))
From $10,000 Offer to $130,000 Verdict, with Eric Chaffin and Justin Joseph
Manage episode 481618125 series 3490836
Content provided by Brendan Lupetin. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Brendan Lupetin or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
"We're big believers in looking at cases and trying to drive the value we believe they're worth," says Eric Chaffin about the $130,000 verdict he and Justin Joseph secured when the insurance company offered just $10,000. Host Brendan Lupetin explores how the trial partners transformed a "typical" meniscal tear case into a compelling human story. Using psychodrama techniques and focusing on the emotional impact of the injury, they convinced jurors to look beyond minimal vehicle damage and limited medical treatment to see the true impact on their "quintessential Pittsburgh" beer delivery driver client.
Learn More and Connect
☑️ Eric Chaffin | LinkedIn | Instagram
☑️ Justin Joseph | LinkedIn | Instagram
☑️ Chaffin Luhana on LinkedIn | Instagram | Facebook | YouTube
☑️ Brendan Lupetin | LinkedIn
☑️ Connect: Facebook | LinkedIn | YouTube
☑️ Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTube
Episode Preview
- The client, a 58-year-old beer delivery driver, was injured when a garbage truck backed into his stopped vehicle, striking his knee against the dash and tearing his meniscus.
- Despite being an admitted liability case, the defense challenged causation, arguing the meniscal tear was age-related rather than traumatic.
- The attorneys used psychodrama to help their "stoic Pittsburgher" client better visualize and articulate his experience, strengthening factual and emotional aspects of his testimony.
- When the defense admitted liability just days before trial, the attorneys pivoted their strategy to focus exclusively on damages, emphasizing the human impact of the injury.
- A key defense mistake was continuing to challenge the client's credibility even after admitting liability, allowing the plaintiff's team to highlight the contradiction of "accepting responsibility" while simultaneously attacking their client.
- Despite the client having only six months of documented treatment, the jury awarded $30,000 for past pain and suffering and $100,000 for future damages, recognizing the ongoing impact of the injury.
Ready to refer or collaborate on med mal, medical negligence, and catastrophic injury cases? Visit our attorney referral page at PAMedMal.com/Refer. We handle cases in Pennsylvania and across the United States.
Produced and Powered by LawPods
50 episodes
Share
