Player FM - Internet Radio Done Right
15 subscribers
Checked 39m ago
Added three years ago
Content provided by Bobby Capucci. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Bobby Capucci or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!
Go offline with the Player FM app!
Podcasts Worth a Listen
SPONSORED
<
<div class="span index">1</div> <span><a class="" data-remote="true" data-type="html" href="/series/squid-game-the-official-podcast">Squid Game: The Official Podcast</a></span>


The final season is here—and Squid Game: The Official Podcast is your ultimate companion to the end of the Game. Hosts Phil Yu and Kiera Please return once more to break down every shocking twist and betrayal, and the choices that will determine who, if anyone, makes it out alive. Will Player 456 and the cast of characters we’ve grown to love finally be able to dismantle the games for good? Or will the cycle continue? Alongside creators, cultural critics, and viral internet voices, Phil and Kiera provide their own theories for how the season ends, and what Squid Game ultimately reveals about power, sacrifice, and the systems that shape us. The biggest question isn’t who wins—it’s what it means to be human. Squid Game: The Official Podcast returns Friday, June 27th.
Mega Edition: The Memo In Law Supporting Diddy's Motion For A Hearing And Relief (Part 3-4) (6/10/25)
Manage episode 487912694 series 3380507
Content provided by Bobby Capucci. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Bobby Capucci or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
In the case of United States v. Sean Combs (24-cr-542), the defense has filed a memorandum seeking a hearing, suppression of evidence, and other relief. The defense argues that government leaks have led to prejudicial pre-trial publicity, compromising Combs' right to a fair trial. They specifically allege that the Department of Homeland Security leaked a 2016 video showing Combs assaulting his then-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura, to tarnish his reputation. The defense requests an evidentiary hearing to investigate these leaks, discovery of related government communications, a gag order to prevent further disclosures, and suppression of any evidence obtained through these alleged leaks.
Additionally, the defense contends that the conditions of Combs' pre-trial detention hinder his ability to prepare for trial, infringing upon his constitutional rights. They propose a comprehensive bail package, including a $50 million bond secured by property and co-signed by family members, home detention with electronic monitoring, and strict limitations on communication and visitation. The defense asserts that these measures sufficiently mitigate any concerns regarding flight risk or danger to the community, emphasizing Combs' strong family ties and community involvement.
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.98.0.pdf
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
…
continue reading
Additionally, the defense contends that the conditions of Combs' pre-trial detention hinder his ability to prepare for trial, infringing upon his constitutional rights. They propose a comprehensive bail package, including a $50 million bond secured by property and co-signed by family members, home detention with electronic monitoring, and strict limitations on communication and visitation. The defense asserts that these measures sufficiently mitigate any concerns regarding flight risk or danger to the community, emphasizing Combs' strong family ties and community involvement.
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.98.0.pdf
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
1032 episodes
Manage episode 487912694 series 3380507
Content provided by Bobby Capucci. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Bobby Capucci or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
In the case of United States v. Sean Combs (24-cr-542), the defense has filed a memorandum seeking a hearing, suppression of evidence, and other relief. The defense argues that government leaks have led to prejudicial pre-trial publicity, compromising Combs' right to a fair trial. They specifically allege that the Department of Homeland Security leaked a 2016 video showing Combs assaulting his then-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura, to tarnish his reputation. The defense requests an evidentiary hearing to investigate these leaks, discovery of related government communications, a gag order to prevent further disclosures, and suppression of any evidence obtained through these alleged leaks.
Additionally, the defense contends that the conditions of Combs' pre-trial detention hinder his ability to prepare for trial, infringing upon his constitutional rights. They propose a comprehensive bail package, including a $50 million bond secured by property and co-signed by family members, home detention with electronic monitoring, and strict limitations on communication and visitation. The defense asserts that these measures sufficiently mitigate any concerns regarding flight risk or danger to the community, emphasizing Combs' strong family ties and community involvement.
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.98.0.pdf
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
…
continue reading
Additionally, the defense contends that the conditions of Combs' pre-trial detention hinder his ability to prepare for trial, infringing upon his constitutional rights. They propose a comprehensive bail package, including a $50 million bond secured by property and co-signed by family members, home detention with electronic monitoring, and strict limitations on communication and visitation. The defense asserts that these measures sufficiently mitigate any concerns regarding flight risk or danger to the community, emphasizing Combs' strong family ties and community involvement.
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.98.0.pdf
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
1032 episodes
All episodes
×
1 Jeffrey Epstein And The Revolving Door At The White House During Clintons Reign 32:44
32:44
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked32:44
In this episode we explore the many, many trips that Jeffrey Epstein took to the White House to visit then President Bill Clinton and according to a new report, he wasn't alone bringing up to 8 female companions with him on these trips. Not only that, but during the time that Epstein and Maxwell were most active visiting the white house, they were also actively running a trafficking operation according to Maxwell's conviction. The question now becomes...will the legacy media care? (Commercial at 19:06) To contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com Source: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10394863/Jeffrey-Epstein-brought-eight-women-Clinton-White-House.html Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…

1 Ghislaine Maxwell Looks To Use Her Clinton Ties To Lighten Her Sentence (Part 2) 14:00
14:00
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked14:00
The relationship between the Clintons and Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein is indisputable at this point. Yet the legacy media still refuses to accept the facts for what they are: Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton were very, very close to Epstein and Maxwell. The question is, when will the legacy media do their job and get all of the sordid details? My guess is, never. (commercial at 16:36) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10935097/Ghislaine-Maxwell-touted-connection-Bill-Clinton-lower-sentence-trafficking.html Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…

1 Ghislaine Maxwell Looks To Use Her Clinton Ties To Lighten Her Sentence (Part 1) 24:04
24:04
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked24:04
The relationship between the Clintons and Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein is indisputable at this point. Yet the legacy media still refuses to accept the facts for what they are: Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton were very, very close to Epstein and Maxwell. The question is, when will the legacy media do their job and get all of the sordid details? My guess is, never. (commercial at 16:36) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10935097/Ghislaine-Maxwell-touted-connection-Bill-Clinton-lower-sentence-trafficking.html Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…

