Ashley Parham Responds To Drew "Druski" Desbordes And His Diddy Related Sanctions Motion (6/3/25)

The Epstein Chronicles

In the case of Parham v. Combs (Case No. 3:24-cv-07191-RFL), the plaintiffs—Ashley Parham, Jane Doe, and John Doe—filed an opposition to Defendant Drew Desbordes' motion for sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. The plaintiffs argue that their claims are grounded in factual evidence and legal precedent, asserting that Desbordes' motion is an attempt to intimidate and silence them rather than a legitimate challenge to the lawsuit's validity. They maintain that their allegations are made in good faith and are supported by substantial evidence, thereby rendering the motion for sanctions unwarranted.
Furthermore, the plaintiffs contend that Desbordes' motion misrepresents the nature of their claims and overlooks the seriousness of the alleged misconduct. They emphasize that the motion lacks merit and should be denied to uphold the integrity of the judicial process and protect the rights of individuals seeking redress for alleged wrongdoings.
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
gov.uscourts.cand.437874.41.0.pdf
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.