Artwork

Content provided by Krista Software. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Krista Software or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

The Future of TPRM

41:48
 
Share
 

Manage episode 395920060 series 3435981
Content provided by Krista Software. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Krista Software or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.

Most third-party risk lifecycles adhere to a similar pattern: planning, due diligence, contract negotiations, ongoing monitoring, and termination. However, the management and responsibility of these processes differ significantly across organizations. Traditionally, the information security department carried this burden, but recent events like Covid, regional wars, political changes, and socially-focused laws have broadened organizations' risk perception beyond just IT. They now include geographical, reputational, concentration, and compliance risks.

Different departments, leveraging their unique expertise, now seek information from third parties to manage diverse risk types. Third-party risk management expert, Tom Garrubba, practical advice to assist companies in tailoring third-party risk management activities to their size, risk profile, and risk management necessities. Regardless of where the organization situates third-party risk management, the ultimate responsibility rests with the third-party risk manager and the business owner. They must identify the necessities and required documentation for each vendor, enabling a thorough assessment and due diligence or ongoing monitoring.

The assessment process presents challenges for both the vendor and the risk manager, often requiring over 40 hours to complete and validate. Midsize companies dealing with dozens to hundreds of third parties quickly face the reality of these complications. Additionally, vendors often feel overwhelmed with assessment requests from their many customers and may instead issue a "customer assurance packet" containing broad information sets for you to sift through to identify potential risks.

Third-party risk management is essential, even for industries not legally required to do so. Those lacking a robust strategy and supporting technology risk overloading their vendors with assessments and distracting internal teams. Furthermore, if you operate in a regulated industry, expect your strategy and technology to face scrutiny eventually.

More at krista.ai

  continue reading

60 episodes

Artwork

The Future of TPRM

The Union

published

iconShare
 
Manage episode 395920060 series 3435981
Content provided by Krista Software. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Krista Software or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.

Most third-party risk lifecycles adhere to a similar pattern: planning, due diligence, contract negotiations, ongoing monitoring, and termination. However, the management and responsibility of these processes differ significantly across organizations. Traditionally, the information security department carried this burden, but recent events like Covid, regional wars, political changes, and socially-focused laws have broadened organizations' risk perception beyond just IT. They now include geographical, reputational, concentration, and compliance risks.

Different departments, leveraging their unique expertise, now seek information from third parties to manage diverse risk types. Third-party risk management expert, Tom Garrubba, practical advice to assist companies in tailoring third-party risk management activities to their size, risk profile, and risk management necessities. Regardless of where the organization situates third-party risk management, the ultimate responsibility rests with the third-party risk manager and the business owner. They must identify the necessities and required documentation for each vendor, enabling a thorough assessment and due diligence or ongoing monitoring.

The assessment process presents challenges for both the vendor and the risk manager, often requiring over 40 hours to complete and validate. Midsize companies dealing with dozens to hundreds of third parties quickly face the reality of these complications. Additionally, vendors often feel overwhelmed with assessment requests from their many customers and may instead issue a "customer assurance packet" containing broad information sets for you to sift through to identify potential risks.

Third-party risk management is essential, even for industries not legally required to do so. Those lacking a robust strategy and supporting technology risk overloading their vendors with assessments and distracting internal teams. Furthermore, if you operate in a regulated industry, expect your strategy and technology to face scrutiny eventually.

More at krista.ai

  continue reading

60 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play