))
Cocktails and Cases
Manage episode 294129400 series 2921504
Content provided by Roy Park and Jason Guenthart. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Roy Park and Jason Guenthart or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
Here are the cases we discuss on this episode:
Garcia v. Mendoza dba Sweet Melody Express, 2020 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS 353
Burden of proof on applicant to prove AOE/COE and residential employees must prove LC 3352 subsection 8 exception does not apply.
Avila v. Sutter Santa Cruz, 2020 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS 413
6 month rule for psyche injuries need not be 6 consecutive months
Li v. Kaiser Permanente, 2020 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS 389
AA's interpreter must prove reasonableness and necessity for their services
Tull v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, 2021 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS 53
Credit can be applied to multiple dates of injury
Rosenbrook v. Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc., 2021 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS 16
If a QME deems a Telehealth appropriate, defendants cannot simply refuse to send applicant
Applied Materials v. WCAB,
Compensable consequence definition expanded and Fitzpatrick upheld
13 episodes
Share
