Artwork

Content provided by Linear Digressions, Ben Jaffe, and Katie Malone. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Linear Digressions, Ben Jaffe, and Katie Malone or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Optimizing for the short-term vs. the long-term

19:24
 
Share
 

Manage episode 248653247 series 2527355
Content provided by Linear Digressions, Ben Jaffe, and Katie Malone. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Linear Digressions, Ben Jaffe, and Katie Malone or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
When data scientists run experiments, like A/B tests, it’s really easy to plan on a period of a few days to a few weeks for collecting data. The thing is, the change that’s being evaluated might have effects that last a lot longer than a few days or a few weeks—having a big sale might increase sales this week, but doing that repeatedly will teach customers to wait until there’s a sale and never buy anything at full price, which could ultimately drive down revenue in the long term. Increasing the volume of ads on a website might lead people to click on more ads in the short term, but in the long term they’ll be more likely to visually block the ads out and learn to ignore them. But these long-term effects aren’t apparent from the short-term experiment, so this week we’re talking about a paper from Google research that confronts the short-term vs. long-term tradeoff, and how to measure long-term effects from short-term experiments. Relevant links: https://research.google/pubs/pub43887/
  continue reading

291 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 248653247 series 2527355
Content provided by Linear Digressions, Ben Jaffe, and Katie Malone. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Linear Digressions, Ben Jaffe, and Katie Malone or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
When data scientists run experiments, like A/B tests, it’s really easy to plan on a period of a few days to a few weeks for collecting data. The thing is, the change that’s being evaluated might have effects that last a lot longer than a few days or a few weeks—having a big sale might increase sales this week, but doing that repeatedly will teach customers to wait until there’s a sale and never buy anything at full price, which could ultimately drive down revenue in the long term. Increasing the volume of ads on a website might lead people to click on more ads in the short term, but in the long term they’ll be more likely to visually block the ads out and learn to ignore them. But these long-term effects aren’t apparent from the short-term experiment, so this week we’re talking about a paper from Google research that confronts the short-term vs. long-term tradeoff, and how to measure long-term effects from short-term experiments. Relevant links: https://research.google/pubs/pub43887/
  continue reading

291 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide

Listen to this show while you explore
Play