Artwork

Content provided by Better Informed Network. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Better Informed Network or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Oklahoma v. Environmental Protection Agency, No. 23-1067 [Arg: 03.25.2025 ]

47:51
 
Share
 

Manage episode 482993924 series 2558408
Content provided by Better Informed Network. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Better Informed Network or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.

Issue(s): Whether a final action by the Environmental Protection Agency taken pursuant to its Clean Air Act authority with respect to a single state or region may be challenged only in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit because the agency published the action in the same Federal Register notice as actions affecting other states or regions and claimed to use a consistent analysis for all states.

★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
  continue reading

369 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 482993924 series 2558408
Content provided by Better Informed Network. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Better Informed Network or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.

Issue(s): Whether a final action by the Environmental Protection Agency taken pursuant to its Clean Air Act authority with respect to a single state or region may be challenged only in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit because the agency published the action in the same Federal Register notice as actions affecting other states or regions and claimed to use a consistent analysis for all states.

★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
  continue reading

369 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play