))
Melanie Sulkin – Turning a Low-Impact Crash into a $583K Verdict
Manage episode 465370814 series 3495461
Content provided by Keith Fuicelli, Fuicelli & Lee and Keith Fuicelli. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Keith Fuicelli, Fuicelli & Lee and Keith Fuicelli or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
At a glance, the two large vehicles involved in a rear-end collision – a Toyota 4Runner and a Nissan Xterra – didn’t appear visibly damaged. And Melanie Sulkin’s client didn’t appear injured.
But Melanie pursued the case beyond surface images. She recounts her methods with host Keith Fuicelli. From proving the significant frame damage to her client’s car and the permanent injury to her client’s rotator cuff, Melanie describes an approach that yielded a jury verdict of nearly $583,000.
Learn More and Connect with Colorado Trial Lawyers
☑️ Melanie Sulkin | LinkedIn
☑️ Krivit Law | LinkedIn | Instagram | Facebook
☑️ Keith Fuicelli | LinkedIn
☑️ Fuicelli & Lee Injury Lawyers
☑️ Fuicelli & Lee Injury Lawyers on X, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and LinkedIn
☑️ Subscribe Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTube
Episode Snapshot
- Melanie found her calling as an undergraduate when she founded Northern Illinois University’s mock trial team.
- Early in her career, Melanie was on the team that tried the first M2a Magnum Biomet case in the country.
- In a recent case, Melanie represented a client who was rear-ended, but both her client’s car and the defendant’s car showed little to no visible property damage.
- Even though the defendant originally admitted fault, his stories changed during trial in an attempt to place some blame on Melanie’s client.
- In arguing that the crash caused her client’s rotator cuff tear, Melanie showed photos of the car, and her client testified that she had the entire frame repaired.
- Melanie struck many jurors who said during voir dire that her client “looks fine.”
- When the “mechanism of injury” became a question at trial, Melanie elicited an answer from the defense surgeon.
- The defendant’s insurance carrier initially agreed to a demand of $300,000, but then backed off. For Melanie’s client, the decision to go to trial was easy. “They told us to make a demand, we did it, and they didn't make good on it,” Melanie says.
The information contained in this podcast is not intended to be taken as legal advice. The information provided by Fuicelli & Lee is intended to provide general information regarding comprehensive injury and accident attorney services for clients in the state of Colorado.
28 episodes
Share
