Go offline with the Player FM app!
“An invasion of Taiwan is uncomfortably likely, potentially catastrophic, and we can help avoid it.” by JoelMcGuire
Manage episode 489629424 series 3281452
Formosa: Fulcrum of the Future?
An invasion of Taiwan is uncomfortably likely and potentially catastrophic. We should research better ways to avoid it.
TLDR: I forecast that an invasion of Taiwan increases all the anthropogenic risks by ~1.5% (percentage points) of a catastrophe killing 10% or more of the population by 2100 (nuclear risk by 0.9%, AI + Biorisk by 0.6%). This would imply it constitutes a sizable share of the total catastrophic risk burden expected over the rest of this century by skilled and knowledgeable forecasters (8% of the total risk of 20% according to domain experts and 17% of the total risk of 9% according to superforecasters).
I think this means that we should research ways to cost-effectively decrease the likelihood that China invades Taiwan. This could mean exploring the prospect of advocating that Taiwan increase its deterrence by investing in cheap but lethal weapons platforms [...]
---
Outline:
(00:13) Formosa: Fulcrum of the Future?
(02:04) Part 0: Background
(03:44) Part 1: Invasion -- uncomfortably possible.
(08:33) Part 2: Why an invasion would be bad
(10:27) 2.1 War and nuclear war
(19:20) 2.2. The end of cooperation: AI and Bio-risk
(22:44) 2.3 Appeasement or capitulation and the end of the liberal-led order: Value risk
(26:04) Part 3: How to prevent a war
(29:39) 3.1. Diplomacy: speaking softly
(31:21) 3.2. Deterrence: carrying a big stick
(34:16) Toy model of deterrence
(37:58) Toy cost-effectiveness of deterrence
(41:13) How to cost-effectively increase deterrence
(43:30) Risks of a deterrence strategy
(44:12) 3.3. What can be done?
(44:42) How tractable is it to increase deterrence?
(45:43) A theory of change for philanthropy increasing Taiwan's military deterrence
(45:56) en-US-AvaMultilingualNeural__ Flow chart showing policy influence between think tanks and Taiwan security outcomes.
(48:55) 4. Conclusion and further work
(50:53) With more time
(52:00) Bonus thoughts
(52:09) 1. Reminder: a catastrophe killing 10% or more of humanity is pretty unprecedented
(53:06) 2. Where's the Effective Altruist think tank for preventing global conflict?
(54:11) 3. Does forecasting risks based on scenarios change our view on the likelihood of catastrophe?
The original text contained 16 footnotes which were omitted from this narration.
---
First published:
June 15th, 2025
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
---
Images from the article:
Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.
256 episodes
Manage episode 489629424 series 3281452
Formosa: Fulcrum of the Future?
An invasion of Taiwan is uncomfortably likely and potentially catastrophic. We should research better ways to avoid it.
TLDR: I forecast that an invasion of Taiwan increases all the anthropogenic risks by ~1.5% (percentage points) of a catastrophe killing 10% or more of the population by 2100 (nuclear risk by 0.9%, AI + Biorisk by 0.6%). This would imply it constitutes a sizable share of the total catastrophic risk burden expected over the rest of this century by skilled and knowledgeable forecasters (8% of the total risk of 20% according to domain experts and 17% of the total risk of 9% according to superforecasters).
I think this means that we should research ways to cost-effectively decrease the likelihood that China invades Taiwan. This could mean exploring the prospect of advocating that Taiwan increase its deterrence by investing in cheap but lethal weapons platforms [...]
---
Outline:
(00:13) Formosa: Fulcrum of the Future?
(02:04) Part 0: Background
(03:44) Part 1: Invasion -- uncomfortably possible.
(08:33) Part 2: Why an invasion would be bad
(10:27) 2.1 War and nuclear war
(19:20) 2.2. The end of cooperation: AI and Bio-risk
(22:44) 2.3 Appeasement or capitulation and the end of the liberal-led order: Value risk
(26:04) Part 3: How to prevent a war
(29:39) 3.1. Diplomacy: speaking softly
(31:21) 3.2. Deterrence: carrying a big stick
(34:16) Toy model of deterrence
(37:58) Toy cost-effectiveness of deterrence
(41:13) How to cost-effectively increase deterrence
(43:30) Risks of a deterrence strategy
(44:12) 3.3. What can be done?
(44:42) How tractable is it to increase deterrence?
(45:43) A theory of change for philanthropy increasing Taiwan's military deterrence
(45:56) en-US-AvaMultilingualNeural__ Flow chart showing policy influence between think tanks and Taiwan security outcomes.
(48:55) 4. Conclusion and further work
(50:53) With more time
(52:00) Bonus thoughts
(52:09) 1. Reminder: a catastrophe killing 10% or more of humanity is pretty unprecedented
(53:06) 2. Where's the Effective Altruist think tank for preventing global conflict?
(54:11) 3. Does forecasting risks based on scenarios change our view on the likelihood of catastrophe?
The original text contained 16 footnotes which were omitted from this narration.
---
First published:
June 15th, 2025
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
---
Images from the article:
Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.
256 episodes
All episodes
×Welcome to Player FM!
Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.