Artwork

Content provided by newDemocracy Foundation and NewDemocracy Foundation. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by newDemocracy Foundation and NewDemocracy Foundation or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Episode 1 Citizens' Juries with Ned Crosby and Pat Benn

31:37
 
Share
 

Manage episode 279440010 series 2816253
Content provided by newDemocracy Foundation and NewDemocracy Foundation. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by newDemocracy Foundation and NewDemocracy Foundation or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
Ned Crosby is the American inventor of Citizens' Juries. He and his wife Pat Benn have supported and developed these processes over many years. In this interview, he and Pat talk about the development of the process, its refinement over the years and the more recent development of Citizens' Initiative Review in Oregon. Ned created the citizens' jury process in 1971 in response to his concerns about moral relativism. He decided to ask a randomly selected group of citizens to reason and consider issues. It wasn’t until the 1980s that academics started writing about using randomly selected citizens to deliberate without much awareness of Ned or Peter Dienel’s practical work. They set up the Jefferson Centre in 1974 to work on basic ways to improve the workings of democracy. They ran many citizens’ juries over the years including one to evaluate gubernatorial candidates’ stance on issues in Minnesota in 1990, another to evaluate US Senate candidates in Pennsylvania, and two national citizens’ juries in the US in 1993. The Citizens’ Initiative Review process was based on the citizens’ jury process to evaluate ballot measures. Citizens’ panel is asked to determine whether to support or reject a proposed ballot measure and then their view is included in the voter pamphlet that is distributed ahead of the vote. Ned identifies the importance of witnesses to the citizens’ jury process. Ned and Pat identify as important elements of facilitation of citizens’ juries
  • respect and minimising facilitator bias and
  • lead process without dominating the people.
Ned mentions John Gastil and Jim Fishkin, both of whom you will hear from in future episodes of this podcast series. Music acknowledgement.
  continue reading

47 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 279440010 series 2816253
Content provided by newDemocracy Foundation and NewDemocracy Foundation. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by newDemocracy Foundation and NewDemocracy Foundation or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ppacc.player.fm/legal.
Ned Crosby is the American inventor of Citizens' Juries. He and his wife Pat Benn have supported and developed these processes over many years. In this interview, he and Pat talk about the development of the process, its refinement over the years and the more recent development of Citizens' Initiative Review in Oregon. Ned created the citizens' jury process in 1971 in response to his concerns about moral relativism. He decided to ask a randomly selected group of citizens to reason and consider issues. It wasn’t until the 1980s that academics started writing about using randomly selected citizens to deliberate without much awareness of Ned or Peter Dienel’s practical work. They set up the Jefferson Centre in 1974 to work on basic ways to improve the workings of democracy. They ran many citizens’ juries over the years including one to evaluate gubernatorial candidates’ stance on issues in Minnesota in 1990, another to evaluate US Senate candidates in Pennsylvania, and two national citizens’ juries in the US in 1993. The Citizens’ Initiative Review process was based on the citizens’ jury process to evaluate ballot measures. Citizens’ panel is asked to determine whether to support or reject a proposed ballot measure and then their view is included in the voter pamphlet that is distributed ahead of the vote. Ned identifies the importance of witnesses to the citizens’ jury process. Ned and Pat identify as important elements of facilitation of citizens’ juries
  • respect and minimising facilitator bias and
  • lead process without dominating the people.
Ned mentions John Gastil and Jim Fishkin, both of whom you will hear from in future episodes of this podcast series. Music acknowledgement.
  continue reading

47 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play