,” a comment Murdaugh’s defense team says crossed the line and poisoned the verdict. They argue that when a court official makes a statement like that, the law should presume prejudice — and that presumption alone should be enough to warrant a retrial.
But prosecutors aren’t conceding an inch. They describe Hill’s conduct as “foolish and fleeting,” not the kind of influence that changes the outcome. They point to the January 2024 evidentiary hearing, where retired Chief Justice Jean Toal found no credible proof the remark affected deliberations. And they remind the court of the evidence that sealed Murdaugh’s fate: the kennel video placing him at the crime scene minutes before the murders, his repeated lies about being there, and the phone data locking him into the timeline.
The State also defends the week of financial-crime testimony — which the defense claims was unfairly prejudicial — saying it established a clear motive. They argue that even if Hill’s comment was improper, the evidence against Murdaugh was overwhelming, making any misstep harmless.
Now, with Murdaugh’s team preparing their reply and oral arguments expected in the fall, the South Carolina Supreme Court will have to decide: was this a harmless slip, or a crack in the foundation big enough to collapse the whole verdict?
#AlexMurdaugh #TrueCrime #CourtroomDrama #JuryTampering #MurdaughTrial #LegalNews #CrimeNews #SouthCarolina #TrueCrimeToday #HiddenKillers
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?
Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod
Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
9800 episodes
All episodes
×Welcome to Player FM!
Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.