))
In Re: Amazon.com, Inc., Fulfillment Center Fair Labor Standards Act and Wage and Hour Litigation
Manage episode 307216567 series 2896172
Content provided by Corrie Woods. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Corrie Woods or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
Host Corrie Woods interviews fellow appellate attorney Pete Winebrake of Winebrake & Santillo to discuss In Re: Amazon.com, Inc., Fulfillment Center Fair Labor Standards Act and Wage and Hour Litigation (In Re: Amazon) in which SCOPA held that an employee's time spent on an employer's premises awaiting mandatory security screening constitutes time "worked" for purposes of Pennsylvania's Minimum Wage Act, and that the maxim de minimum non curat lex, or, the law does not care for trivialities, does not apply to time worked for purposes of that Act.
Show Notes:
- Justice Todd's Majority Opinion
- Justice Saylor's Dissenting Opinion
- Justice Mundy's Dissenting Opinion
- Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk
- In Re: Amazon Summary and Report
Read more about In Re: Amazon and all of SCOPA's cases on SCOPAblog.
You can help us Raise the Bar for Pennsylvania Appeals by following Woods Law Offices on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn, or leave a review on Apple Podcasts.
Thanks for listening!
11 episodes
Share
