Artwork

Content provided by Shobita Parthasarathy and Jack Stilgoe. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Shobita Parthasarathy and Jack Stilgoe or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Episode 32

 
Share
 

Manage episode 479407784 series 2534262
Content provided by Shobita Parthasarathy and Jack Stilgoe. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Shobita Parthasarathy and Jack Stilgoe or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.

The Politics of Expertise and Retelling the Story of Racism in the Pulse Oximeter ft. Amy Moran-Thomas

March 19, 2023

TRANSCRIPT

This month, Jack and Shobita talk about the challenges of ensuring that AI and gene editing reflect human values, and reflect on what the recent train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio tells us about the politics of knowledge. And they chat with Amy Moran-Thomas, Associate Professor of Anthropology at MIT, about her clarion call to address the racial biases embedded in the pulse oximeter, at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic in August 2020.

Study Questions:

  1. What are the benefits and risks of sickle cell disease becoming one of the first approved treatments using somatic cell gene editing?

  2. How did early concerns about racial bias in the pulse oximeter get dismissed?

  3. How did the idea that the pulse oximeter had embedded racial bias go from something that was dismissed, to something that is commonly known? In particular, what are the social and political dynamics that affected this process?

  4. How have the definitions of expertise in this case (e.g., who sits on FDA panels) affected how we understand the problem with the pulse oximeter? How could it be understood differently? What kinds of expertise are missing in policymaking related to the pulse oximeter?

  5. What is the problem with framing the pulse oximeter issue as a skin color problem and not a device problem?

  6. What does Moran-Thomas's experience with the pulse oximeter story tell us about how research (especially in the social sciences and humanities) can have impact?

Related links:

  continue reading

57 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 479407784 series 2534262
Content provided by Shobita Parthasarathy and Jack Stilgoe. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Shobita Parthasarathy and Jack Stilgoe or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.

The Politics of Expertise and Retelling the Story of Racism in the Pulse Oximeter ft. Amy Moran-Thomas

March 19, 2023

TRANSCRIPT

This month, Jack and Shobita talk about the challenges of ensuring that AI and gene editing reflect human values, and reflect on what the recent train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio tells us about the politics of knowledge. And they chat with Amy Moran-Thomas, Associate Professor of Anthropology at MIT, about her clarion call to address the racial biases embedded in the pulse oximeter, at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic in August 2020.

Study Questions:

  1. What are the benefits and risks of sickle cell disease becoming one of the first approved treatments using somatic cell gene editing?

  2. How did early concerns about racial bias in the pulse oximeter get dismissed?

  3. How did the idea that the pulse oximeter had embedded racial bias go from something that was dismissed, to something that is commonly known? In particular, what are the social and political dynamics that affected this process?

  4. How have the definitions of expertise in this case (e.g., who sits on FDA panels) affected how we understand the problem with the pulse oximeter? How could it be understood differently? What kinds of expertise are missing in policymaking related to the pulse oximeter?

  5. What is the problem with framing the pulse oximeter issue as a skin color problem and not a device problem?

  6. What does Moran-Thomas's experience with the pulse oximeter story tell us about how research (especially in the social sciences and humanities) can have impact?

Related links:

  continue reading

57 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play