Artwork

Content provided by Audioboom and True Crime Today. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Audioboom and True Crime Today or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Will A Sloppy Investigation Set Karen Read Free? Bob Motta Talks

10:10
 
Share
 

Manage episode 482574322 series 3418589
Content provided by Audioboom and True Crime Today. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Audioboom and True Crime Today or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
Will A Sloppy Investigation Set Karen Read Free? Bob Motta Talks

Tony Brueski and Bob Motta tackle the elephant in the courtroom: the sloppy, questionable, and arguably negligent police investigation into the death of John O’Keefe. From the inexplicable failure to request a consent search of the Albert residence — where O’Keefe was allegedly dropped off — to the mishandling of key evidence like clotted blood in Solo cups and a fragmented taillight that appeared only after Proctor revisited the scene, Motta argues that this case is riddled with procedural red flags.
Motta explains the legal strategy at play — invoking the Bowden defense — which allows the defense to argue that reasonable doubt stems not from what the state proved, but from what they failed to investigate. If you’re prosecuting Karen Read but never checked inside the house she claims O’Keefe entered, did you really do your job? The trial, Motta says, doesn’t hinge only on what happened, but on what the government didn’t bother to find out.
Tony plays devil’s advocate, raising the issue of practical challenges like a blizzard burying the crime scene — but Motta maintains: if Proctor hadn’t tunnel-visioned on Karen Read from day one, better decisions would’ve followed. The system didn’t just fail Karen Read — it failed John O’Keefe too.
This episode breaks down the difference between proving innocence and exposing investigative incompetence — and why the latter just might be enough for a not guilty verdict.
Hashtags:
#KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #BadInvestigation #BobMotta #ProctorProblem #SoloCups #PoliceAccountability #TrueCrime #BowdenDefense #JusticeForJohnOKeefe
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?

Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok
https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter
https://x.com/tonybpod
Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here:
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
  continue reading

8882 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 482574322 series 3418589
Content provided by Audioboom and True Crime Today. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Audioboom and True Crime Today or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
Will A Sloppy Investigation Set Karen Read Free? Bob Motta Talks

Tony Brueski and Bob Motta tackle the elephant in the courtroom: the sloppy, questionable, and arguably negligent police investigation into the death of John O’Keefe. From the inexplicable failure to request a consent search of the Albert residence — where O’Keefe was allegedly dropped off — to the mishandling of key evidence like clotted blood in Solo cups and a fragmented taillight that appeared only after Proctor revisited the scene, Motta argues that this case is riddled with procedural red flags.
Motta explains the legal strategy at play — invoking the Bowden defense — which allows the defense to argue that reasonable doubt stems not from what the state proved, but from what they failed to investigate. If you’re prosecuting Karen Read but never checked inside the house she claims O’Keefe entered, did you really do your job? The trial, Motta says, doesn’t hinge only on what happened, but on what the government didn’t bother to find out.
Tony plays devil’s advocate, raising the issue of practical challenges like a blizzard burying the crime scene — but Motta maintains: if Proctor hadn’t tunnel-visioned on Karen Read from day one, better decisions would’ve followed. The system didn’t just fail Karen Read — it failed John O’Keefe too.
This episode breaks down the difference between proving innocence and exposing investigative incompetence — and why the latter just might be enough for a not guilty verdict.
Hashtags:
#KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #BadInvestigation #BobMotta #ProctorProblem #SoloCups #PoliceAccountability #TrueCrime #BowdenDefense #JusticeForJohnOKeefe
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?

Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok
https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter
https://x.com/tonybpod
Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here:
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
  continue reading

8882 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide

Listen to this show while you explore
Play