1 Judge Berman's Opinion And Order Denying Jeffrey Epstein's Bail Attempt (Part 2) (7/20/25) 13:04
13:04
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked13:04
In case number 19 CR. 490 (RMB), the United States government brought formal criminal charges against Jeffrey Epstein, leading to a court-issued Decision & Order Remanding Defendant. This order came after Epstein’s arrest in July 2019 on federal sex trafficking charges involving underage girls. The court reviewed Epstein’s bail proposal—which included offering his Manhattan townhouse as collateral and agreeing to strict conditions—but ultimately found that no set of conditions could guarantee his appearance at trial or ensure the safety of the community. The decision emphasized both the serious nature of the charges and Epstein’s substantial financial resources and international ties, which posed a clear flight risk. As a result, the court ordered Epstein to be remanded to custody, meaning he was to remain in federal detention without bail until trial. The ruling rejected arguments from Epstein’s legal team that he could be trusted to comply with any pretrial release conditions. The court also cited concerns about witness tampering and the possibility of further harm to victims. This decision effectively kept Epstein at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in Manhattan, where he remained until his controversial death one month later. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Epstein-berman.pdf Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…

1 Judge Berman's Opinion And Order Denying Jeffrey Epstein's Bail Attempt (Part 1) (7/20/25) 12:53
12:53
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked12:53
In case number 19 CR. 490 (RMB), the United States government brought formal criminal charges against Jeffrey Epstein, leading to a court-issued Decision & Order Remanding Defendant. This order came after Epstein’s arrest in July 2019 on federal sex trafficking charges involving underage girls. The court reviewed Epstein’s bail proposal—which included offering his Manhattan townhouse as collateral and agreeing to strict conditions—but ultimately found that no set of conditions could guarantee his appearance at trial or ensure the safety of the community. The decision emphasized both the serious nature of the charges and Epstein’s substantial financial resources and international ties, which posed a clear flight risk. As a result, the court ordered Epstein to be remanded to custody, meaning he was to remain in federal detention without bail until trial. The ruling rejected arguments from Epstein’s legal team that he could be trusted to comply with any pretrial release conditions. The court also cited concerns about witness tampering and the possibility of further harm to victims. This decision effectively kept Epstein at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in Manhattan, where he remained until his controversial death one month later. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Epstein-berman.pdf Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…

1 Surviving Jeffrey Epstein: Chauntae Davies (7/20/25) 10:53
10:53
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked10:53
Chauntae Davies, who was recruited as a masseuse for Jeffrey Epstein through Ghislaine Maxwell while training in massage therapy, alleges that her first encounter quickly turned sexual when Epstein masturbated in front of her. She returned under pressure and manipulation, believing that further appointments would rectify the situation. However, she claims that on the third or fourth session, Epstein raped her—beginning a pattern of repeated sexual abuse over a span of approximately four years across multiple locations, including New York, his Palm Beach mansion, the Caribbean island, and internationally Davies describes being groomed through seemingly generous gestures—Epstein paid for her culinary education and her sister’s overseas studies—to blur the lines between caretaker and exploiter. She says that his and Maxwell’s control, plus the power dynamics highlighted by Epstein’s influential connections, made it difficult to escape until much later. Though Epstein died before she could confront him in court, Davies continues to fight for justice, expressing enduring fear and a sense that he remains “winning in death,” keeping the victims from closure. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Jeffrey Epstein victim claims he raped her before bragging about friendship with Prince Andrew | Daily Mail Online Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…

1 Bill Clinton Also Sent A "Gushing" Letter To Jeffrey Epstein For His 50th Birthday (7/20/25) 14:35
14:35
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked14:35
Bill Clinton is now reported to have sent a “warm and gushing” handwritten letter to Jeffrey Epstein for his 50th birthday. The letter was said to be included in a leather-bound birthday album organized by Ghislaine Maxwell in 2003. It was written on Clinton’s official stationery and allegedly conveyed affectionate and complimentary sentiments toward Epstein. This newly revealed detail further underscores Clinton’s long-documented personal connection to Epstein during a time when the disgraced financier was deeply embedded in elite social circles. While Clinton’s note lacks the overtly crude tone of the alleged Trump birthday message, its tone and placement alongside other tributes to Epstein raise new questions about the former president’s comfort level with Epstein’s inner circle. Despite repeated denials over the years about the depth of their relationship, this kind of handwritten, personal letter suggests a familiarity that goes far beyond casual acquaintance. Clinton has not publicly commented on the letter’s contents or context, but its existence reinforces long-standing concerns about his proximity to one of the most notorious sex traffickers in modern American history. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Bill Clinton sent 'warm and gushing' letter for Jeffrey Epstein's 50th birthday - as Trump sues over claim he also wrote a 'bawdy' note for paedophile's half-century | Daily Mail Online Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…

1 Donald Trump Files A 10 Billion Dollar Lawsuit Against The WSJ For Their Jeffrey Epstein Story (7/20/25) 13:05
13:05
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked13:05
Donald Trump has filed a defamation lawsuit seeking at least $10 billion in damages against the Wall Street Journal, its publisher Dow Jones/News Corp, media mogul Rupert Murdoch, and two Journal reporters. The suit, lodged in federal court in Miami on July 18, 2025, targets a WSJ report asserting Trump sent a “bawdy” 2003 birthday letter to Jeffrey Epstein, complete with a crude drawing of a naked woman and suggestive text bearing his signature. Trump adamantly denies any involvement, labeling the article “fake,” and accuses the Journal of reckless reporting, failing to verify whether it even saw the original letter. Legal experts say Trump faces a steep climb: to win as a public figure, he must prove “actual malice” — that the Journal knowingly published false information or acted with reckless disregard for the truth. The lawsuit is historic: if successful, its $10 billion award would dwarf past defamation payouts. Critics warn it could have a chilling effect on press freedom. Meanwhile, Trump’s attorneys argue the story caused “overwhelming” harm to his reputation and finances to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Trump files lawsuit over Wall Street Journal's Jeffrey Epstein report - CBS News Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…

