))
Insanity, or Just an Excuse?
Manage episode 477816196 series 3659984
Content provided by Lazaro. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Lazaro or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
Is the insanity defense a necessary protection for the mentally ill? Or is it a clever legal loophole used by defense attorneys?
In this episode, Host Lazaro unpacks one of the most controversial and misunderstood defenses in the criminal justice system. From the roots of the M'Naughten Rule to famous cases such as Andrea Yates and John Hinckley Jr, in this episode we will explore what it really means to be "not guilty by reason of insanity"
In this episode you will learn the psychological and legal standards behind the plea, how forensic experts determine mental state, and why public opinion often clashes with courtroom decisions. We will also tackle some uncomfortable ethical questions such as who gets to decide if someone deserves punishment or treatment?
Whether you're a psychology student, law nerd, or just curious about all the intricates where the mind and law collide, this episode is for you.
Tune in and ask yourself: Can justice and compassion coexist in a courtroom?
Email: [email protected]
3 episodes
Share
