
Go offline with the Player FM app!
Estoppel: Principles of Consistency and Reliance in Civil Law (Part 1 of 2)
Manage episode 475780858 series 3243553
This lecture explores the legal doctrine of estoppel, a principle that prevents a party from asserting a position that contradicts one they previously took, especially when another party has relied upon that initial position to their detriment. Rooted in fairness and justice, estoppel doctrines aim to uphold consistency and prevent parties from acting in bad faith by shifting their legal stance after inducing reliance.
The lecture provides a comprehensive examination of various forms of estoppel, including:
Equitable Estoppel – Arising when one party, through words, conduct, or silence, induces another to act to their detriment.
Promissory Estoppel – Typically used in contract law when a promise, though unsupported by formal consideration, is enforced due to reasonable reliance.
Judicial Estoppel – Prevents a party from taking inconsistent positions in judicial proceedings to protect the integrity of the courts.
Collateral Estoppel (Issue Preclusion) – Bars the re-litigation of specific issues previously decided in prior lawsuits.
Estoppel by Deed and Estoppel by Record – Doctrines specific to property law and procedural rules, respectively.
We will delve into the essential elements of each type of estoppel, including representations, reliance, detriment, and fairness considerations. The lecture also covers landmark cases that have shaped the modern understanding of estoppel, compares common law and equitable origins, and analyzes the doctrine’s application in various areas such as contract disputes, real property transactions, civil procedure, and administrative law.
Doctrinal tensions, such as the boundaries between estoppel and waiver, as well as debates around estoppel’s applicability against the government, are explored in detail. The lecture concludes by evaluating policy implications and criticisms, including the potential for estoppel to undermine statutory rights, complicate legal predictability, or create opportunities for strategic litigation behavior.
By the end of this lecture, the listener will be equipped with a deep and nuanced understanding of how estoppel functions to reinforce consistency, equity, and reliance in legal proceedings.
1437 episodes
Manage episode 475780858 series 3243553
This lecture explores the legal doctrine of estoppel, a principle that prevents a party from asserting a position that contradicts one they previously took, especially when another party has relied upon that initial position to their detriment. Rooted in fairness and justice, estoppel doctrines aim to uphold consistency and prevent parties from acting in bad faith by shifting their legal stance after inducing reliance.
The lecture provides a comprehensive examination of various forms of estoppel, including:
Equitable Estoppel – Arising when one party, through words, conduct, or silence, induces another to act to their detriment.
Promissory Estoppel – Typically used in contract law when a promise, though unsupported by formal consideration, is enforced due to reasonable reliance.
Judicial Estoppel – Prevents a party from taking inconsistent positions in judicial proceedings to protect the integrity of the courts.
Collateral Estoppel (Issue Preclusion) – Bars the re-litigation of specific issues previously decided in prior lawsuits.
Estoppel by Deed and Estoppel by Record – Doctrines specific to property law and procedural rules, respectively.
We will delve into the essential elements of each type of estoppel, including representations, reliance, detriment, and fairness considerations. The lecture also covers landmark cases that have shaped the modern understanding of estoppel, compares common law and equitable origins, and analyzes the doctrine’s application in various areas such as contract disputes, real property transactions, civil procedure, and administrative law.
Doctrinal tensions, such as the boundaries between estoppel and waiver, as well as debates around estoppel’s applicability against the government, are explored in detail. The lecture concludes by evaluating policy implications and criticisms, including the potential for estoppel to undermine statutory rights, complicate legal predictability, or create opportunities for strategic litigation behavior.
By the end of this lecture, the listener will be equipped with a deep and nuanced understanding of how estoppel functions to reinforce consistency, equity, and reliance in legal proceedings.
1437 episodes
All episodes
×Welcome to Player FM!
Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.