1 Mega Edition: The OIG Report On Jeffrey Epstein's Non Prosecution Agreement (Parts 58-59) (7/20/25) 23:20
23:20
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked23:20
The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence. Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: dl (justice.gov) Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…

1 Mega Edition: The OIG Report On Jeffrey Epstein's Non Prosecution Agreement (Parts 56-57) (7/20/25) 21:46
21:46
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked21:46
The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence. Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: dl (justice.gov) Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…

1 Mega Edition: The OIG Report On Jeffrey Epstein's Non Prosecution Agreement (Parts 54-55) (7/19/25) 26:47
26:47
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked26:47
The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence. Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: dl (justice.gov) Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…

1 Ghislaine Maxwell's Nephew Gets A Job At The Clinton State Department 23:59
23:59
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked23:59
Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell were fast friends with the Clinton and the more news that comes out to support that, it is becoming increasingly difficult for the legacy media to make excuses about why they haven't given The Clinton's and their relationship with Epstein the type of look it deserves. From 17 trips to the white house, to vacations at Zorro ranch to getting your nephew a job at Hillary Clintons state department, it's undeniable that the relationship between the Clintons and Epstein and Maxwell is a lot more than has been reported. (Commercial at 11:39) To contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: https://www.thedailybeast.com/hillary-clinton-gave-state-department-job-to-epstein-madam-ghislaine-maxwells-nephew-says-report Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…

1 Bill Clinton, Jeffrey Epstein and The Shared Hotel Suite 39:34
39:34
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked39:34
Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton were a lot closer than most people know or understand. From all kinds of financial "donations" to Clinton, to visits to various properties to being invited to Chelsea Clinton's wedding, you'd have to be blind or playing serious partisan politics to not see how deep the ties run between the Clinton's and Epstein and Maxwell. Yet, there has not been no serious investigation (that we are aware of) into the relationship Epstein and Clinton shared and nobody has even bothered to call out his spokesperson for the canned statement he continues to offer. Hopefully, after these new revelations, the legacy media will re-evaluate their position and dive into the deep end instead of just checking the water temperature with their finely manicured toes. (commercial at 26:49) To contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: https://www.thedailybeast.com/epstein-shared-hotel-room-with-bill-clinton-and-was-terrified-of-being-poisoned-says-victim-juliette-bryant Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…

1 Bill Clinton And The Trips To China And Taiwan With Ghislaine And Jeffrey 33:36
33:36
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked33:36
For some reason the legacy media in America has decided, for the most part, to not explore the relationship between Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein and the Clintons even though there are mountains of evidence connecting the two. In this episode, we hear yet another tale of the fellow travelers known as Bill Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein. (commercial at 20:02) To contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9789355/amp/Bill-Clinton-took-TWO-trips-Jeffrey-Epstein-Ghislaine-Maxwell.html Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…

