))
'Decoding CJEU Judgments': CELS Seminar
Manage episode 454969094 series 3623336
Content provided by Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, Faculty of Law, and University of Cambridge. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, Faculty of Law, and University of Cambridge or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
Speaker: Eleanor Sharpston KC, Advocate General, CJEU (2006-2020) and Goodhart Professor, University of Cambridge (2023/2024)
Abstract: A common complaint of common lawyers is that the way in which CJEU judgments are written is abstract and obscure. The criticism is levelled most notably at judgments that reply to requests for a preliminary ruling from national courts. Once you understand about language and the Court, there are a lot of hidden clues, if you only know where to look for them. This second seminar is designed to help you squeeze the maximum information out of the text, and alert you to what those formulae you’re reading really mean.
For more information see: https://www.cels.law.cam.ac.uk/weekly-seminar-series
164 episodes
Share
