Rico, Rico: How Diddy's Fate Hangs on a Simple Question

The Flo Show, no filter

Send us a text

The tense atmosphere of jury deliberations in Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal trial revealed itself dramatically when, just 70 minutes after beginning their work, the jury sent a note to Judge Aaron Subramani stating that "juror number 25 is not able to follow instructions." This immediate conflict suggests a jury that may already be leaning toward a decision, with one holdout potentially disrupting their process.
What followed was even more revealing – a second note asking the pivotal question: "If an individual asks for a controlled substance and the person hands it over, is it distribution?" This technical inquiry strikes at the heart of one of the predicated acts required for a RICO conviction. When prosecutor Maureen Comey confidently stated the answer should be "yes," it signaled potential trouble for Diddy's defense.
The jury's focus on legal technicalities rather than emotional arguments demonstrates their commitment to applying the law precisely to the evidence presented. Throughout the trial, prosecutors laid out numerous alleged predicated acts that could support a RICO conviction – from bribery involving a $100,000 payment for surveillance footage to allegations of forced labor where individuals were coerced into participating in "freak-offs" through threats and manipulation. Additional evidence pointed to sex trafficking and extortion.
Perhaps most telling was the complete absence of character witnesses for Diddy. Not one person – family member, friend, or business associate – took the stand to testify to his character, creating a deafening silence that speaks volumes about his relationships and reputation among those who know him best.
As deliberations continue, the jury's methodical approach suggests they're carefully examining whether Diddy's actions meet the specific legal definitions required for conviction. If the judge confirms that handing someone drugs constitutes distribution under the law, it could provide the jury with another predicated act needed for a RICO conviction, potentially sealing what one commentator called "the most Rico-est Rico that ever Rico'd."
Ready to dive deeper into high-profile trials and cultural analysis? Subscribe, share your thoughts, and join our community of critical thinkers who look beyond the headlines.

here's the link for subscription only content and VIP Diddy trial content!

get a $23 subscription to be added to VIP diddy list

if you already have a subscription, get a "support" subscription on that same page and make up the difference....example if you already have a $10 subscription add a $13 support subscription. all can be dont from link below

The Flo Show, no filter (The Flo Show, no filter +)

thanks!

Support the show

Go to this link to subscribe to my podcast to get all the exclusive podcasts uncovering the celebrity scandals! Diddy/Clive connection! What really happened to Whitney Houston, Aaliyah and more!
https://www.buzzsprout.com/2419432/subscribe
for merch (hoodies, tees etc) go to my shopify linked below!

www.andidontlikeit.com

FOR ANY ISSUES with your subscription please reach out to [email protected] and they will be happy to assist you!
FOR ALL VIDEO VERSIONS OF "THE FLO SHOW NO FILTER" LIVE SUBSCRIBE TO MY PATREON! FloDaddyFlo | "Uncover the Stories Behind the Headlines: Exclusive Celebrity & | Patreon TAP THE LINK!

Chapters

1. Episode Introduction and Disclaimer (00:00:00)

2. Breaking Down Jury Drama and Note (00:05:05)

3. The Crucial Drug Distribution Question (00:12:43)

4. RICO Predicated Acts Against Diddy (00:18:58)

5. Why This Jury's Questions Matter (00:35:16)

6. Diddy's History of Violence Against Women (00:52:44)

7. Celebrity Defenders and Comment Section Battles (01:09:15)

8. Verdict Predictions and Show Closing (01:21:18)