1 Ghislaine Maxwell, The Terramar Project And The Clinton's 17:10
17:10
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked17:10
Ghislaine Maxwell launched the TerraMar Project in 2012 as a nonprofit organization focused on ocean conservation, promoting a vision of a borderless oceanic community. Despite its high-profile branding and appearances at global events, including presentations linked to the Clinton Global Initiative, TerraMar never conducted any significant conservation work, issued no grants, and relied almost entirely on loans from Maxwell herself. The organization was more visible in elite social circles than in environmental efforts, leading critics to view it as a vanity project or reputational shield rather than a functional charity. Maxwell's connection to the Clintons added another layer of scrutiny, as she attended events alongside Chelsea Clinton and aligned TerraMar rhetorically with the Clinton Foundation’s global agenda. Though there is no direct evidence of wrongdoing involving the Clintons, the association raised questions once Maxwell’s ties to Jeffrey Epstein became the focus of federal investigations. Following Epstein’s arrest in 2019, Maxwell abruptly shut down the TerraMar Project, prompting speculation that the organization may have been used to launder image rather than create impact. The swift closure only intensified suspicions that TerraMar was less about protecting the oceans and more about maintaining proximity to power. (commercial at 13:41) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/14/style/ghislaine-maxwell-terramar-boats-jeffrey-epstein.html Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 Bill Clinton Is Revealed As John Doe 36 In The Epstein Document Dump 17:34
17:34
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked17:34
Can you hear me now? That's the question that I have for the legacy media that has consistently protected Bill Clinton when it comes to his deep ties to Jeffrey Epstein. For over four years we have stood on this mountain top shouting into the wind about Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton and now, finally, after years of tooth and nail struggles, we are about to get the receipts. According to reports, Bill Clinton AKA John Doe 36 will be named over FIFTY times in the court documents that are expected to be unsealed this coming week when the documents hit the docket and once that happens, we will dive into the whole entire lot of them. One thing is for sure: Bill Clinton is now on the clock. (commercial at 10:28) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Bill Clinton 'will be named as John Doe 36' when a list of Jeffrey Epstein associates from court filings are made public next week | Daily Mail Online Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 Jeffrey Epstein And His Attempt To Secure Bail In 2019 (Part 3) (7/19/25) 16:44
16:44
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked16:44
In a letter dated July 11, 2019, defense attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein wrote to Judge Richard M. Berman of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York to formally request pretrial release for Epstein. They referenced the criminal case United States v. Jeffrey Epstein, No. 19-490, and sought to justify bail by presenting a proposed package of conditions they argued would mitigate both flight risk and any potential danger Epstein was alleged to pose to the public. The letter asserted that the proposed terms of release would be stringent and comprehensive, designed specifically to ensure Epstein’s full compliance with court orders. While the details of those conditions were to follow in the broader bail application, this initial correspondence served to lay the foundation for Epstein’s legal team to argue that incarceration prior to trial was unnecessary, and that he could safely remain in the community under strict supervision. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Epstein-bail.pdf Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 Jeffrey Epstein And His Attempt To Secure Bail In 2019 (Part 2) (7/19/25) 14:35
14:35
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked14:35
In a letter dated July 11, 2019, defense attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein wrote to Judge Richard M. Berman of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York to formally request pretrial release for Epstein. They referenced the criminal case United States v. Jeffrey Epstein, No. 19-490, and sought to justify bail by presenting a proposed package of conditions they argued would mitigate both flight risk and any potential danger Epstein was alleged to pose to the public. The letter asserted that the proposed terms of release would be stringent and comprehensive, designed specifically to ensure Epstein’s full compliance with court orders. While the details of those conditions were to follow in the broader bail application, this initial correspondence served to lay the foundation for Epstein’s legal team to argue that incarceration prior to trial was unnecessary, and that he could safely remain in the community under strict supervision. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Epstein-bail.pdf Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 Jeffrey Epstein And His Attempt To Secure Bail In 2019 (Part 1) (7/19/25) 12:35
12:35
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked12:35
In a letter dated July 11, 2019, defense attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein wrote to Judge Richard M. Berman of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York to formally request pretrial release for Epstein. They referenced the criminal case United States v. Jeffrey Epstein, No. 19-490, and sought to justify bail by presenting a proposed package of conditions they argued would mitigate both flight risk and any potential danger Epstein was alleged to pose to the public. The letter asserted that the proposed terms of release would be stringent and comprehensive, designed specifically to ensure Epstein’s full compliance with court orders. While the details of those conditions were to follow in the broader bail application, this initial correspondence served to lay the foundation for Epstein’s legal team to argue that incarceration prior to trial was unnecessary, and that he could safely remain in the community under strict supervision. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Epstein-bail.pdf Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 The DOJ Has Requested The Epstein Grand Jury Documents Be Unsealed. What Happens Next? (7/19/25) 20:09
20:09
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked20:09
The process of unsealing federal grand jury records is deliberately difficult, wrapped in layers of legal insulation under Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Only a federal judge—not the President, not the Attorney General—can authorize disclosure, and even then, only if the requester demonstrates a “particularized need” that outweighs the default presumption of secrecy. Motions must be surgically precise, narrowly tailored, and supported by compelling legal justification. Even successful requests often result in redacted or restricted disclosures, not public transparency. The system is built to prioritize protection over exposure, and accountability often takes a backseat to process. While the courts claim this structure safeguards the integrity of justice, it frequently appears to serve power over truth—especially when politically sensitive material is involved. The legal mechanisms for disclosure exist on paper but function in reality as bureaucratic gatekeeping. Victims, journalists, and the public are told they can seek access, but few ever get it—and fewer still get anything meaningful. The result is a growing skepticism: that secrecy has become less about shielding the innocent and more about shielding the institution itself. The question is, will the courts continue to protect that secrecy at all costs, or will the demand for real transparency finally break through? to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 Mega Edition: The OIG Report On Jeffrey Epstein's Non Prosecution Agreement (Parts 52-53) (7/19/25) 28:33
28:33
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked28:33
The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence. Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: dl (justice.gov) Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 Mega Edition: The OIG Report On Jeffrey Epstein's Non Prosecution Agreement (Parts 50-51) (7/19/25) 23:20
23:20
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked23:20
The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence. Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: dl (justice.gov) Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 Mega Edition: The OIG Report On Jeffrey Epstein's Non Prosecution Agreement (Parts 48-49) (7/19/25) 26:24
26:24
