Artwork

Content provided by Mark Carey. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Mark Carey or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

S6 Ep123: The Supreme Court just made it easier for employers to deny overtime pay: EMD Sales, Inc. v. Carrera

13:03
 
Share
 

Manage episode 478841366 series 2858396
Content provided by Mark Carey. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Mark Carey or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.

Comment on the Show by Sending Mark a Text Message.

This episode is part of my initiative to provide access to important court decisions impacting employees in an easy to understand conversational format using AI. The speakers in the episode are AI generated and frankly sound great to listen to. Enjoy!

The scales of workplace justice have just shifted. In a unanimous decision that has sent ripples through labor law circles, the Supreme Court has lowered the standard of proof employers need to demonstrate when classifying workers as exempt from overtime pay.
At the heart of this groundbreaking case lies EMD Sales, a food distributor whose sales representatives spent long 60-hour weeks stocking shelves, managing inventory, and processing orders at grocery stores across the Washington DC area. These employees, paid only on commission, sued for overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). EMD claimed they were "outside salesmen" – exempt from overtime requirements – but did their day-to-day responsibilities actually constitute "making sales"? The answer depended heavily on whether they were working at chain stores with pre-established corporate agreements or at independent shops where they had more sales autonomy.
The Supreme Court didn't rule on whether these particular workers deserved overtime. Instead, they focused on a crucial procedural question: what level of proof should employers need to show when claiming a worker is exempt? Previously, in the Fourth Circuit, employers needed to meet a high "clear and convincing evidence" standard. Now, the Court has established nationwide that only a "preponderance of evidence" – essentially just over 50% likelihood – is required. This seemingly technical change could significantly impact millions of workers' overtime eligibility and shift the power balance in workplace disputes across America.
The next time you're wondering whether your job qualifies for overtime protection, remember this watershed case. Understanding your rights has never been more important as the legal landscape evolves. Subscribe to our podcast for more deep dives into the court decisions that directly impact your workplace rights and compensation.

If you enjoyed this episode of the Employee Survival Guide please like us on Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn. We would really appreciate if you could leave a review of this podcast on your favorite podcast player such as Apple Podcasts. Leaving a review will inform other listeners you found the content on this podcast is important in the area of employment law in the United States.
For more information, please contact our employment attorneys at Carey & Associates, P.C. at 203-255-4150, www.capclaw.com.
Disclaimer: For educational use only, not intended to be legal advice.

  continue reading

Chapters

1. S6 Ep123: The Supreme Court just made it easier for employers to deny overtime pay: EMD Sales, Inc. v. Carrera (00:00:00)

2. Welcome to the EMD Sales Court Case (00:00:36)

3. District Court's Initial Ruling (00:01:48)

4. Chain Stores vs Independent Shops (00:05:49)

5. Fourth Circuit Upholds Higher Standard (00:07:47)

6. Supreme Court Reverses: Lower Burden (00:10:00)

7. Real-World Impact of the Ruling (00:12:23)

126 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 478841366 series 2858396
Content provided by Mark Carey. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Mark Carey or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.

Comment on the Show by Sending Mark a Text Message.

This episode is part of my initiative to provide access to important court decisions impacting employees in an easy to understand conversational format using AI. The speakers in the episode are AI generated and frankly sound great to listen to. Enjoy!

The scales of workplace justice have just shifted. In a unanimous decision that has sent ripples through labor law circles, the Supreme Court has lowered the standard of proof employers need to demonstrate when classifying workers as exempt from overtime pay.
At the heart of this groundbreaking case lies EMD Sales, a food distributor whose sales representatives spent long 60-hour weeks stocking shelves, managing inventory, and processing orders at grocery stores across the Washington DC area. These employees, paid only on commission, sued for overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). EMD claimed they were "outside salesmen" – exempt from overtime requirements – but did their day-to-day responsibilities actually constitute "making sales"? The answer depended heavily on whether they were working at chain stores with pre-established corporate agreements or at independent shops where they had more sales autonomy.
The Supreme Court didn't rule on whether these particular workers deserved overtime. Instead, they focused on a crucial procedural question: what level of proof should employers need to show when claiming a worker is exempt? Previously, in the Fourth Circuit, employers needed to meet a high "clear and convincing evidence" standard. Now, the Court has established nationwide that only a "preponderance of evidence" – essentially just over 50% likelihood – is required. This seemingly technical change could significantly impact millions of workers' overtime eligibility and shift the power balance in workplace disputes across America.
The next time you're wondering whether your job qualifies for overtime protection, remember this watershed case. Understanding your rights has never been more important as the legal landscape evolves. Subscribe to our podcast for more deep dives into the court decisions that directly impact your workplace rights and compensation.

If you enjoyed this episode of the Employee Survival Guide please like us on Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn. We would really appreciate if you could leave a review of this podcast on your favorite podcast player such as Apple Podcasts. Leaving a review will inform other listeners you found the content on this podcast is important in the area of employment law in the United States.
For more information, please contact our employment attorneys at Carey & Associates, P.C. at 203-255-4150, www.capclaw.com.
Disclaimer: For educational use only, not intended to be legal advice.

  continue reading

Chapters

1. S6 Ep123: The Supreme Court just made it easier for employers to deny overtime pay: EMD Sales, Inc. v. Carrera (00:00:00)

2. Welcome to the EMD Sales Court Case (00:00:36)

3. District Court's Initial Ruling (00:01:48)

4. Chain Stores vs Independent Shops (00:05:49)

5. Fourth Circuit Upholds Higher Standard (00:07:47)

6. Supreme Court Reverses: Lower Burden (00:10:00)

7. Real-World Impact of the Ruling (00:12:23)

126 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play