Ep. 3285 Jordan Peterson Gets WRECKED in Debate! Here’s What He SHOULD HAVE SAID!!!

Turley Talks

In this episode, I talk about the fiery exchange between Jordan Peterson and a roomful of atheists during a Jubilee event. But the real issue wasn’t belief—it was a fundamental misunderstanding of religion itself. Learn what Peterson should have said and why our entire cultural framework, including that of self-proclaimed atheists, is deeply rooted in Christianity.

--

Go to http://GetLiverHelp.com/Turley to try their Liver Health Formula and get a FREE 1-month supply of Blood Sugar Formula!

*The content presented by sponsors may contain affiliate links. When you click and shop the links, Turley Talks may receive a small commission.*

Leave a message for Steve! Call now! 717-844-5984

Highlights:

• “What Peterson should have said, when asked: ‘either you’re a Christian or you’re not, which is it?’, the answer is simple: ‘Of course, I’m a Christian, and not only that, so are you!’... ‘Yes, I’m a Christian, and guess what, so are you! And so are (most likely) all 19 other so-called atheists in this room.”
• “Whenever people debate religion, either side rarely stops to define precisely what they mean by this term ‘religion’. Cultural anthropologists have argued now for over a century that religion is fundamentally a social order.”

Timestamps:

[00:21] Jordan Peterson’s debated identity as a Christian

[05:40] Why both atheists and believers misunderstand religion

[06:57] The anthropological definition of religion as a social order

[12:05] How Western atheism is rooted in Christian tradition

--

Thank you for taking the time to listen to this episode. If you enjoyed this episode, please subscribe and/or leave a review.

FOLLOW me on X (Twitter): https://twitter.com/DrTurleyTalks

Sign up for the 'New Conservative Age Rising' Email Alerts to get lots of articles on conservative trends: https://turleytalks.com/subscribe-to-our-newsletter

**The use of any copyrighted material in this podcast is done so for educational and informational purposes only including parody, commentary, and criticism. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015). It is believed that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.