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked26:24
The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence. Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: dl (justice.gov) Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 Jeffrey Epstein And The Unsealed Grand Jury Documents From Florida (Part 11-12) 21:43
21:43
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked21:43
The once-sealed grand jury documents in the Jeffrey Epstein case revealed exactly what many had long suspected—that the original charges brought in Palm Beach bore little resemblance to the overwhelming evidence collected by law enforcement. Despite police uncovering more than 30 underage victims and compiling a mountain of corroborated, disturbing testimony, the grand jury returned a single, watered-down charge of solicitation of prostitution, and not even of a minor. The documents confirmed that critical witness statements and police findings were deliberately excluded from the process, raising serious questions about whether the grand jury was ever given a fair opportunity to pursue real justice. Local prosecutors, under State Attorney Barry Krischer, appeared more interested in shielding Epstein than prosecuting him, undermining the very purpose of the grand jury by controlling what they saw and what they didn’t. Even more disturbing was the years-long effort by local authorities to keep these documents hidden from the public. Journalists and advocates had to wage an extended legal battle just to unseal records that should have been transparent from the beginning—records that exposed how deeply the process was manipulated. Palm Beach officials fought the release at every turn, citing flimsy justifications and procedural red tape while ignoring the public’s right to know how justice was subverted. Their resistance wasn’t just bureaucratic—it was a calculated attempt to conceal their own complicity in one of the most disgraceful prosecutorial failures in recent memory. And when the documents finally did come out, they made one thing clear: the cover-up didn’t start in Washington. It started right there in Palm Beach. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Epstein transcripts - DocumentCloud Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 Jeffrey Epstein And The Unsealed Grand Jury Documents From Florida (Part 7-8) 24:58
24:58
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked24:58
The once-sealed grand jury documents in the Jeffrey Epstein case revealed exactly what many had long suspected—that the original charges brought in Palm Beach bore little resemblance to the overwhelming evidence collected by law enforcement. Despite police uncovering more than 30 underage victims and compiling a mountain of corroborated, disturbing testimony, the grand jury returned a single, watered-down charge of solicitation of prostitution, and not even of a minor. The documents confirmed that critical witness statements and police findings were deliberately excluded from the process, raising serious questions about whether the grand jury was ever given a fair opportunity to pursue real justice. Local prosecutors, under State Attorney Barry Krischer, appeared more interested in shielding Epstein than prosecuting him, undermining the very purpose of the grand jury by controlling what they saw and what they didn’t. Even more disturbing was the years-long effort by local authorities to keep these documents hidden from the public. Journalists and advocates had to wage an extended legal battle just to unseal records that should have been transparent from the beginning—records that exposed how deeply the process was manipulated. Palm Beach officials fought the release at every turn, citing flimsy justifications and procedural red tape while ignoring the public’s right to know how justice was subverted. Their resistance wasn’t just bureaucratic—it was a calculated attempt to conceal their own complicity in one of the most disgraceful prosecutorial failures in recent memory. And when the documents finally did come out, they made one thing clear: the cover-up didn’t start in Washington. It started right there in Palm Beach. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Epstein transcripts - DocumentCloud Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 Jeffrey Epstein And The Unsealed Grand Jury Documents From Florida (Part 9-10) 34:27
34:27
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked34:27
The once-sealed grand jury documents in the Jeffrey Epstein case revealed exactly what many had long suspected—that the original charges brought in Palm Beach bore little resemblance to the overwhelming evidence collected by law enforcement. Despite police uncovering more than 30 underage victims and compiling a mountain of corroborated, disturbing testimony, the grand jury returned a single, watered-down charge of solicitation of prostitution, and not even of a minor. The documents confirmed that critical witness statements and police findings were deliberately excluded from the process, raising serious questions about whether the grand jury was ever given a fair opportunity to pursue real justice. Local prosecutors, under State Attorney Barry Krischer, appeared more interested in shielding Epstein than prosecuting him, undermining the very purpose of the grand jury by controlling what they saw and what they didn’t. Even more disturbing was the years-long effort by local authorities to keep these documents hidden from the public. Journalists and advocates had to wage an extended legal battle just to unseal records that should have been transparent from the beginning—records that exposed how deeply the process was manipulated. Palm Beach officials fought the release at every turn, citing flimsy justifications and procedural red tape while ignoring the public’s right to know how justice was subverted. Their resistance wasn’t just bureaucratic—it was a calculated attempt to conceal their own complicity in one of the most disgraceful prosecutorial failures in recent memory. And when the documents finally did come out, they made one thing clear: the cover-up didn’t start in Washington. It started right there in Palm Beach. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Epstein transcripts - DocumentCloud Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 The Ridiculous Terms Of Jeffrey Epstein's Probation 18:05
18:05
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked18:05
Jeffrey Epstein’s probation terms following his 2008 conviction were astonishingly lenient, especially given the gravity of the charges. Despite being labeled a sex offender, Epstein was allowed to serve just 13 months of an 18-month sentence in a private wing of the Palm Beach County Jail, with most of that time spent outside the facility under a “work release” privilege. He was permitted to leave the jail for up to 12 hours a day, six days a week, supposedly for professional obligations—an arrangement virtually unheard of for registered sex offenders. During these hours, Epstein operated from a private office where he allegedly continued to receive young female visitors, all while being “supervised” by deputies who largely looked the other way. The terms of his probation were equally toothless. Epstein was granted permission to travel extensively between his residences in New York, Florida, and the U.S. Virgin Islands with minimal oversight. He was required to register as a sex offender, but compliance was inconsistent and, in some jurisdictions, poorly enforced. He didn’t wear an ankle monitor, and his communications and finances were largely unmonitored, allowing him to continue managing his wealth and potentially facilitating further abuse. In effect, the probation conditions seemed tailored not to restrict Epstein, but to preserve his lifestyle—highlighting a justice system that bent over backward to accommodate a wealthy predator while failing the dozens of girls he had exploited. Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 Prince Andrew And The Infamous Email He Sent To Ghislaine Maxwell 23:46
23:46
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked23:46
In a now-publicized email from 2015, Prince Andrew wrote to Ghislaine Maxwell inquiring specifically about Virginia Roberts (now Virginia Giuffre), the woman who had publicly accused him of sexual abuse tied to Jeffrey Epstein's trafficking operation. The email, sent shortly after Roberts' allegations were made public, read: “Let me know when we can talk. Got some specific questions to ask you about Virginia Roberts.” The tone was casual, but the implication was clear—he was seeking information or clarification from Maxwell, who had long served as Epstein’s close associate and alleged co-conspirator in grooming underage girls. This email undermined Prince Andrew’s later claims of having no meaningful recollection of Virginia Roberts or the events she described. It showed that he not only knew of her existence, but was actively discussing her with Maxwell behind the scenes as legal scrutiny mounted. The correspondence was used to highlight inconsistencies in his public denials and cast further doubt on his defense, suggesting a coordinated effort to manage damage and control the narrative around Roberts’ accusations. To contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com Source: https://www.tatler.com/article/prince-andrew-asked-ghislaine-maxwell-for-information-about-virginia-roberts-giuffre-newly-released-deposition Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 Jeffrey Epstein's Estate And The Missing 13 Million Dollars 16:20
