))
Does Sola Scriptura Fail? A Protestant Response to Joe Heschmeyer Pt 1 | Weighed in the Balance Ep. 4
Manage episode 482606768 series 3662239
Content provided by Jonathan Brooks & Co and Jonathan Brooks. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Jonathan Brooks & Co and Jonathan Brooks or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
In this episode, we take a close look at a popular Catholic critique of Protestantism, put forward by Catholic apologist Joe Heschmeyer. Heschmeyer argues:
1️⃣ If the Protestant view of Scripture is correct, there should be unity on essential doctrines.
2️⃣ There is not unity among Protestants on essential doctrines.
🔚 Therefore, the Protestant view of Scripture is incorrect.
He also claims that Protestantism ultimately rejects the authority and necessity of the Church, and that the very question, "Which doctrines are essential?" is the unraveling thread of the entire Protestant tradition.
But is this a fair and accurate representation of Protestant theology? Does disagreement among believers disprove the sufficiency of Scripture? And is the Catholic model immune to doctrinal division?
Join us as we explore these questions from a Protestant perspective—examining the assumptions behind Heschmeyer’s logic, the historical and biblical case for Sola Scriptura, and whether visible doctrinal unity is the right measuring stick for theological truth.
Whether you're Protestant, Catholic, or just curious, this episode offers a thoughtful and respectful dialogue around the foundations of authority, doctrine, and unity in the Church.
Don't forget to like, subscribe, and join the conversation in the comments!
Do you think this claim is found wanting? Let us know on social!!
5 episodes
Share
