Artwork

Content provided by Not On Record Podcast and Possibly Correct Media. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Not On Record Podcast and Possibly Correct Media or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

EP#158 | The Legality of BDSM & Bodily Harm

34:53
 
Share
 

Manage episode 471747631 series 3417894
Content provided by Not On Record Podcast and Possibly Correct Media. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Not On Record Podcast and Possibly Correct Media or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
In episode 158 of Not On Record, Joseph and Diana delve into the complex legal landscape surrounding BDSM and bodily harm, spotlighting a recent case, R. v. Pearson (2025 ONSC 435), from the Ontario Superior Court. The episode begins by revisiting the recurring theme of consent and legality in BDSM practices, spurred by the mainstream influence of works like Fifty Shades of Grey. They outline five key legal takeaways: advanced consent via contracts is not legally binding, consent to bodily harm is invalid, agreements like "no means yes" are impermissible, participants must know who is involved to consent, and judges ultimately determine consent boundaries—often with a conservative bent. The discussion pivots to the Pearson case, where extreme BDSM acts like caning, stapling, and choking were examined, alongside a contested incident involving a baseball bat. The hosts highlight how defense lawyer Jordan Gold effectively leveraged expert testimony to challenge existing laws, prompting a judicial postscript urging reconsideration of whether BDSM-related bodily harm should remain categorically non-consentable. Website: http://www.NotOnRecordpodcast.com Sign up to our email list - http://eepurl.com/hw3g99 Social Media Links Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/NotonRecord Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/notonrecordpodcast/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@notonrecordpodcast Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/notonrecord Telegram: https://t.me/NotOnRecord Minds: http://www.minds.com/notonrecord Audio Platforms Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4F2ssnX7ktfGH8OzH4QsuX Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/not-on-record-podcast/id1565405753 SoundCloud: https://soundcloud.com/notonrecord Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-842207 For more information on criminal law issues go to Neuberger & Partners LLP http://www.nrlawyers.com. Produced by Possibly Correct Media www.PossiblyCorrect.com
  continue reading

172 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 471747631 series 3417894
Content provided by Not On Record Podcast and Possibly Correct Media. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Not On Record Podcast and Possibly Correct Media or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
In episode 158 of Not On Record, Joseph and Diana delve into the complex legal landscape surrounding BDSM and bodily harm, spotlighting a recent case, R. v. Pearson (2025 ONSC 435), from the Ontario Superior Court. The episode begins by revisiting the recurring theme of consent and legality in BDSM practices, spurred by the mainstream influence of works like Fifty Shades of Grey. They outline five key legal takeaways: advanced consent via contracts is not legally binding, consent to bodily harm is invalid, agreements like "no means yes" are impermissible, participants must know who is involved to consent, and judges ultimately determine consent boundaries—often with a conservative bent. The discussion pivots to the Pearson case, where extreme BDSM acts like caning, stapling, and choking were examined, alongside a contested incident involving a baseball bat. The hosts highlight how defense lawyer Jordan Gold effectively leveraged expert testimony to challenge existing laws, prompting a judicial postscript urging reconsideration of whether BDSM-related bodily harm should remain categorically non-consentable. Website: http://www.NotOnRecordpodcast.com Sign up to our email list - http://eepurl.com/hw3g99 Social Media Links Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/NotonRecord Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/notonrecordpodcast/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@notonrecordpodcast Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/notonrecord Telegram: https://t.me/NotOnRecord Minds: http://www.minds.com/notonrecord Audio Platforms Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4F2ssnX7ktfGH8OzH4QsuX Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/not-on-record-podcast/id1565405753 SoundCloud: https://soundcloud.com/notonrecord Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-842207 For more information on criminal law issues go to Neuberger & Partners LLP http://www.nrlawyers.com. Produced by Possibly Correct Media www.PossiblyCorrect.com
  continue reading

172 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play