16:20
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked16:20
Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn and the estate of Jeffrey Epstein has been accused by the USVI AG of moving over 13 million dollars into accounts of their own. The battle between Denise George and the estate has been raging for several years now, but this is certainly an escalation. (commercial at 8:19) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/22/business/jeffrey-epstein-estate-assets.html Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 Murder In Moscow: Judge Hippler Has Lifted The Gag Order (7/18/25) 11:21
11:21
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked11:21
Judge Steven Hippler issued an order lifting the gag order in the Bryan Kohberger case, stating that its original purpose—to protect Kohberger’s right to a fair trial—was no longer valid following his guilty plea. With no jury trial forthcoming, the judge determined that the restrictions on speech could no longer be justified. He emphasized that lifting the gag order did not force any party to speak but simply restored their First Amendment right to do so if they chose. The order acknowledged the public’s strong interest in transparency and access to information now that the criminal case had effectively moved past the trial phase. Despite objections from Kohberger’s defense, who argued that media attention could influence the sentencing phase, the judge made clear that such publicity was inevitable regardless of the gag order’s status. He dismissed the notion that continuing to silence participants would shield the process from public scrutiny. However, the judge declined to immediately unseal the more than 240 court filings that remain sealed in the case, saying he would review them individually after the upcoming sentencing hearing. The decision marks a shift toward greater openness in one of the most closely watched murder cases in recent memory. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Prosecutors reverse position on gag order after Kohberger murder confession | Fox News Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 Jeffrey Epstein Continued To Abuse Girls Even While Under The Custody And Care Of Florida (7/18/25) 12:53
12:53
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked12:53
Despite being convicted in 2008 and sentenced to 18 months in a Florida county jail, Jeffrey Epstein was granted extraordinary privileges under a controversial work-release arrangement approved by the Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office. For up to 12 hours a day, six days a week, Epstein was allowed to leave jail and report to a private office space in West Palm Beach. During this period—when he was technically in state custody—multiple allegations surfaced that Epstein continued to abuse young women and girls under the guise of “massage sessions” at that office. Witnesses later stated that he had girls brought to him during these work-release hours, sometimes with deputies stationed outside or nearby, turning what should have been incarceration into an extension of his trafficking operation. These claims, backed by sworn statements and later confirmed in various investigative reports, suggest that Epstein’s sentencing was functionally meaningless in practice. Jail logs, visitor records, and civil testimony point to a steady stream of female visitors, including some minors, during his time on work release. Reports also indicate that Epstein had access to the internet, was allowed unsupervised time, and even had his private driver pick up guests. Critics argue that the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office and state officials failed catastrophically in their duty to ensure he was actually being punished. Instead, they allowed a convicted sex offender to continue exploiting girls under state watch—raising lasting questions about how far Epstein’s influence extended into law enforcement and public institutions. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Jeffrey Epstein preyed on women during jail sentence, forced victim to marry woman, lawsuits allege Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 Trump Moves to Unseal Epstein Grand Jury Records: A Real Shift or Optics? (7/18/25) 21:39
21:39
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked21:39
Donald Trump has instructed Attorney General Pam Bondi to request the unsealing of federal grand jury documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. The move follows mounting public interest and skepticism surrounding the government’s handling of the case, particularly after the DOJ declared the Epstein matter closed and reiterated that no “client list” exists. Trump framed the decision as a step toward transparency, stating it would help end speculation and restore public trust. Bondi responded that she is prepared to move quickly to file the appropriate motions in court. While the directive represents a notable shift in approach, the actual impact of releasing grand jury materials remains uncertain. Such records are typically subject to strict legal protections and, even if unsealed, may contain redactions or limited information. The release could shed light on previously undisclosed aspects of the case, but by itself, it may not address broader questions surrounding Epstein’s network, co-conspirators, or institutional failures. As a standalone action, it opens the door to further scrutiny but does not guarantee meaningful new revelations unless followed by deeper, sustained investigative efforts. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Bondi says she'll try to unseal Epstein grand jury records - ABC News Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 The Alleged Trump-Epstein Birthday Card: Real Note or Media Mirage? (7/18/25) 18:52
18:52
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked18:52
In 2003, Ghislaine Maxwell reportedly compiled a leather-bound birthday album for Jeffrey Epstein, soliciting messages from his circle. The Wall Street Journal claims that one of those letters, signed “Donald,” includes a bawdy, hand-drawn sketch of a naked woman and a typewritten pseudodialogue between “Donald” and “Jeffrey.” It ends with a cheeky wish: “may every day be another wonderful secret.” The Journal also notes that the Department of Justice reviewed the letter during its Epstein investigation. However, the provenance of the document—how the Journal accessed it, whether any forensic or typographic analysis was performed—and the handling of DOJ sources remain murky. Before drawing firm conclusions, these gaps warrant further scrutiny. Trump and his allies vehemently dispute the letter’s authenticity, labeling it a “fake” and threatening lawsuits. The White House has stated the Journal never produced the actual document for verification, and Vice President Vance dismissed the report as “complete and utter bullshit.” Critics argue this leaves the story in limbo—neither confirmed nor debunked. The timing is also notable, coinciding with Trump's push to release Epstein-era grand jury files. In the absence of physical evidence or corroborating testimony, the report raises intriguing questions about Trump’s relationship with Epstein—but so far it remains circumstantial, not definitive. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Jeffrey Epstein’s Friends Sent Him Bawdy Letters for a 50th Birthday Album. One Was From Donald Trump. Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 Surviving Jeffrey Epstein: Teala Davies (7/18/25) 11:24
11:24
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked11:24
Teala Davies alleges that Jeffrey Epstein sexually abused her beginning when she was 17 years old, after luring her in under the guise of offering support and mentorship. She claims Epstein flew her around the world on his private jet and brought her to his properties in New York, New Mexico, Florida, Paris, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, where the abuse took place repeatedly. Davies says the sexual abuse was not only frequent but psychologically damaging, leaving her with lasting trauma and a sense of dependence that made it difficult to escape. Davies also alleges that Epstein transported her internationally as part of his trafficking network, presenting her as part of his entourage while continuing the abuse behind closed doors. She says the relationship was marked by coercion rather than consent, and that she experienced ongoing trauma as a result. Her legal complaint outlines long-term emotional damage, citing flashbacks, dissociation, and a persistent fear of retaliation. She has stated that the abuse only stopped when Epstein abruptly severed ties with her, leaving her to deal with the psychological wreckage on her own. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Jeffrey Epstein photo: Alleged teen victim Teala Davies seen with Epstein in helicopter flying over U.S. Virgin Islands - CBS News Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 Mega Edition: The OIG Report On Jeffrey Epstein's Non Prosecution Agreement (Parts 46-47) (7/18/25) 27:14
27:14
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked27:14
The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence. Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: dl (justice.gov) Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 Mega Edition: The OIG Report On Jeffrey Epstein's Non Prosecution Agreement (Parts 44-45) (7/18/25) 23:48
23:48
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked23:48
The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence. Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: dl (justice.gov) Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 Jeffrey Epstein And The Unsealed Grand Jury Documents From Florida (Part 5-6) 27:52
27:52
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked27:52
The once-sealed grand jury documents in the Jeffrey Epstein case revealed exactly what many had long suspected—that the original charges brought in Palm Beach bore little resemblance to the overwhelming evidence collected by law enforcement. Despite police uncovering more than 30 underage victims and compiling a mountain of corroborated, disturbing testimony, the grand jury returned a single, watered-down charge of solicitation of prostitution, and not even of a minor. The documents confirmed that critical witness statements and police findings were deliberately excluded from the process, raising serious questions about whether the grand jury was ever given a fair opportunity to pursue real justice. Local prosecutors, under State Attorney Barry Krischer, appeared more interested in shielding Epstein than prosecuting him, undermining the very purpose of the grand jury by controlling what they saw and what they didn’t. Even more disturbing was the years-long effort by local authorities to keep these documents hidden from the public. Journalists and advocates had to wage an extended legal battle just to unseal records that should have been transparent from the beginning—records that exposed how deeply the process was manipulated. Palm Beach officials fought the release at every turn, citing flimsy justifications and procedural red tape while ignoring the public’s right to know how justice was subverted. Their resistance wasn’t just bureaucratic—it was a calculated attempt to conceal their own complicity in one of the most disgraceful prosecutorial failures in recent memory. And when the documents finally did come out, they made one thing clear: the cover-up didn’t start in Washington. It started right there in Palm Beach. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Epstein transcripts - DocumentCloud Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 Jeffrey Epstein And The Unsealed Grand Jury Documents From Florida (Part 3-4) 28:56
28:56
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked28:56
The once-sealed grand jury documents in the Jeffrey Epstein case revealed exactly what many had long suspected—that the original charges brought in Palm Beach bore little resemblance to the overwhelming evidence collected by law enforcement. Despite police uncovering more than 30 underage victims and compiling a mountain of corroborated, disturbing testimony, the grand jury returned a single, watered-down charge of solicitation of prostitution, and not even of a minor. The documents confirmed that critical witness statements and police findings were deliberately excluded from the process, raising serious questions about whether the grand jury was ever given a fair opportunity to pursue real justice. Local prosecutors, under State Attorney Barry Krischer, appeared more interested in shielding Epstein than prosecuting him, undermining the very purpose of the grand jury by controlling what they saw and what they didn’t. Even more disturbing was the years-long effort by local authorities to keep these documents hidden from the public. Journalists and advocates had to wage an extended legal battle just to unseal records that should have been transparent from the beginning—records that exposed how deeply the process was manipulated. Palm Beach officials fought the release at every turn, citing flimsy justifications and procedural red tape while ignoring the public’s right to know how justice was subverted. Their resistance wasn’t just bureaucratic—it was a calculated attempt to conceal their own complicity in one of the most disgraceful prosecutorial failures in recent memory. And when the documents finally did come out, they made one thing clear: the cover-up didn’t start in Washington. It started right there in Palm Beach. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Epstein transcripts - DocumentCloud Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 Jeffrey Epstein And The Unsealed Grand Jury Documents From Florida (Part 1-2) 26:10
26:10
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked26:10
The once-sealed grand jury documents in the Jeffrey Epstein case revealed exactly what many had long suspected—that the original charges brought in Palm Beach bore little resemblance to the overwhelming evidence collected by law enforcement. Despite police uncovering more than 30 underage victims and compiling a mountain of corroborated, disturbing testimony, the grand jury returned a single, watered-down charge of solicitation of prostitution, and not even of a minor. The documents confirmed that critical witness statements and police findings were deliberately excluded from the process, raising serious questions about whether the grand jury was ever given a fair opportunity to pursue real justice. Local prosecutors, under State Attorney Barry Krischer, appeared more interested in shielding Epstein than prosecuting him, undermining the very purpose of the grand jury by controlling what they saw and what they didn’t. Even more disturbing was the years-long effort by local authorities to keep these documents hidden from the public. Journalists and advocates had to wage an extended legal battle just to unseal records that should have been transparent from the beginning—records that exposed how deeply the process was manipulated. Palm Beach officials fought the release at every turn, citing flimsy justifications and procedural red tape while ignoring the public’s right to know how justice was subverted. Their resistance wasn’t just bureaucratic—it was a calculated attempt to conceal their own complicity in one of the most disgraceful prosecutorial failures in recent memory. And when the documents finally did come out, they made one thing clear: the cover-up didn’t start in Washington. It started right there in Palm Beach. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Epstein transcripts - DocumentCloud Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 Ghislaine Maxwell And Jeffrey Epstein Didn't Work Alone 27:48
27:48
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked27:48
Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein did not operate in isolation—they relied on a network. Their crimes were made possible by a web of enablers, facilitators, fixers, and bystanders who either helped directly or looked the other way. From private pilots to personal assistants, house managers to recruiters, there were people in their orbit who scheduled, transported, housed, and in some cases, groomed young girls for abuse. These weren’t random helpers—they were staff, associates, and colleagues who made Epstein and Maxwell’s operation function like a well-oiled machine. Yet, most of them have never faced a single charge. Their silence, compliance, and active participation were just as essential as the actions of Epstein and Maxwell themselves. Equally complicit were the institutions that protected them. Wealth managers, elite schools, banks, law firms, and even prosecutors played roles—some by omission, others by design. Doors opened for Epstein and Maxwell that would have slammed shut on anyone without money and connections. Social circles embraced them long after rumors had become accusations, and long after accusations had become evidence. And still, they were given platforms, invitations, and cover. This wasn’t a case of two people fooling the world—it was a case of the world choosing not to care. The myth of the “lone predator” serves power well, but the truth is always more uncomfortable: predators thrive in systems that help them. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10332169/Underage-orgies-possible-pregnancy-key-moments-Ghislaine-Maxwells-sensational-trial.html Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 How Ghislaine Maxwell And Jeffrey Epstein Exploited A Class Divide 27:13
27:13
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked27:13
Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein systematically exploited the class divide to identify, groom, and traffic vulnerable girls who lacked the social capital, financial resources, or legal protection to fight back. They deliberately targeted young women from economically disadvantaged backgrounds—many of them minors—offering them small amounts of money, promises of education, or social advancement in exchange for massages that quickly escalated into sexual abuse. Epstein’s wealth and Maxwell’s aristocratic veneer allowed them to present a façade of opportunity, while in reality, they were preying on desperation and lack of options. The imbalance of power was not incidental—it was the very mechanism of their crimes. At the same time, their wealth and elite social connections gave them near-total immunity in the circles they moved in. Maxwell, the daughter of a media mogul, and Epstein, a financier with access to billionaires, royalty, and world leaders, used their status to insulate themselves from scrutiny. Victims were dismissed as unreliable or unworthy of belief, while Maxwell and Epstein were protected by institutions more interested in preserving reputations than seeking justice. The class divide not only enabled the abuse—it silenced the aftermath. The girls were disposable. The predators were untouchable. To contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com Source: https://www.ft.com/content/0b9d93da-1687-4eb1-bd53-0a84a1b40dff Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 Murder In Moscow: Bryan Kohberger, Madison Mogen And The Motive For Murder (7/17/25) 12:06
12:06
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked12:06
James Patterson’s new book, The Idaho Four: An American Tragedy, offers a detailed and emotionally charged narrative of the 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students—Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin. The book reconstructs the victims' final hours and the immediate aftermath of the killings, weaving together personal details about their lives, relationships, and the horror of what took place inside their off-campus home. Patterson brings readers inside the crime scene, the families’ heartbreak, and the small-town panic that erupted as police struggled to explain the brutality of what had occurred. The second half of the book zeroes in on Bryan Kohberger, the man who ultimately pleaded guilty to the murders. Patterson paints a chilling profile of a socially alienated criminology student who studied the psychology of killers and believed he could execute the perfect crime. The narrative follows how Kohberger’s mistakes—especially leaving behind a knife sheath—led to a meticulous investigation that unraveled his plan. Combining investigative detail with fast-paced storytelling, the book challenges readers to weigh the evidence for themselves, positioning them as the jury in a case that still echoes with unanswered questions and shattered lives. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: New book on University of Idaho murders sheds light on Bryan Kohberger's potential motive - ABC News Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 Surviving Jeffrey Epstein: Jennifer Araoz (Part 2) (7/17/25) 22:47
22:47
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked22:47
Jennifer Araoz alleged that Jeffrey Epstein began grooming her when she was just 14 years old, after one of his female recruiters approached her outside her New York City high school. Araoz claimed the recruiter slowly built trust, inviting her to Epstein’s mansion under the guise of mentorship and financial assistance. Over several visits, Araoz says she was manipulated into giving Epstein massages while wearing only her underwear, and eventually, those encounters escalated into full sexual assaults. She described being paid hundreds of dollars after each incident, reinforcing the transactional and coercive nature of the abuse. By the time she was 15, Araoz alleges that Epstein forcibly raped her during one of those visits. She recalls being paralyzed with fear, crying and begging him to stop, while he overpowered her. Afterward, he handed her money and continued to manipulate her into silence, using his power and the threat of isolation to keep her from speaking out. Araoz later dropped out of school due to the emotional toll of the abuse. She eventually filed a lawsuit against Epstein’s estate, his employees, and also named individuals and institutions she believed enabled the abuse by failing to protect her. Her account underscores the deliberate, calculated way Epstein preyed on underage girls—using female recruiters, financial coercion, and institutional neglect to shield himself from consequences for years. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: New Jeffrey Epstein accuser: He raped me when I was 15 Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 Surviving Jeffrey Epstein: Jennifer Araoz (Part 1) (7/17/25) 13:15
13:15
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked13:15
Jennifer Araoz alleged that Jeffrey Epstein began grooming her when she was just 14 years old, after one of his female recruiters approached her outside her New York City high school. Araoz claimed the recruiter slowly built trust, inviting her to Epstein’s mansion under the guise of mentorship and financial assistance. Over several visits, Araoz says she was manipulated into giving Epstein massages while wearing only her underwear, and eventually, those encounters escalated into full sexual assaults. She described being paid hundreds of dollars after each incident, reinforcing the transactional and coercive nature of the abuse. By the time she was 15, Araoz alleges that Epstein forcibly raped her during one of those visits. She recalls being paralyzed with fear, crying and begging him to stop, while he overpowered her. Afterward, he handed her money and continued to manipulate her into silence, using his power and the threat of isolation to keep her from speaking out. Araoz later dropped out of school due to the emotional toll of the abuse. She eventually filed a lawsuit against Epstein’s estate, his employees, and also named individuals and institutions she believed enabled the abuse by failing to protect her. Her account underscores the deliberate, calculated way Epstein preyed on underage girls—using female recruiters, financial coercion, and institutional neglect to shield himself from consequences for years. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: New Jeffrey Epstein accuser: He raped me when I was 15 Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 Maureen Comey Has Been Fired In The Wake Of The Diddy Trial And Blowback Over Epstein (7/17/25) 13:51
13:51
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked13:51
Maureen Comey, a federal prosecutor and daughter of former FBI Director James Comey, was recently removed from her position following a series of high-profile prosecutorial failures, most notably her handling of the Sean “Diddy” Combs case and the ongoing fallout from the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. In the Diddy case, despite mounting public allegations, corroborating testimony, and a sprawling federal investigation, Comey failed to secure a conviction on key charges—prompting criticism from within the DOJ and from the public, who viewed it as yet another instance of the wealthy and powerful skirting justice. Her role in the Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell matters had already drawn skepticism, particularly over the slow pace of disclosures and missing evidence. Combined, these failures painted a picture of a prosecutor either unwilling or unable to push cases against elite defendants across the finish line. Comey's dismissal is being viewed by many as symbolic of a broader institutional failure. For years, she was positioned as a central figure in prosecutions that promised accountability for Epstein’s network of enablers, yet few meaningful outcomes followed. The fact that she is now gone—without fanfare, without accountability, and without explanation—only fuels suspicions that her presence was more about containment than prosecution. Her firing doesn’t feel like justice—it feels like an after-the-fact cleanup, a quiet reshuffling meant to relieve pressure while continuing to protect the same circles that have evaded consequences all along. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: DOJ fires Maurene Comey, daughter of James Comey and a prosecutor in Sean Combs' and Ghislaine Maxwell's cases Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
Welcome to Player FM!
Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.